Sheeeat, he's changing legislation on the fly. Eff the EOs. The first is the ******* problem.

He's also using regulations through different departments to subvert Congress as well.

The EO talk is a damn ruse. Don't be fooled.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

(02-25-2014 07:23 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Where'd you get your education? Inside a Cracker Jack box?

An EO that attempts to legislate is unconstitutional. Period. Writing laws is the domain of Congress. The executive branch is to see that the legislation is executed or carried out.

Obama has overstepped Constitutional bounds on many occasions. Nobody yet has challenged him on it. Doesn't make it any less unconstitutional.

I realize this is from wiki, but it's clearly superior to any education you've done on this matter.

Quote:United States Presidents issue executive orders to help officers and agencies of the executive branch manage the operations within the federal government itself. Executive orders have the full force of law when they take authority from a power granted directly to the Executive by the Constitution, or are made in pursuance of certain Acts of Congress that explicitly delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation). Like statutes or regulations promulgated by government agencies, executive orders are subject to judicial review, and may be struck down if deemed by the courts to be unsupported by statute or the Constitution. Major policy initiatives usually require approval by the legislative branch, but executive orders have significant influence over the internal affairs of government, deciding how and to what degree laws will be enforced, dealing with emergencies, waging war, and in general fine policy choices in the implementation of broad statutes.