Which occasion? He's come under fire for editing on nearly every thing he's ever done!

(02-25-2014 09:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Which occasion? He's come under fire for editing on nearly every thing he's ever done!

I'm referring to the BT video in particular Tom, and so far, nobody can show any edits which changed the message (again, that's the important part). The only edit so far was the apparent edit of the laugh

(02-25-2014 09:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Which occasion? He's come under fire for editing on nearly every thing he's ever done!

What film producer/director doesn't edit nearly everything he/she does?

The issue is not whether they are edited but whether the editing changes any essential message. Are you aware of any editing that he has done which has changed any essential message? What, when, and how?

(02-24-2014 05:17 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(02-24-2014 05:16 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Repugs will complain and do whatever it takes to win elections; whether they actually
have the votes or not.

2000.

Oh please, it's time to give up on this fantasy. Every recount, including those conducted by the New York Times, Washington Post and USA Today, determined Bush would have won Florida regardless of the recount standard applied.

The only way that Gore would have won is if different recount standards were used in different counties, a process proposed by the Florida courts and vacated when the Supreme Court found (in a 7-2 vote) that different standards violated the 14th amendment.

If you want to blame anyone for Bush's win, blame Ralph Nader.