(12-02-2013 01:35 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 01:30 PM)axeme Wrote:  No divisions, 12 conf. games--everyone plays everyone else for, no OOC games. Problem solved. :jaw drop:


Of course, then everyone would ***** about whom they had to play on the road instead of bitching about who had the weakest schedule. And think how it would seriously screw up SOS rankings because no one would have any games outside the conference to give relative weight.

Get rid of some of the conf members then. First one certainly comes to mind as they've done nothing but siphon off bowl game earnings.

Ohio?

(12-02-2013 01:35 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 01:30 PM)axeme Wrote:  No divisions, 12 conf. games--everyone plays everyone else for, no OOC games. Problem solved. :jaw drop:


Of course, then everyone would ***** about whom they had to play on the road instead of bitching about who had the weakest schedule. And think how it would seriously screw up SOS rankings because no one would have any games outside the conference to give relative weight.

Get rid of some of the conf members then. First one certainly comes to mind as they've done nothing but siphon off bowl game earnings.

Curious who you are talking about. UMass has gotten a grand total of $0 from the conference bowl games so far, so it can't be the Minutemen.

(12-02-2013 04:04 PM)jjmc85 Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 01:35 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 01:30 PM)axeme Wrote:  No divisions, 12 conf. games--everyone plays everyone else for, no OOC games. Problem solved. :jaw drop:


Of course, then everyone would ***** about whom they had to play on the road instead of bitching about who had the weakest schedule. And think how it would seriously screw up SOS rankings because no one would have any games outside the conference to give relative weight.

Get rid of some of the conf members then. First one certainly comes to mind as they've done nothing but siphon off bowl game earnings.

Curious who you are talking about. UMass has gotten a grand total of $0 from the conference bowl games so far, so it can't be the Minutemen.

It was the butler.

(12-02-2013 04:04 PM)jjmc85 Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 01:35 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 01:30 PM)axeme Wrote:  No divisions, 12 conf. games--everyone plays everyone else for, no OOC games. Problem solved. :jaw drop:


Of course, then everyone would ***** about whom they had to play on the road instead of bitching about who had the weakest schedule. And think how it would seriously screw up SOS rankings because no one would have any games outside the conference to give relative weight.

Get rid of some of the conf members then. First one certainly comes to mind as they've done nothing but siphon off bowl game earnings.

Curious who you are talking about. UMass has gotten a grand total of $0 from the conference bowl games so far, so it can't be the Minutemen.

Most likely another veiled slap at EMU.

I have been told quality wins are more important than losses over and over by the same poster on this board. I ranked the teams and included all wins vs. teams with 4-4 or greater records and named those schools. Where did i call out a school?

I included the kent record because I believe they deserve to be in that tier with their head to head win over a 4-4 team, and them being very competitive in the Wagon Wheel game. Personally I don't think CMU is on the level with UT so I have them slightly above OU, which they beat on the road by a few points. HOLY CRAP