Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

***georgia_tech_swagger*** · 01-10-2014 04:09 PM

BlazerFan11 · 01-11-2014 11:48 AM

Stupid dog. He was supposed to go get the fire department.

bitcruncher · 01-12-2014 04:10 PM

I don't think the dog is that stupid. It got somebody that could document the fire for the insurance company. That could help with the settlement. That's pretty good thinking for a dog, if you ask me.

DrTorch · 01-13-2014 08:39 AM

(01-11-2014 11:48 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: Stupid dog. He was supposed to go get the fire department.

Worse than that, it was the dog who was playing with matches after being told not to! 03-banghead

bitcruncher · 01-13-2014 05:20 PM

That shoots down my insurance theory.

BlazerFan11 · 01-14-2014 11:31 AM

(01-13-2014 05:20 PM)bitcruncher Wrote: That shoots down my insurance theory.

Not really. This way, the homeowners could honestly say they didn't set the fire.

"No, Mr. Claims Adjuster, we only taught him that so he could light our smokes for us."

Wolfman · 01-16-2014 09:23 PM

Smart dog. Stupid police. They couldn't see a fire that was close enough to melt their tires?

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode Smart dog is smart.
Author	Message