(02-08-2014 06:26 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:24 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:23 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 04:54 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 04:24 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Yes, agree, but two would have been better for Marshall than a three. A two you still live to play, a three not so much with 1.2 seconds to go.

We couldn't work inside all night and the defender was stuck between selecting Craig or Watson to guard and the other guy that pulled back was thinking about the paint...they also got bunched up out top with the screen by Craig....it was just one of those things that happens....just my take on it

I was pissed DT called a time out....we are usually horrible on the in bounds having to shoot with less than seven on the clock.

Actually, we've done better after he calls a time out than not. The conference championship game comes to mind. Neither Mills nor Boardingham stepped out to set a screen for Watson at the end of the first overtime. As a result Watson didn't even get off a shot before the buzzer.

too many other fails at the end of the first half especially.....

With or without a time out. I had no faith that we'd score either way under Eustachy. Tyndall designs some great out-of-bounds plays. Eustachy rarely bothered to.

Now, that I can agree with you on...I must have a fever...lol

(02-08-2014 06:26 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:24 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:23 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 04:54 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 04:24 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Yes, agree, but two would have been better for Marshall than a three. A two you still live to play, a three not so much with 1.2 seconds to go.

We couldn't work inside all night and the defender was stuck between selecting Craig or Watson to guard and the other guy that pulled back was thinking about the paint...they also got bunched up out top with the screen by Craig....it was just one of those things that happens....just my take on it

I was pissed DT called a time out....we are usually horrible on the in bounds having to shoot with less than seven on the clock.

Actually, we've done better after he calls a time out than not. The conference championship game comes to mind. Neither Mills nor Boardingham stepped out to set a screen for Watson at the end of the first overtime. As a result Watson didn't even get off a shot before the buzzer.

too many other fails at the end of the first half especially.....

With or without a time out. I had no faith that we'd score either way under Eustachy. Tyndall designs some great out-of-bounds plays. Eustachy rarely bothered to.

edit reply: totally agree with that....regardless of design or 'in the flow', we seem to be a tad slow to open it up according to plan....that was the main point

(02-08-2014 09:40 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:26 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:24 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:23 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 04:54 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  We couldn't work inside all night and the defender was stuck between selecting Craig or Watson to guard and the other guy that pulled back was thinking about the paint...they also got bunched up out top with the screen by Craig....it was just one of those things that happens....just my take on it

I was pissed DT called a time out....we are usually horrible on the in bounds having to shoot with less than seven on the clock.

Actually, we've done better after he calls a time out than not. The conference championship game comes to mind. Neither Mills nor Boardingham stepped out to set a screen for Watson at the end of the first overtime. As a result Watson didn't even get off a shot before the buzzer.

too many other fails at the end of the first half especially.....

With or without a time out. I had no faith that we'd score either way under Eustachy. Tyndall designs some great out-of-bounds plays. Eustachy rarely bothered to.

edit reply: totally agree with that....regardless of design or 'in the flow', we seem to be a tad slow to open it up according to plan....that was the main point

The time out was the correct call though. He let them play but it was obvious that they were out of control.

(02-08-2014 02:40 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  last second winning shot....

https://vine.co/v/Malgq7vit0X

great post stink. were you cleared by management to post it?

(02-08-2014 09:42 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:40 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:26 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:24 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:23 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  Actually, we've done better after he calls a time out than not. The conference championship game comes to mind. Neither Mills nor Boardingham stepped out to set a screen for Watson at the end of the first overtime. As a result Watson didn't even get off a shot before the buzzer.

too many other fails at the end of the first half especially.....

With or without a time out. I had no faith that we'd score either way under Eustachy. Tyndall designs some great out-of-bounds plays. Eustachy rarely bothered to.

edit reply: totally agree with that....regardless of design or 'in the flow', we seem to be a tad slow to open it up according to plan....that was the main point

The time out was the correct call though. He let them play but it was obvious that they were out of control.

remember now, watson was not part of the "design"....just sayin'

anyway you cut it, watson gutted that one in pure fashion and I'm not big on semantics....w&ls baby

I don't know if you caught either UTEP game, but they are REAL....not discounting tomorrow, but my mind is on Feb twenty-two.....

(02-08-2014 09:46 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 02:40 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  last second winning shot....

https://vine.co/v/Malgq7vit0X

great post stink. were you cleared by management to post it?

went 007 from another site....one of my few fb grabs that was pass-it-on worthy.....

(02-08-2014 09:46 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:42 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:40 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:26 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:24 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  too many other fails at the end of the first half especially.....

