HuronDave
Heisman
Posts: 5,772
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 57
I Root For: The MAC
Location:
|
NMR: Rutgers home attendance
|
|
11-27-2013 12:58 PM |
|
MidnightBlueGold
Heisman
Posts: 9,359
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 45
I Root For: TOL-EDO
Location: The Glass Bowl
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
Good job on picking Rutgers, P1G!
|
|
11-27-2013 01:09 PM |
|
thanksjim
All American
Posts: 3,166
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 23
I Root For: KSU
Location:
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
Rutgers is trending up! They had 466 in attendance in a tough 73-72 loss to Fairleigh Dickinson.
(This post was last modified: 11-27-2013 01:38 PM by thanksjim.)
|
|
11-27-2013 01:38 PM |
|
emu steve
Legend
Posts: 39,586
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 86
I Root For: EMU / MAC
Location: DMV - D.C. area
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
(11-27-2013 01:38 PM)thanksjim Wrote: Rutgers is trending up! They had 466 in attendance in a tough 73-72 loss to Fairleigh Dickinson.
Is it too late to rescind their admittance into the B1G?
The bigger story, I think, is that the B1G picked two dubious (?) schools, Rutgers and Maryland, almost solely because of television markets.
Everyone knew the B1G had to take PSU hoops to get PSU FB (B1G doesn't do FB only membership ) but what is there to like about Maryland FB or Rutgers hoops?
Does the B1G think they can turn a sow's ear into a silk purse?
|
|
11-28-2013 05:28 AM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
(11-28-2013 05:28 AM)emu steve Wrote: (11-27-2013 01:38 PM)thanksjim Wrote: Rutgers is trending up! They had 466 in attendance in a tough 73-72 loss to Fairleigh Dickinson.
Is it too late to rescind their admittance into the B1G?
The bigger story, I think, is that the B1G picked two dubious (?) schools, Rutgers and Maryland, almost solely because of television markets.
I was very surprised to see the B1G take RU and UMd, I saw no point since B1G alumni in those regions are legion, and they'd want the BTN. However, given the proliferation of conference networks, I can see the B1G being pre-emptive, and not losing presence in these major markets.
Quote:Everyone knew the B1G had to take PSU hoops to get PSU FB (B1G doesn't do FB only membership ) but what is there to like about Maryland FB or Rutgers hoops?
Does the B1G think they can turn a sow's ear into a silk purse?
That's the big question. UMd and RU will be horrible in virtually every sport. RU will compete in w bball. UMd will compete in lacrosse, maybe soccer, and occasionally m bball, and UMd will lose a bunch of money to as buyout to the ACC.
But, will they improve? Possibly. Years ago you could count on N'western or Vanderbilt sucking, but in the past 20 years, virtually any team can come out and compete for a conference title. Maybe UMd and RU will rise to the level of competition, but that will have to come from major improvements in out of state recruiting for fball.
|
|
11-28-2013 07:56 AM |
|
arrows80
Special Teams
Posts: 678
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 5
I Root For: MSU, CMU
Location:
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
Next year alone, Rutgers gets Penn State, Michigan, and Wisconsin at home in football.
All three of those schools travel VERY well. The Knights will sell some tickets next year, no matter how good or bad the team is. This move is a home run for them, and the $$$$$ they receive will help improve facilities and such.
Both schools will be fine - maybe Minnesota/Purdue/Illinois fine, but fine nonetheless.
|
|
11-28-2013 09:26 AM |
|
niu79
All American
Posts: 3,725
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 6
I Root For: NIU
Location:
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
Adding Rutgers and Maryland will not help the Big 10's strength of schedule to make the Final 4 playoff, so the TV money is definitely what it is all about. Driving on 294 by O'Hare I went past the Big 10 Network TV studios. OMG.
|
|
11-28-2013 09:55 AM |
|
emu steve
Legend
Posts: 39,586
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 86
I Root For: EMU / MAC
Location: DMV - D.C. area
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
(11-27-2013 01:38 PM)thanksjim Wrote: Rutgers is trending up! They had 466 in attendance in a tough 73-72 loss to Fairleigh Dickinson.
Even EMU fans are snarking at Rutgers. We're almost doubling that numberfor our last non-conference games.
|
|
11-28-2013 10:37 AM |
|
OUBobcat9092
2nd String
Posts: 268
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 3
I Root For: Ohio
Location:
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
(11-28-2013 10:37 AM)emu steve Wrote: (11-27-2013 01:38 PM)thanksjim Wrote: Rutgers is trending up! They had 466 in attendance in a tough 73-72 loss to Fairleigh Dickinson.
Even EMU fans are snarking at Rutgers. We're almost doubling that numberfor our last non-conference games.
Rutgers, when you are subject to derision from EMU, you really can't get much lower.
I've seen more fans in attendance at an ABA/D-League game....
|
|
11-28-2013 10:44 AM |
|
NIU007
Legend
Posts: 34,261
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 318
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
(11-28-2013 10:37 AM)emu steve Wrote: (11-27-2013 01:38 PM)thanksjim Wrote: Rutgers is trending up! They had 466 in attendance in a tough 73-72 loss to Fairleigh Dickinson.
Even EMU fans are snarking at Rutgers. We're almost doubling that numberfor our last non-conference games.
Heck, we get more than 466 and we win about as often as the Washington Generals.
|
|
11-28-2013 02:27 PM |
|
mikeinsec127
1st String
Posts: 1,992
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 118
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
|
RE: NMR: Rutgers home attendance
(11-27-2013 12:58 PM)HuronDave Wrote: I am probably going to regret this, but with all the nonsense on this board about attendance, thought it would be worth pointing out Rutgers' recent attendance at a home basketball game: 392.
http://www.dailytargum.com/sports/mens_b...0f31a.html
Not that our attendence is great, but lets get the facts strait. This was a previously unscheduled consolation game. There was no advertising and very little notice that the game would be played.
|
|
11-28-2013 08:54 PM |
|