for 28 years

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/for....html?_r=0

(10-11-2013 12:24 PM)bevotex Wrote:  for 28 years

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/for....html?_r=0

Who?

A black Irish man who's a former mayor of Detroit.

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016 now Free

(10-11-2013 01:51 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 12:24 PM)bevotex Wrote:  for 28 years

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/for....html?_r=0

Who?

This the best ya got?

(10-11-2013 01:54 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 01:51 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 12:24 PM)bevotex Wrote:  for 28 years

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/for....html?_r=0

Who?

This the best ya got?

For being a "liberal poster child", I sure know little about him.

Yeah, never heard of him either.

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

(10-11-2013 02:08 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

(10-11-2013 02:14 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:08 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

Stop embarrassing yourself.

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Watch Fox news once in a while and you can find out what MSNBC doesn't want you to know.

(10-11-2013 02:26 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Watch Fox news once in a while and you can find out what MSNBC doesn't want you to know.

So, if he is a person who has not been covered at all in the liberal media, even when he wasn't charged of criminal activity...

How is he a "liberal poster boy"?

(10-11-2013 02:14 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:08 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

Now, now. Who called him "boy"? Some could find offense in the rather cavalier way you refer to this guy. He's not your "boy" and I'd think someone of your tolerant, enlightened, leftist bent wouldn't allude to him in such a way.

For shame.

(10-11-2013 02:14 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:08 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

Try reading the article. A consultant from his campaign called him that. HIS CAMPAIGN!!!!

“He’s become the poster child of what went wrong with the city and why it went bankrupt,” said Adolph Mongo, a political consultant who worked for Mr. Kilpatrick’s re-election campaign.

(10-11-2013 02:36 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:14 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:08 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

Try reading the article. A consultant from his campaign called him that. HIS CAMPAIGN!!!!

“He’s become the poster child of what went wrong with the city and why it went bankrupt,” said Adolph Mongo, a political consultant who worked for Mr. Kilpatrick’s re-election campaign.

A poster child for the city is a poster child for the Democratic Party now?

What a solid, well-reasoned comparison!

(10-11-2013 02:38 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:36 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:14 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:08 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

Try reading the article. A consultant from his campaign called him that. HIS CAMPAIGN!!!!

“He’s become the poster child of what went wrong with the city and why it went bankrupt,” said Adolph Mongo, a political consultant who worked for Mr. Kilpatrick’s re-election campaign.

A poster child for the city is a poster child for the Democratic Party now?

What a solid, well-reasoned comparison!

Well, he's not a republican, so what does that leave? Are you going to argue every point with stupd comment?

(10-11-2013 02:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:38 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:36 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:14 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:08 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Not surprising that neither of you guys are up to speed on this either...

Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

Try reading the article. A consultant from his campaign called him that. HIS CAMPAIGN!!!!

“He’s become the poster child of what went wrong with the city and why it went bankrupt,” said Adolph Mongo, a political consultant who worked for Mr. Kilpatrick’s re-election campaign.

A poster child for the city is a poster child for the Democratic Party now?

What a solid, well-reasoned comparison!

Well, he's not a republican, so what does that leave? Are you going to argue every point with stupd comment?

Then obviously Rick Renzi is the poster child for the Right.

(10-11-2013 02:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:38 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:36 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:14 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  Calling a man that most liberals know little about a "poster child" is a mark of ignorance.

Just because he's a liberal and he's done something bad doesn't make him a poster boy.

Try reading the article. A consultant from his campaign called him that. HIS CAMPAIGN!!!!

“He’s become the poster child of what went wrong with the city and why it went bankrupt,” said Adolph Mongo, a political consultant who worked for Mr. Kilpatrick’s re-election campaign.

A poster child for the city is a poster child for the Democratic Party now?

What a solid, well-reasoned comparison!

Well, he's not a republican, so what does that leave? Are you going to argue every point with stupd comment?

Then obviously Rick Renzi is the poster child for the Right.

No. Renzi is a crook, that makes him a poster child for the left.

Just think how many people would be going to prison if there was some way to hold the Obama administration accountable.

(10-11-2013 02:26 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Watch Fox news once in a while and you can find out what MSNBC doesn't want you to know.

Fox news is a channel I watch if I want a good chuckle. Sometimes I wonder if the people at Fox believe what they say, or are just laughing on the inside while taking the poor unsuspecting viewer's money.

(10-11-2013 03:17 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:26 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 02:07 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yeah, never heard of him either.

Watch Fox news once in a while and you can find out what MSNBC doesn't want you to know.

Fox news is a channel I watch if I want a good chuckle. Sometimes I wonder if the people at Fox believe what they say, or are just laughing on the inside while taking the poor unsuspecting viewer's money.

Do you also chuckle when you see how badly Fox beats out your outlet in the ratings?