With or without a time out. I had no faith that we'd score either way under Eustachy. Tyndall designs some great out-of-bounds plays. Eustachy rarely bothered to.

edit reply: totally agree with that....regardless of design or 'in the flow', we seem to be a tad slow to open it up according to plan....that was the main point

The time out was the correct call though. He let them play but it was obvious that they were out of control.

remember now, watson was not part of the "design"....just sayin'

anyway you cut it, watson gutted that one in pure fashion and I'm not big on semantics....w&ls baby

I don't know if you caught either UTEP game, but they are REAL....not discounting tomorrow, but my mind is on Feb twenty-two.....

According to Tyndall in the post game interview on CBS Sports, Watson had the green light to shoot if he was open coming off the screen. I would say he was part of the design. Especially since it was a double ball screen taking Craig and Boardingham out of the paint.

(02-08-2014 09:48 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:46 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 02:40 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  last second winning shot....

https://vine.co/v/Malgq7vit0X

great post stink. were you cleared by management to post it?

went 007 from another site....one of my few fb grabs that was pass-it-on worthy.....

I have planted hidden cams in mm roberts for the next spring game. they're on to us, but we can adapt.

(02-08-2014 09:52 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:48 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:46 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 02:40 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  last second winning shot....

https://vine.co/v/Malgq7vit0X

great post stink. were you cleared by management to post it?

went 007 from another site....one of my few fb grabs that was pass-it-on worthy.....

I have planted hidden cams in mm roberts for the next spring game. they're on to us, but we can adapt.

c'mon man....don't give out hints before the coding is completed, dammit....search your soul to make sure there's not harm being committed against the home team

(02-08-2014 09:51 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:46 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:42 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:40 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 06:26 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  With or without a time out. I had no faith that we'd score either way under Eustachy. Tyndall designs some great out-of-bounds plays. Eustachy rarely bothered to.

edit reply: totally agree with that....regardless of design or 'in the flow', we seem to be a tad slow to open it up according to plan....that was the main point

The time out was the correct call though. He let them play but it was obvious that they were out of control.

remember now, watson was not part of the "design"....just sayin'

anyway you cut it, watson gutted that one in pure fashion and I'm not big on semantics....w&ls baby

I don't know if you caught either UTEP game, but they are REAL....not discounting tomorrow, but my mind is on Feb twenty-two.....

According to Tyndall in the post game interview on CBS Sports, Watson had the green light to shoot if he was open coming off the screen. I would say he was part of the design. Especially since it was a double ball screen taking Craig and Boardingham out of the paint.

missed that comment and listened to the postgame....was referencing a previous post that was obviously not from you....chief, my memory doesn't work so well sometimes...that's what I need you guys for (you know I'm messin' with ya on the last statement, right?)

edit: missed where you referenced cbs.....

(02-09-2014 12:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:51 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:46 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:42 PM)Funslinger Wrote:  

(02-08-2014 09:40 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  edit reply: totally agree with that....regardless of design or 'in the flow', we seem to be a tad slow to open it up according to plan....that was the main point

The time out was the correct call though. He let them play but it was obvious that they were out of control.

remember now, watson was not part of the "design"....just sayin'

anyway you cut it, watson gutted that one in pure fashion and I'm not big on semantics....w&ls baby

I don't know if you caught either UTEP game, but they are REAL....not discounting tomorrow, but my mind is on Feb twenty-two.....

According to Tyndall in the post game interview on CBS Sports, Watson had the green light to shoot if he was open coming off the screen. I would say he was part of the design. Especially since it was a double ball screen taking Craig and Boardingham out of the paint.

missed that comment and listened to the postgame....was referencing a previous post that was obviously not from you....chief, my memory doesn't work so well sometimes...that's what I need you guys for (you know I'm messin' with ya on the last statement, right?)

edit: missed where you referenced cbs.....

Watching the replay, it looks like Tyndall was setting up a three-point shot. Craig and Boardingham were up top right setting a double ball screen for Watson (who had made his previous two three-point attempts). Brooks (who had made two of his previous three three-point attempts) was behind the arc on the left side. Brown (who was 2-4 from three on the night) was behind the arc on the right side. Just from observing the play, I think the plan was for Watson to drive right around the screen and either shoot the fifteen footer if open or kick to Brown on the right wing if covered. Based on how Canty played defense (backing off Watson, preparing to fight through the screen), Watson correctly refused the screen and hit the open three.

Not planning to go inside for the tie IMO was the correct call. With the exception of four blocks, Boardingham was a detriment with five turnovers and only one basket and 2-5 from the FT line. Plus, Boardingham had a dismal ZERO rebounds. Craig was 4-4 on FGs but was 4-9 from the FT line.

Just wanted to praise Marshall for that great post D they played all game! We normally dominate the boards and score a lot underneath, but y'all took that away from us completely. Given how poorly Watson had shot that night, and how gunshy he was to even throw up a shot in the second half, I was doubly pleased with the game winning shot!