Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Espn bracketology
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
UofToledoFans Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,682
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Toledo and G5
Location:
Post: #1
Espn bracketology
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

Joe has Toledo has the MAC rep at a 12 seed which means we are probably close to a bubble. Last week Akron was the MAC rep at a 15 seed.
01-25-2014 01:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Rocket A Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,023
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: 'Nati
Post: #2
RE: Espn bracketology
of the four #5 seeds in that draw Louisville seems to be the most difficult.

I like CBS's projection, would love another shot at Xavier.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology
01-25-2014 08:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Sleepy Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,018
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: Sedro Woolley WA
Post: #3
RE: Espn bracketology
Toledo is ranked 64th in the RPI. Unfortunately, even if the Rockets were to win all their MAC games, that ranking is likely to go down due to the lower RPIs of the MAC opponents.

EMU 108, Akron 122, Buffalo 124, WMU 156, Kent 161, bugs 174, Miami 221, NIU 225, CMU 279, Balls 282,
01-25-2014 11:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofToledoFans Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,682
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Toledo and G5
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Espn bracketology
No it won't, because teams ahead will lose a lot more games. Toledo's rpi after a sweep of the rest of our schedule would be in the low 30's. OU twice, and EMU twice are the best two rpis outside of us.
01-25-2014 01:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pono Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,385
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 94
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Espn bracketology
how is xavier a 5 seed? they aren't that good. would take that draw in a second. usually the best place to be is in the 4/13, 5/12, or 6/11 games because you avoid top 10 type teams until the sweet 16 at the earliest. the rockets probably need to win the conf tourney to qualify as the sched doesn't have enough strong opponents. the rockets would maybe get in (or in the play in game) if they go 16-2 or 17-1 in the mac and lose the final of the conf tourney, but it would be a nail biter. if we go 16-2 in the league and win the tourney we would be 30-3 and might rise as high as 9 in the seeding which would might make for a lighter first game opponent but put us against a syracuse or arizona in game two if we make it that far.
01-25-2014 01:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T4C8 Offline
T4C8
*

Posts: 4,611
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 35
I Root For: U of Toledo
Location: Toledo
Post: #6
RE: Espn bracketology
Xavier lost again today. Pretty good team but i imagine theyll end up a 7 or 8 seed
01-25-2014 02:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Rocket A Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,023
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: 'Nati
Post: #7
RE: Espn bracketology
(01-25-2014 11:55 AM)Sleepy Wrote:  Toledo is ranked 64th in the RPI. Unfortunately, even if the Rockets were to win all their MAC games, that ranking is likely to go down due to the lower RPIs of the MAC opponents.

EMU 108, Akron 122, Buffalo 124, WMU 156, Kent 161, bugs 174, Miami 221, NIU 225, CMU 279, Balls 282,

Most websites I have checked have the Rockets with a much better RPI than 64.

NCAA.com has UT at 36

http://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball-...etball-rpi

ESPN.com 34

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rpi

Warrennolan.com 36

http://WarrenNolan.com/basketball/2014/c...d-American

realtimerpi.com 37

http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_Men.html
01-27-2014 06:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pono Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,385
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 94
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Espn bracketology
bracketology still doesn't have us close to an at large. need to win the mac tourney, unless we can win out in the conf reg season a loss in the mac tourney could relegate us to the NIT
01-30-2014 04:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jimrunsfar Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 133
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: Ft Worth
Post: #9
RE: Espn bracketology
Here's Lunardi's explanation of Toledo on the bubble...

http://insider.espn.go.com/mens-college-...src=mobile

If you assume a loss in the MAC Tourney final, it would be really hard to imagine a team with 4-5 losses and an RPI of less than 50 not getting an at large bid. But as Lunardi point's out, the committee has not been kind to The MAC over the years.....
01-30-2014 11:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
emanoh Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,747
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 22
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Espn bracketology
Not that I'm looking ahead, but here are the 2nd and 3rd round site locations for the tourney and the approx drive time from Toledo. A boy can dream, right?

