I was trying to help you. Honestly. marving and lenetzach were the ones you should have an issue with.

I happen to agree with you, as well as I suggested you ignore them.

But, sure, I'm a jerk/punk.

(12-15-2013 07:16 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:12 PM)cwise Wrote:  Joe it's not baseball. You left out the word starting, which led to the criticism you received. Then you bitched about that. Then I tried to mediate the situation and point out WHY people responded that way. Now you imply I should have inferred your meaning.

I'm not a freaking mind reader. You'll make a fantastic wife one day.

ok I guess. but you have already made a great punk/jerk.

He kind of is man, you should know the guy

(12-15-2013 07:19 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:16 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:12 PM)cwise Wrote:  Joe it's not baseball. You left out the word starting, which led to the criticism you received. Then you bitched about that. Then I tried to mediate the situation and point out WHY people responded that way. Now you imply I should have inferred your meaning.

I'm not a freaking mind reader. You'll make a fantastic wife one day.

ok I guess. but you have already made a great punk/jerk.

He kind of is man, you should know the guy

Suck it fry

(12-15-2013 07:20 PM)cwise Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:19 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:16 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:12 PM)cwise Wrote:  Joe it's not baseball. You left out the word starting, which led to the criticism you received. Then you bitched about that. Then I tried to mediate the situation and point out WHY people responded that way. Now you imply I should have inferred your meaning.

I'm not a freaking mind reader. You'll make a fantastic wife one day.

ok I guess. but you have already made a great punk/jerk.

He kind of is man, you should know the guy

Suck it fry

Whoa there, no need to get all hormonal on me now.

(12-15-2013 07:19 PM)cwise Wrote:  I was trying to help you. Honestly. marving and lenetzach were the ones you should have an issue with.

I happen to agree with you, as well as I suggested you ignore them.

But, sure, I'm a jerk/punk.

I do have a problem with them. trust me, when you cant post your opinion there is a problem. I only called you a punk because you said I would make a good wife, you can understand that right.?

You thought I should know you meant something when it's not what you said. From my experience, that's very "wife-ish."

I enjoy your posts, and I also miss the days of honest or critical discourse. That's nearly unheard of now at MT.org.

Let's just agree that anyone who goes by homefry has some mental issues.

(12-15-2013 07:22 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:19 PM)cwise Wrote:  I was trying to help you. Honestly. marving and lenetzach were the ones you should have an issue with.

I happen to agree with you, as well as I suggested you ignore them.

But, sure, I'm a jerk/punk.

I do have a problem with them. trust me, when you cant post your opinion there is a problem. I only called you a punk because you said I would make a good wife, you can understand that right.?

He makes a good wife too

I kind of assumed you meant starting, but since it clearly makes no difference in the amount of time played or impact on the game, I couldn't figure out the point.

So I guess it's clear that you want him to start, but the upshot of the post is not about who gets their name announced but rather playing time and impact on the game.

That has nothing to do with all of the motivations people are making up. It's just that I truly don't understand why the post reads like Chris might be prevented from playing, when he played 34 minutes in the previous game.

I was in fact actually confused about what the point was.

(12-15-2013 07:32 PM)lenetzach Wrote:  I kind of assumed you meant starting, but since it clearly makes no difference in the amount of time played or impact on the game, I couldn't figure out the point.

So I guess it's clear that you want him to start, but the upshot of the post is not about who gets their name announced but rather playing time and impact on the game.

That has nothing to do with all of the motivations people are making up. It's just that I truly don't understand why the post reads like Chris might be prevented from playing, when he played 34 minutes in the previous game.

I was in fact actually confused about what the point was.

I was confused too. I wasn't sure what the purpose of the thread was. It's arguing something that no one disagrees with...except maybe Homefry.

Don't know if it was true or not, but the announcers seemed to have the impression that Chris was going to be held out to allow his sprain to heal for the Florida game. They mentioned the luxury of our depth to be able to do that.

The lackadaisical start to the UALR game put a stop to that notion.

(12-15-2013 08:12 PM)mairving Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:32 PM)lenetzach Wrote:  I kind of assumed you meant starting, but since it clearly makes no difference in the amount of time played or impact on the game, I couldn't figure out the point.

So I guess it's clear that you want him to start, but the upshot of the post is not about who gets their name announced but rather playing time and impact on the game.

That has nothing to do with all of the motivations people are making up. It's just that I truly don't understand why the post reads like Chris might be prevented from playing, when he played 34 minutes in the previous game.

I was in fact actually confused about what the point was.

I was confused too. I wasn't sure what the purpose of the thread was. It's arguing something that no one disagrees with...except maybe Homefry.

?

The wolfpack/gang mentality on here is absolutely hilarious.

(12-15-2013 09:18 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  The wolfpack/gang mentality on here is absolutely hilarious.

all I was trying to say was I hope Crawford would be put back in the starting lineup based on he played against ualr and also based on how Dixon played. Dixon played very poor.

(12-15-2013 07:13 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 07:06 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 06:49 PM)cwise Wrote:  Joe, FWIW, you post doesn't mention the STARTING lineup, just the lineup. Enough passive aggressive. Learn to not let some of the sheeple bother you.

Thats what they do, act like theyve got it all figured out and the rest of us are morons. God forbid a fan like Joe make a post encouraging a player to return to the lineup and have a good game.

It's the same old crap. I dont get it Homefry, why have a message board if you aren't going to talk about the coach, starting lineups, players, player performances, the type of offense or defense the team and coach runs, ect.? I guess the message board with some has to be like this....."hooray for our team, we are the best, Dixon is the best scorer on the planet, our coach is the greatest coach of all time". then they would post "I agree" and thus the end of the thread and message board.

Nah, you got it all wrong. It's here for to whine, biitch, complain and call each other names.

(12-15-2013 09:18 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  The wolfpack/gang mentality on here is absolutely hilarious.

No shtt. It's the reason most people have left and won't come back.

This guy is just hoping a player returns to the lineup and you clowns act like he wants to fire the coach.

(12-15-2013 09:28 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(12-15-2013 09:18 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  The wolfpack/gang mentality on here is absolutely hilarious.

all I was trying to say was I hope Crawford would be put back in the starting lineup based on he played against ualr and also based on how Dixon played. Dixon played very poor.

But you never said that until you edited your post hence the confusion. As far as Crawford starting I honestly don't think it matters. He will certainly get a lot of minutes unless injury or foul trouble. I certainly respect your opinion.

Dixon, while a great scorer, has shown a propensity to run hot/cold. Either way so far he's always looking for his shot. That's a lot more acceptable quality from a scorer off the bench. Chris, even when not making shots, keeps the offensive flowing and gets the ball to the bigs.

(12-15-2013 10:38 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  This guy is just hoping a player returns to the lineup and you clowns act like he wants to fire the coach.

You got that right. It's amazing in a dumb way.

So, Is Hipp going to start or what?