(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Someone in this thread was tight with Parrish. He swore up and down that Parrish was tight with Cal and the staff. The next thing you know, Parrish and Pat Forde are high fiving each other when Chalmers makes the shot; the poster who was tight with Parrish loses his contact, and then all of a sudden he starts going off on Cal.

It is what it is.

(02-20-2014 09:59 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

Ah, so we get to the root of the issue. This has to do with josh and your disdain for him, which is within your right. Winning is hard whether josh said it or another coach said it.

Disdain for josh? That is just simply not true. Feel free to go back over my past posts and find examples of this disdain if you are so sure of yourself.

The line is stupid. Beating a team worse than you is what you are supposed to do. Every time a team gets upset we have to pull that line out? Really?

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

(02-20-2014 10:59 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

Whatever. I am sick of all the bickering. I am done.....carry on.

(02-20-2014 10:59 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

Well first off that is a dumb and idiotic comparison. Would it be hard for the Heat to beat the Bucks is a better comparison. On most nights no it wouldn't, but occasionally it is so therefore winning is hard.

Yea better teams should beat worse teams, but guess what it doesn't always happen hence the phrase winning is hard.

If you don't like the phrase then why post just ignore it

(02-20-2014 11:22 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:59 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

Well first off that is a dumb and idiotic comparison. Would it be hard for the Heat to beat the Bucks is a better comparison. On most nights no it wouldn't, but occasionally it is so therefore winning is hard.

Yea better teams should beat worse teams, but guess what it doesn't always happen hence the phrase winning is hard.

If you don't like the phrase then why post just ignore it

By that logic if you do not like me not liking the phrase ignore me saying so.

The comparison was supposed to be idiotic by the way to prove just how idiotic the blanket statement winning is hard is.

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

+3

(02-20-2014 10:59 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

FUT
The Heat = White Station
Josh Pastner = Tic Price

At least you're consisent.

Pimpin' ain't easy.

(02-20-2014 11:26 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 11:22 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:59 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

Well first off that is a dumb and idiotic comparison. Would it be hard for the Heat to beat the Bucks is a better comparison. On most nights no it wouldn't, but occasionally it is so therefore winning is hard.

Yea better teams should beat worse teams, but guess what it doesn't always happen hence the phrase winning is hard.

If you don't like the phrase then why post just ignore it

By that logic if you do not like me not liking the phrase ignore me saying so.

The comparison was supposed to be idiotic by the way to prove just how idiotic the blanket statement winning is hard is.

only to you the statement is stupid. The statement is correct and makes sense

(02-20-2014 11:48 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 11:26 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 11:22 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:59 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:13 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  So what you're trying to say is winning is easy. Ok then.

And BTW, I wasn't one of "you guys".

Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

Well first off that is a dumb and idiotic comparison. Would it be hard for the Heat to beat the Bucks is a better comparison. On most nights no it wouldn't, but occasionally it is so therefore winning is hard.

Yea better teams should beat worse teams, but guess what it doesn't always happen hence the phrase winning is hard.

If you don't like the phrase then why post just ignore it

By that logic if you do not like me not liking the phrase ignore me saying so.

The comparison was supposed to be idiotic by the way to prove just how idiotic the blanket statement winning is hard is.

only to you the statement is stupid. The statement is correct and makes sense

Only to me? You sure? Your last sentence is simply your opinion.

(02-20-2014 11:55 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 11:48 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 11:26 AM)FUT Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 11:22 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(02-20-2014 10:59 AM)FUT Wrote:  Would it be hard for the heat to beat white station? Is winning really ALWAYS hard? No, no its not.

Well first off that is a dumb and idiotic comparison. Would it be hard for the Heat to beat the Bucks is a better comparison. On most nights no it wouldn't, but occasionally it is so therefore winning is hard.

Yea better teams should beat worse teams, but guess what it doesn't always happen hence the phrase winning is hard.

If you don't like the phrase then why post just ignore it

By that logic if you do not like me not liking the phrase ignore me saying so.

The comparison was supposed to be idiotic by the way to prove just how idiotic the blanket statement winning is hard is.

only to you the statement is stupid. The statement is correct and makes sense

Only to me? You sure? Your last sentence is simply your opinion.

No I'm pretty sure the statement " Winning is hard" is correct. If it wasn't then why do upsets happen?


I'll answer it for you it's because winning is hard it's not easy and it's not meant to be easy. That is why top teams struggle

(02-19-2014 09:24 PM)tmoneyinmphs Wrote:  For you tiger fans who think there is some conspiracy against the tigers, i hope you will realize this crap goes on more than you think in the college and pro levels for whatever reasons. I haven't watched all this game, but i have watched the last half of the 2nd half and overtime, and syracuse was given several home court calls. Only called one foul in last 10 minutes of regulation on syracuse. Syracuse had 3 fouls not called including two shooting fouls in overtime when they were behind. That out of bounds ball obviously belonged to boston college, but after a couple minutes, the refs stuck with the wrong call. Refs were forced to call two fouls on syracuse and put BC on the line in the end which made the stats look a little better, but until that time, syracuse had 4:1 advantage in free throw attempts. BC toughed it out.

I don't necessarily think most Tiger fans that subscribe to the conspiracy theory see it as a plight against the Tigers. More along the lines similar to politicians and central bankers. Don't underestimate the lengths the powers that be will go to protect their position of power from those who are perceived as a threat to it. Could be wrong though.

(02-20-2014 09:49 AM)FUT Wrote:  Just listened to cal on mike and mike. It just reminded me how you guys were mouthpieces for him too when he was here. Josh could tell some folks the sky is red and they would put it in their mt.org signature. I wonder what Ticism was y'all's favorite?

Dude.

C'mon already.

Things really that bad for you...?

(02-20-2014 12:50 PM)I_LUV_MEMPHISTIGERS Wrote:  

(02-19-2014 09:24 PM)tmoneyinmphs Wrote:  For you tiger fans who think there is some conspiracy against the tigers, i hope you will realize this crap goes on more than you think in the college and pro levels for whatever reasons. I haven't watched all this game, but i have watched the last half of the 2nd half and overtime, and syracuse was given several home court calls. Only called one foul in last 10 minutes of regulation on syracuse. Syracuse had 3 fouls not called including two shooting fouls in overtime when they were behind. That out of bounds ball obviously belonged to boston college, but after a couple minutes, the refs stuck with the wrong call. Refs were forced to call two fouls on syracuse and put BC on the line in the end which made the stats look a little better, but until that time, syracuse had 4:1 advantage in free throw attempts. BC toughed it out.

I don't necessarily think most Tiger fans that subscribe to the conspiracy theory see it as a plight against the Tigers. More along the lines similar to politicians and central bankers. Don't underestimate the lengths the powers that be will go to protect their position of power from those who are perceived as a threat to it. Could be wrong though.

Correct. Most games are fairly called, 'most' being the operative word.

(02-20-2014 03:16 PM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

Go fly a kite