Thanks for showing your ignorance of what transpired.

I can't help it that we weren't motivated to play a crappy ECU team in the GMAC bowl just like you can't help it that when we did decide to impose our will your team was helpless.

Oh, and I like how you throw out years that don't suite you. Now you want to start at 2007 and forget the first two years of CUSA 2.0? You're a joke.

(10-09-2013 02:33 PM)banker Wrote:  Thanks for showing your ignorance of what transpired.

I can't help it that we weren't motivated to play a crappy ECU team in the GMAC bowl just like you can't help it that when we did decide to impose our will your team was helpless.

Oh, and I like how you throw out years that don't suite you. Now you want to start at 2007 and forget the first two years of CUSA 2.0? You're a joke.

Marshall is by far the best team. These polls are wrong and Marshall should be ranked in the top 25. I laugh at your facts and statistics and ohio is really good too.

(10-09-2013 09:18 AM)banker Wrote:  Dominant - commanding, controlling, or prevailing over all others.

ECU has not been dominant. Dominant is like Marshall winning 5 straight MAC titles.

#vacated

(10-07-2013 07:10 PM)banker Wrote:  And people accuse me of starting crap? Really?

SJ, if a team plays Alabama, Oregon, Stanford and LSU in OOC play and goes 0-4 does that mean they are good? In your eyes it make them great because they played the #1 toughest schedule apparently.

UNC is not a good football team this year. I understand why you want to think they are, to give more value to your rare win over them, but they are not the same team they were last year. They are 1-4, probably look at 1-5. They need a heck of a run to get bowl eligible this year.

That's your MO though, overvalue everything ECU does and undervalue everything anyone else does. UNT beating Ball State is a good win. According to Sagarin ECU has beaten #128 ODU, #97 FAU, #74 UNC and #108 MTSU. Ball State is #63. Ball State has as many FBS victories than the 4 teams you have beaten combined.

^^^
This is why I thank the Creator every damn day we are getting out of this crap hole of a conference......when beating Ball St is considered to be a big win. WTF?

(10-09-2013 02:33 PM)banker Wrote:  Thanks for showing your ignorance of what transpired.

I can't help it that we weren't motivated to play a crappy ECU team in the GMAC bowl just like you can't help it that when we did decide to impose our will your team was helpless.

Oh, and I like how you throw out years that don't suite you. Now you want to start at 2007 and forget the first two years of CUSA 2.0? You're a joke.

Since this is a college football rankings thread here goes:

2005 CUSA East
ECU 2nd
Marshall 6th

2006
ECU 2nd
Marshall 3rd


You know the rest of the years. The only year that Marshall ranked higher in CUSA East was 2011, when they had a 5-3 record to ECU's 4-4 record. Otherwise ECU has finished higher each year than Marshall.


http://espn.go.com/college-football/stan.../year/2011

(10-09-2013 04:12 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 02:33 PM)banker Wrote:  Thanks for showing your ignorance of what transpired.

I can't help it that we weren't motivated to play a crappy ECU team in the GMAC bowl just like you can't help it that when we did decide to impose our will your team was helpless.

Oh, and I like how you throw out years that don't suite you. Now you want to start at 2007 and forget the first two years of CUSA 2.0? You're a joke.

Since this is a college football rankings thread here goes:

2005 CUSA East
ECU 2nd
Marshall 6th

2006
ECU 2nd
Marshall 3rd


You know the rest of the years. The only year that Marshall ranked higher in CUSA East was 2011, when they had a 5-3 record to ECU's 4-4 record. Otherwise ECU has finished higher each year than Marshall.


http://espn.go.com/college-football/stan.../year/2011

What about all those MAC titles? Something like 5 in a row....Maybe they should go back the MAC, wait...err....Ohio?....nevermind.

USA Today Re-Ranking List 1-125

1. Alabama (5-0, 2-0)
2. Oregon (5-0, 2-0)
3. Stanford (5-0, 3-0)
4. Ohio State (6-0, 2-0)
5. Clemson (5-0, 3-0)
6. Florida State (5-0, 3-0)
7. Oklahoma (5-0, 2-0)
8. Georgia (4-1, 3-0)
9. Texas A&M (4-1, 1-1)
10. Baylor (4-0, 1-0)
11. LSU (5-1, 2-1)
12. UCLA (4-0, 1-0)
13. Miami (Fla.) (5-0, 1-0)
14. Washington (4-1, 1-1)
15. Louisville (5-0, 1-0)
16. South Carolina (4-1, 2-1)
17. Michigan (5-0, 1-0)
18. Fresno State (5-0, 2-0)
19. Florida (4-1, 3-0)
20. Northwestern (4-1, 0-1)
21. Northern Illinois (5-0, 1-0)
22. Texas Tech (5-0, 2-0) – UP 6
23. Virginia Tech (5-1, 2-0)
24. Missouri (5-0, 1-0) – UP 11
25. Notre Dame (4-2, 0-0) – UP 6

