(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:35 AM)grapes Wrote:  I like them both.
We should let Tulane know we've changed our minds.
I don't understand their add..


can someone explain the value of tulane.....

Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Like who?

Besides, what's the point? We're already on higher footing than the rest of the GO5. Every "good" program we add from here on only brings down the chances of my and your school's chances of going to an access bowl on any given year.

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:35 AM)grapes Wrote:  I like them both.
We should let Tulane know we've changed our minds.
I don't understand their add..


can someone explain the value of tulane.....

Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Like who?

Besides, what's the point? We're already on higher footing than the rest of the GO5. Every "good" program we add from here on only brings down the chances of my and your school's chances from going to the BCS on any given year.

Like us Memphis fans ever have to worry about that. LET'S WATCH THE WORLD BURN!!!!!!!!

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:35 AM)grapes Wrote:  I like them both.
We should let Tulane know we've changed our minds.
I don't understand their add..


can someone explain the value of tulane.....

Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Like who?

Besides, what's the point? We're already on higher footing than the rest of the GO5. Every "good" program we add from here on only brings down the chances of my and your school's chances from going to the BCS on any given year.

Like us Memphis fans ever have to worry about that. LET'S WATCH THE WORLD BURN!!!!!!!!

What a horrible memphis football fan you are. We will be a contender in 3 years

(01-27-2014 12:26 AM)Kronke Wrote:  We all have our bouts with bad attendance. Lest we forget 4,117.

The few...the proud..."the 4,100"

They are legends to this day.

(01-27-2014 12:45 AM)Geotag Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Like who?

Besides, what's the point? We're already on higher footing than the rest of the GO5. Every "good" program we add from here on only brings down the chances of my and your school's chances from going to the BCS on any given year.

Like us Memphis fans ever have to worry about that. LET'S WATCH THE WORLD BURN!!!!!!!!

What a horrible memphis football fan you are. We will be a contender in 3 years

I was a season ticket holder from 700 miles away and went to every game we played in Texas....except at UTEP cause that might as well be in China.

(01-27-2014 12:50 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:45 AM)Geotag Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Like who?

Besides, what's the point? We're already on higher footing than the rest of the GO5. Every "good" program we add from here on only brings down the chances of my and your school's chances from going to the BCS on any given year.

Like us Memphis fans ever have to worry about that. LET'S WATCH THE WORLD BURN!!!!!!!!

What a horrible memphis football fan you are. We will be a contender in 3 years

I was a season ticket holder from 700 miles away and went to every game we played in Texas....except at UTEP cause that might as well be in China.

Where is your faith then? Fuente has us trending up.

(01-27-2014 12:56 AM)Geotag Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:50 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:45 AM)Geotag Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:42 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Like who?

Besides, what's the point? We're already on higher footing than the rest of the GO5. Every "good" program we add from here on only brings down the chances of my and your school's chances from going to the BCS on any given year.

Like us Memphis fans ever have to worry about that. LET'S WATCH THE WORLD BURN!!!!!!!!

What a horrible memphis football fan you are. We will be a contender in 3 years

I was a season ticket holder from 700 miles away and went to every game we played in Texas....except at UTEP cause that might as well be in China.

Where is your faith then? Fuente has us trending up.

I like Fuente and he does. I was making a joke to Kronke whom I have a posting report with from the Soccer Thread.

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:35 AM)grapes Wrote:  I like them both.
We should let Tulane know we've changed our minds.
I don't understand their add..


can someone explain the value of tulane.....

Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Name someone.

Name another school not in a BCS conf. that has the recruiting foot print that Tulane adds. Name another school that is a destination for other schools to travel too and have a good time before, during and after the game?

In the past ten years Tulane has built a baseball stadium, basketball/volleyball practice facility, redone the basketball arena, building a new on campus football stadium. Tulane has also increased money to the athletic department/coaching staffs.

Tulane will be getting a new president and AD soon as well.

I understand that our past is crappy. But our future is promising.

Mods, if this doesn't belong in the Smack Forum, I don't know what does. Can this please be moved?

(01-27-2014 01:04 AM)DUPERGREENIE Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:35 AM)grapes Wrote:  I like them both.
We should let Tulane know we've changed our minds.
I don't understand their add..


can someone explain the value of tulane.....

Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Name someone.

Name another school not in a BCS conf. that has the recruiting foot print that Tulane adds. Name another school that is a destination for other schools to travel too and have a good time before, during and after the game?

In the past ten years Tulane has built a baseball stadium, basketball/volleyball practice facility, redone the basketball arena, building a new on campus football stadium. Tulane has also increased money to the athletic department/coaching staffs.

Tulane will be getting a new president and AD soon as well.

I understand that our past is crappy. But our future is promising.

I'd rather have Tulane than any of ULALA ULM or LaTech.

(01-27-2014 12:40 AM)shere khan Wrote:  drunk post, just let it go....lol .. i get one or two every ten years or so...come on guys i already apologized

Drunk post? Really?

You started a brand new thread about this nonsense.

I think this was a great thread, and I agree.

I spent a year in Texas and never felt welcome, so I have a bias against the state.

I also think it's BS that Houston and SMU got invited to this conference before we did and comparing basketball gyms makes me want to vomit. I know, football, football, football. But there football stadiums are mostly empty too.

The whole thing makes me sick.

(01-27-2014 12:40 AM)shere khan Wrote:  drunk post, just let it go....lol .. i get one or two every ten years or so...come on guys i already apologized

Drunk? That might be a believable excuse if you didn't troll daily here. More like continued idiot posting in general.

"i get one or two every ten years or so" ... You make a post almost daily that is so stupid it decreases the overall IQ of the board.

At least trolls like Miko throw in humor. Something for you to strive for perhaps.

(01-27-2014 01:10 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 01:04 AM)DUPERGREENIE Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:35 AM)grapes Wrote:  I like them both.
We should let Tulane know we've changed our minds.
I don't understand their add..


can someone explain the value of tulane.....

Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Name someone.

Name another school not in a BCS conf. that has the recruiting foot print that Tulane adds. Name another school that is a destination for other schools to travel too and have a good time before, during and after the game?

In the past ten years Tulane has built a baseball stadium, basketball/volleyball practice facility, redone the basketball arena, building a new on campus football stadium. Tulane has also increased money to the athletic department/coaching staffs.

Tulane will be getting a new president and AD soon as well.

I understand that our past is crappy. But our future is promising.

I'd rather have Tulane than any of ULALA ULM or LaTech.

Why's that? I mean, without question Tulane is a fine academic institution...best in the state, even. But the AAC is an ATHLETIC conference, right?

I know all this is subjective and kicking Houston and SMU out are completely hypothetical...AIN'T HAPPENIN'...but why is Tulane hands-down a better selection in your opinion than at least 2 of the other 3?

So why can I post Cougar High but not post Tiger high?

(01-27-2014 01:10 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 01:04 AM)DUPERGREENIE Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:39 AM)grapes Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 12:35 AM)grapes Wrote:  I like them both.
We should let Tulane know we've changed our minds.
I don't understand their add..


can someone explain the value of tulane.....

Potential Vanderbilt or Duke. It's not like they've never been good before, either.

Idk, why not find someone who is constantly good rather than hope on potential?

Name someone.

Name another school not in a BCS conf. that has the recruiting foot print that Tulane adds. Name another school that is a destination for other schools to travel too and have a good time before, during and after the game?

In the past ten years Tulane has built a baseball stadium, basketball/volleyball practice facility, redone the basketball arena, building a new on campus football stadium. Tulane has also increased money to the athletic department/coaching staffs.

Tulane will be getting a new president and AD soon as well.

I understand that our past is crappy. But our future is promising.

I'd rather have Tulane than any of ULALA ULM or LaTech.

Perhpas for the moment, yes.

The fact that for the most part SMU and Houston fans didn't react shows how little we care about Memphis fans think. Nice try though…well actually, it was a pretty lame try but whatever.

SMU & Houston to the Pac 12 it is!!!! Bye Mempfist

One Memphis fan says something about SMU & Houston and yall act as if the whole fan base is bashing.
I like SMU & Houston and i know a lot of Memphis fans who do to.
So calm down.

"Pac 12" ..... yeah ok best of luck