2014 NCAA Second/Third Rounds (March 20-22)
Buffalo, NY – Driveable, 5 hrs
Milwaukee, WI – Driveable, 5.5 hrs.
Orlando, FL –Easy Flight
Spokane, WA – Tough Flight

2014 NCAA Second/Third Rounds (March 21-23)
Raleigh, NC – On the long end of driveable, 9 Hrs., Maybe Flight?
San Antonio, TX -Flight
San Diego, CA – Flight.
St. Louis Mo – Driveable, 7 hrs.
01-30-2014 11:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dwight Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,534
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 20
I Root For: Rockets
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Espn bracketology
(01-30-2014 11:03 AM)jimrunsfar Wrote:  Here's Lunardi's explanation of Toledo on the bubble...

http://insider.espn.go.com/mens-college-...src=mobile

If you assume a loss in the MAC Tourney final, it would be really hard to imagine a team with 4-5 losses and an RPI of less than 50 not getting an at large bid. But as Lunardi point's out, the committee has not been kind to The MAC over the years.....

Last year the Rocket women finished with three losses, including the tournament loss, and had an RPI of 46 (before the NIT and NCAA tournaments started) and still were left out. The men, I think, would need an RPI in the 30s to be guaranteed a spot. We are currently 36 (not counting the Miami game).
01-30-2014 03:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


T4C8 Offline
T4C8
*

Posts: 4,611
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 35
I Root For: U of Toledo
Location: Toledo
Post: #12
RE: Espn bracketology
realtimerpi has us at 29 today. i imagine if we only lose 2 games the rest of the way we would finish in the 30s. but to be safe i would say we need to only lose 1 game in the regular season to have an at large spot.

Or we can just FINALLY win the MAC tournament
01-30-2014 03:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
emanoh Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,747
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 22
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Espn bracketology
The only thing of relevance that dbag mentioned was our schedule. All mid-majors get knocked on our schedules because nobody from larger conferences will play us at our home gyms, they don't return our phone calls and will only play us if we luck our way into a post season tournament. There are some tough teams in the MAC this year and we don't get any consideration for playing our conference. Akron is not an easy win and we went to their gym and boot stomped them. I hope our team can stay focused through the tournament. I don't mind if we have a couple of mental lapses in the regular season, but come tourney time we need to control our own destiny. Not like football this year, don't put our destiny in the hands of idiots who don't know how to pick teams.

Looking at that link you can only read the little snip on Baylor and doesn't it suck when MAC teams don't get at-large bids and the national medial are still considering teams like Baylor who is 1-6 in their conference as bubble teams. WTF? That is how screwed up the NCAA is right now.
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2014 04:46 PM by emanoh.)
01-30-2014 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofToledoFans Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,682
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Toledo and G5
Location:
Post: #14
RE: Espn bracketology
When looking at the women's tourney from last season, the Big12 sent a below .500 team Kansas to the dance with a 60something rpi over Toledo and a few other schools. Every school but Drexel was knocked out in the first three rounds of WNIT, and Kansas won two games in the NCAA. So they actually in hind site probably got it right....not to mention the MAC hasn't won an NCAA Women's tourney game in a long time.
01-30-2014 05:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T-Town Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,061
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 20
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Espn bracketology
Lunardi is right about Toledo's bubble chances for an at large being ZERO---those slot are pretty much reserved for those 16-14 teams from the power conferences---- but he is just spouting the party line as far as the reasons he gives. The NCAA serves at the pleasure of the power conferences and at $1-1.5M per game played in the tourney, the Big Boys want get as many of their conference teams in the tourney as is humanly possible, so the selection criteria are subjective and varied enough---bad/good losses, bad/good wins, RPI, late losses (designed to keep mid-majors out unless they win their tourney), schedule, etc,etc----that they can always selectively find enough reasons to justify excluding anyone they want to exclude. Last year some naive optimists on the MAC board were debating before the MAC tourney about the possibility of Ohio and Akron both getting into the MAC------I foolishly joined the debate by offering the following data that I am reproducing here:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here are the data for the 68 teams in the 2012 NCAA Tournament:

31 Automatic Qualifiers and 37 At-Large teams (includes the "play-in games")

Look at the data and draw you own conclusions about the likelihood of the MAC getting 2 teams in (or the fairness of the system if you like).

