(12-12-2013 10:37 AM)emu79 Wrote: Let me remark back,
Wristen I can't go into detail but I believe those interviewing were caught by surprise by his past er domestic incident. I did have a problem with Wristen and I believe after learning that those interviewing hit the eject button.
I too heard from my 'sources' the word 'baggage' for Wristen.
I'm shocked that this would happen.
His 'baggage' was NOT a surprise.
Google or EMU Eagle's Nest had no problems finding it. I found it within 10 minutes of seeing his name here but opted NOT to post it. Someone else found it and informed me. Neither of us opted to post it.
And, of course, a search firm would have or should have found it easily by asking the question on a questionnaire or Googling. Junior high schools kids can Google a person and find baggage. (rule of thumb on the Internet: "You can't unring the bell". Once the bell has been rung, it has been rung.... )
My guess: EMU knew and decided to see 'how it played out'. If the search committee or BOR didn't have problems with Wristen's baggage he might have been the man. If they did, he simply would not be offered the position.
Sounds like his baggage stuck out like a sore thumb.
I wonder if that is why he is still at CSU-P and not at a bigger program?????