(02-07-2014 10:58 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:52 AM)Latilleon Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:29 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  I think someone just got outed.

If you are implying what I think you are implying, wouldn't the user name be something like "LesIsBest" or "LesIsMore" or something?

Wait...Are you calling me a lesbian?

"Les-b-son"?

(02-07-2014 11:21 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:05 AM)Latilleon Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:58 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:52 AM)Latilleon Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:29 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  I think someone just got outed.

If you are implying what I think you are implying, wouldn't the user name be something like "LesIsBest" or "LesIsMore" or something?

Wait...Are you calling me a lesbian?

"Les-b-son"?

Oh, lol! Well, definitely not a fan of that guy either, I prefer the fella on channel 5, when he does his schtick, at least he seems to have a pulse.

Guess you don't know who is connected with the guy at 13...

(02-07-2014 10:36 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:29 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  I think someone just got outed.

Well then finish "outing" me if that's what you think you are doing because I'd like to know too.

There's no need. Those of us that know have already been enlightened. Those that haven't been are just mindless sheep. I just find it fascinating that any perceived competitor whether it be Jason Smith, Parrish, Martin or Watson gets such a reaction from you people. Gary Parrish talks and texts with Josh on a regular basis. So does Keith. But please carry on. You're very entertaining.

(02-07-2014 11:54 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:23 AM)Latilleon Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:21 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:05 AM)Latilleon Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:58 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  Wait...Are you calling me a lesbian?

"Les-b-son"?

Oh, lol! Well, definitely not a fan of that guy either, I prefer the fella on channel 5, when he does his schtick, at least he seems to have a pulse.

Guess you don't know who is connected with the guy at 13...

No, but from the vitriol, I'm guessing it's someone Easterwood has problems with.

Nice lesbian line

I have no problem with anyone, was really defending GP'S relationship with Josh.

(02-07-2014 12:24 PM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:12 PM)Easterwood Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:54 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:23 AM)Latilleon Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:21 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  Oh, lol! Well, definitely not a fan of that guy either, I prefer the fella on channel 5, when he does his schtick, at least he seems to have a pulse.

Guess you don't know who is connected with the guy at 13...

No, but from the vitriol, I'm guessing it's someone Easterwood has problems with.

Nice lesbian line

I have no problem with anyone, was really defending GP'S relationship with Josh.

Was not disputing his relationship with Josh, or anyone's really, Josh is friendly with a lot of people. My doubt is from Gary being the king of the insiders. He's not, no one really is, Pastner passes different aspects of the team through different people. Some get recruiting info, while others are locked out, some get schedules, some get practice info, some get injury info. etc. I haven't seen anyone who Pastner seems to trust with everything.

I think you'd be surprised.

If Pastner wants a message clandestinely released, he goes to Parrish. You have to believe that's a two way street.

Pastner would probably hang with Parrish in a way he never would with Jason Smith or Geoff Calkins. Plus Parrish has a bigger audience.

I'd say they probably use each other and Parrish has better access to Pastner & the staff than anyone. Even if Parrish can't devote as much time to the program as Jason Smith.

But I'll add it seems as if a certain group of sports media have a "fraternity" that negative affects journalistic integrity where they take care of the people they like and pile on those they don't and their coverage reflects that.

(02-07-2014 12:40 PM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:31 PM)Latilleon Wrote:  If Pastner wants a message clandestinely released, he goes to Parrish. You have to believe that's a two way street.

Pastner would probably hang with Parrish in a way he never would with Jason Smith or Geoff Calkins. Plus Parrish has a bigger audience.

I'd say they probably use each other and Parrish has better access to Pastner & the staff than anyone. Even if Parrish can't devote as much time to the program as Jason Smith.

But I'll add it seems as if a certain group of sports media have a "fraternity" that negative affects journalistic integrity where they take care of the people they like and pile on those they don't and their coverage reflects that.

Agree with the last statement full-heartedly. In fact, most of my issues with the media people around the Tigers stems from their agendas and shenanigans than it does from the access or ability to get info. I miss the days when media types just stuck to reporting the news and not trying to make entertainment out of it.

I'd agree with this, many aren't really trained as a journalist.

(02-07-2014 12:45 PM)Easterwood Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:40 PM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:31 PM)Latilleon Wrote:  If Pastner wants a message clandestinely released, he goes to Parrish. You have to believe that's a two way street.

Pastner would probably hang with Parrish in a way he never would with Jason Smith or Geoff Calkins. Plus Parrish has a bigger audience.

I'd say they probably use each other and Parrish has better access to Pastner & the staff than anyone. Even if Parrish can't devote as much time to the program as Jason Smith.

But I'll add it seems as if a certain group of sports media have a "fraternity" that negative affects journalistic integrity where they take care of the people they like and pile on those they don't and their coverage reflects that.

Agree with the last statement full-heartedly. In fact, most of my issues with the media people around the Tigers stems from their agendas and shenanigans than it does from the access or ability to get info. I miss the days when media types just stuck to reporting the news and not trying to make entertainment out of it.

I'd agree with this, many aren't really trained as a journalist.

Well two are supposed to be, one wants to be, and everyone else are ultimately entertainers instead of journalists. Unfortunately, it's the entertainers that influence the journalists instead of the other way around.

(02-07-2014 12:37 PM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:27 PM)Easterwood Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:24 PM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:12 PM)Easterwood Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 11:54 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  No, but from the vitriol, I'm guessing it's someone Easterwood has problems with.

Nice lesbian line

I have no problem with anyone, was really defending GP'S relationship with Josh.

Was not disputing his relationship with Josh, or anyone's really, Josh is friendly with a lot of people. My doubt is from Gary being the king of the insiders. He's not, no one really is, Pastner passes different aspects of the team through different people. Some get recruiting info, while others are locked out, some get schedules, some get practice info, some get injury info. etc. I haven't seen anyone who Pastner seems to trust with everything.

I think you'd be surprised.

I doubt it, I'm not on the "inside" like yourself, but I'm not some piss-ant who doesn't know the players either. I think folks would be more surprised at what I know than the other way around.

you wouldn't know your *ss from third base.

Bump.
Same song, different cast.

(02-07-2014 10:26 AM)Easterwood Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:21 AM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 10:15 AM)Easterwood Wrote:  

(02-06-2014 07:35 PM)Lord2FLI Wrote:  

(02-06-2014 05:53 PM)Easterwood Wrote:  A thread about the media person who has the best inside info on Tiger basketball is more related to the Tigers than a make believe thread about firing Josh.

#seriously

#thatsfckingfunnynoseriously

Anybody who thinks that's not true is a dumbazz

Next time he breaks the news first, do let me know. And what's with the namecalling because someone disagrees with you, I thought you were above such pettiness?

I guess for business reasons a person would have to take your stance, but people know the truth.

Looks like some posts were deleted here. Hmmmm sometimes it's good to go back and reflect.

Looks to me like CBM was very prescient back when most of us were still defending CJP.