Also please note that 3 of the 5 at large bids to "lesser conferences" (out of 37 total at large bids) went to conferences whose commissioner (or associate commissioner) was on the selection committee

_________________________________________________________

At Large Bids ---Conference----Selection Committee

The 8 "BIG" CONFERENCES ---- 32 at-large bids
3-Mountain West Conference
3-Atlantic 10 Conference------------Xavier AD
4-Atlantic Coast Conference---------Wake Forrest AD
5-Big 12 Conference-------------------Oklahoma AD
8-Big East Conference
5-Big Ten Conference-------------------Michigan AD
3-Southeastern Conference-------------LSU AD
1-Pac-10 Conference
Total =32

The OTHER 23 CONFERENCES ----- 5 at-large bids
America East Conference
Atlantic Sun Conference
Big Sky Conference--------------------Conference Commissioner
Big South Conference
Big West Conference
Colonial Athletic Association-----------Northeastern AD
1-Conference USA-------------------------Associate Commissioner
Horizon League
Ivy League
1-Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
Mid-American Conference
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
1-Missouri Valley Conference
Northeast Conference
Ohio Valley Conference
Patriot League
Southern Conference
Southland Conference
Southwestern Athletic Conference
Summit League
Sun Belt Conference
2-West Coast Conference-----------------------Commissioner
Western Athletic Conference------------------Utah State AD
Total =5
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

As is the case for collegiate football, men's basketball is no longer a sport, rather is a big $$$$$ major entertainment enterprise thanks to the TV dollars---- and the power conferences are in the drivers' seat. Unfortunately universities have become totally addicted to the money this system provides and are now its enablers. No surprise that the Northwestern players want to unionize.
01-30-2014 05:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofToledoFans Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,682
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Toledo and G5
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Espn bracketology
I have some faith that 1 loss at either EMU or OU, and a loss in the championship game would still get us in.
I firmly believe 1 loss in the semi's with the team who beat us winning the MAC tourney would still get us in.
I know a loss in the championship game being our only loss the rest of the year would get us in.
Anything with a Toledo rpi in the 30's would keep us in the dance. To do that 3/4 need to be own vs. OU and EMU. That starts this weekend!
01-30-2014 05:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


T-Town Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,061
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 20
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Espn bracketology
(01-30-2014 05:46 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  I have some faith that 1 loss at either EMU or OU, and a loss in the championship game would still get us in.
I firmly believe 1 loss in the semi's with the team who beat us winning the MAC tourney would still get us in.
I know a loss in the championship game being our only loss the rest of the year would get us in.
Anything with a Toledo rpi in the 30's would keep us in the dance. To do that 3/4 need to be own vs. OU and EMU. That starts this weekend!

Hopefully the Rockets will prevail in the MAC Tournament, so we will not have to test your faith. You may be right but I sure wouldn't want to have to rely on it for a bid.
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2014 06:08 PM by T-Town.)
01-30-2014 05:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Sleepy Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,018
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: Sedro Woolley WA
Post: #18
RE: Espn bracketology
(01-27-2014 06:22 PM)Rocket A Wrote:  
(01-25-2014 11:55 AM)Sleepy Wrote:  Toledo is ranked 64th in the RPI. Unfortunately, even if the Rockets were to win all their MAC games, that ranking is likely to go down due to the lower RPIs of the MAC opponents.

EMU 108, Akron 122, Buffalo 124, WMU 156, Kent 161, bugs 174, Miami 221, NIU 225, CMU 279, Balls 282,

Most websites I have checked have the Rockets with a much better RPI than 64.

NCAA.com has UT at 36

http://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball-...etball-rpi

ESPN.com 34

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rpi

Warrennolan.com 36

http://WarrenNolan.com/basketball/2014/c...d-American

realtimerpi.com 37

http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_Men.html

My mistake - I was looking at the ESPN BPI. I'm not sure why there is such a big discrepancy between the Rockets ranking on BPI vs RPI


http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bpi

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketba...-explained
01-30-2014 08:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
indianasniff Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,841
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 26
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #19
Espn bracketology
Wasting NRG folks. Win and you are IN. Period. Let's hang a banner that is meaningful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
01-30-2014 09:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
utpotts Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,969
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 97
I Root For: Toledo
Location: Canal Winchester, OH
Post: #20
RE: Espn bracketology
(01-30-2014 09:11 PM)indianasniff Wrote:  Wasting NRG folks. Win and you are IN. Period. Let's hang a banner that is meaningful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bingo!!!



01-30-2014 09:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.