26. Oklahoma State (4-1, 1-1)
27. Auburn (4-1, 2-1) – UP 10
28. Wisconsin (3-2, 1-1)
29. Michigan State (4-1, 1-0)
30. Nebraska (4-1, 1-0)
31. Arizona State (3-2, 1-1) – DOWN 11
32. UCF (4-1, 1-0)
33. Oregon State (4-1, 2-0)
34. Ball State (5-1, 2-0) – UP 11
35. Mississippi (3-2, 1-2) – DOWN 11
36. Boise State (3-2, 1-1)
37. Brigham Young (3-2, 0-0)
38. Maryland (4-1, 0-1) – DOWN 16
39. East Carolina (4-1, 1-0)
40. Georgia Tech (3-2, 2-2)
41. Rutgers (4-1, 1-0)
42. Arizona (3-1, 0-1)
43. Texas (3-2, 2-0)
44. Bowling Green (5-1, 2-0) – UP 9
45. Ohio (4-1, 1-0)
46. Pittsburgh (3-1, 2-1) – UP 12
47. Navy (3-1, 0-0) – UP 13
48. Washington State (4-2, 2-1) – UP 16
49. Utah (3-2, 0-2)
50. Marshall (3-2, 1-0)

51. TCU (2-3, 0-2)
52. USC (3-2, 0-2)
53. Arkansas (3-3, 0-2)
54. Indiana (3-2, 1-0) – UP 12
55. Penn State (3-2, 0-1) – DOWN 22
56. Kansas State (2-3, 0-2)
57. Iowa (4-2, 1-1)
58. Utah State (3-3, 2-0) – DOWN 11
59. Houston (4-0, 1-0)
60. Louisiana-Lafayette (3-2, 1-0) – UP 10
61. Vanderbilt (3-3, 0-3)
62. Tennessee (3-3, 0-2)
63. West Virginia (3-3, 1-2)
64. Mississippi State (2-3, 0-2)
65. Wake Forest (3-3, 1-2)
66. Rice (3-2, 2-0) – UP 17
67. North Carolina State (3-2, 0-2) – DOWN 14
68. Illinois (3-2, 0-1)
69. Toledo (3-3, 2-1)
70. Arkansas State (2-3, 1-0)
71. Minnesota (4-2, 0-2)
72. Tulane (4-2, 2-0) – UP 15
73. Boston College (3-2, 1-1)
74. North Texas (2-3, 0-1)
75. UNC (1-4, 0-2) – DOWN 13

76. Iowa State (1-3, 0-1) – UP 6
77. Duke (3-2, 0-2)
78. Western Kentucky (4-2, 1-1)
79. Wyoming (3-2, 1-0)
80. Virginia (2-3, 0-1) – DOWN 11
81. San Jose State (2-3, 1-1)
82. Texas State (3-2, 0-1) – DOWN 11
83. Nevada (3-3, 2-1)
84. Middle Tennessee State (3-3, 1-1)
85. Cincinnati (3-2, 0-1) – DOWN 22
86. Syracuse (2-3, 0-1) – DOWN 12
87. Troy (3-3, 1-1)
88. Buffalo (3-2, 1-0)
89. San Diego State (2-3, 1-0) - UP 13
90. Tulsa (1-4, 0-1) – DOWN 7
91. UTSA (2-4, 1-1)
92. SMU (1-4, 0-1)
93. UNLV (3-2, 1-0)
94. California (1-4, 0-2)
95. Purdue (1-4, 0-1)
96. Air Force (1-5, 0-4)
97. Kentucky (1-4, 0-2)
98. South Alabama (2-3, 1-1)
99. Louisiana-Monroe (2-4, 0-1) – DOWN 11
100. Colorado (2-2, 0-2)

101. Colorado State (2-3, 0-0)
102. New Mexico (2-3, 0-1)
103. Kent State (2-4, 1-2)
104. Army (2-4, 0-0)
105. Kansas (2-2, 0-1) – DOWN 8
106. Florida Atlantic (2-4, 1-1)
107. Louisiana Tech (2-4, 1-1) – UP 7
108. Memphis (1-3, 0-1)
109. Connecticut (0-4, 0-0)
110. Akron (1-5, 0-2)
111. UTEP (1-4, 0-2)
112. Central Michigan (2-4, 1-1)
113. Hawaii (0-5, 0-3)
114. South Florida (1-4, 1-0)
115. UAB (1-4, 0-1) – DOWN 10
116. Eastern Michigan (1-4, 0-2)
117. Idaho (1-5, 0-0)
118. Temple (0-5, 0-2)
119. Florida International (1-4, 1-0)
120. Western Michigan (0-6, 0-2)
121. Miami (Ohio) (0-5, 0-1)
122. Massachusetts (0-5, 0-1)
123. Southern Mississippi (0-5, 0-1) – DOWN 5
124. New Mexico State (0-6, 0-0)
125. Georgia State (0-5, 0-0)

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nca...y/2936787/

(10-09-2013 04:18 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 04:12 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 02:33 PM)banker Wrote:  Thanks for showing your ignorance of what transpired.

I can't help it that we weren't motivated to play a crappy ECU team in the GMAC bowl just like you can't help it that when we did decide to impose our will your team was helpless.

Oh, and I like how you throw out years that don't suite you. Now you want to start at 2007 and forget the first two years of CUSA 2.0? You're a joke.

Since this is a college football rankings thread here goes:

2005 CUSA East
ECU 2nd
Marshall 6th

2006
ECU 2nd
Marshall 3rd


You know the rest of the years. The only year that Marshall ranked higher in CUSA East was 2011, when they had a 5-3 record to ECU's 4-4 record. Otherwise ECU has finished higher each year than Marshall.


http://espn.go.com/college-football/stan.../year/2011

What about all those MAC titles? Something like 5 in a row....Maybe they should go back the MAC, wait...err....Ohio?....nevermind.

Northern Illinois too.