(10-07-2013 07:42 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 11:38 AM)mac6115cd Wrote:  Gene Smith is the best snake oil saleman ever! Aside from O$U (and the jury's still out on them) the rest of the B1G isn't worth a warm bucket of urine - Iowa, Indiana, PSU, Illinois, Minnesota, MSU, Purdue, Maryland and Rutgers are jokes; Michigan, Wisconsin, Northwestern and Nebraska are just ok.

Aside from the SEC and PAC12, the rest of the conferences are only average. But I love the way he continues to act as though the B1G is the lead dog - I guess he's hoping if he says it enough, everyone will believe it.

Cincinatti isn't really that good. Most of those teams listed would beat you this year.

Bearcat hatred of the Big Ten makes me smile. Really, it does. For a Cincy fan to call all of those Universities a joke...it is just so god damned ignorant.

realize that you are talking about a team that has 10 or more wins 5 of the past 6 seasons

(10-08-2013 01:09 PM)Flying Bearcat Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 07:42 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 11:38 AM)mac6115cd Wrote:  Gene Smith is the best snake oil saleman ever! Aside from O$U (and the jury's still out on them) the rest of the B1G isn't worth a warm bucket of urine - Iowa, Indiana, PSU, Illinois, Minnesota, MSU, Purdue, Maryland and Rutgers are jokes; Michigan, Wisconsin, Northwestern and Nebraska are just ok.

Aside from the SEC and PAC12, the rest of the conferences are only average. But I love the way he continues to act as though the B1G is the lead dog - I guess he's hoping if he says it enough, everyone will believe it.

Cincinatti isn't really that good. Most of those teams listed would beat you this year.

Bearcat hatred of the Big Ten makes me smile. Really, it does. For a Cincy fan to call all of those Universities a joke...it is just so god damned ignorant.

realize that you are talking about a team that has 10 or more wins 5 of the past 6 seasons

Still didn't get you into the ACC did it?

Hell, it hasn't even gotten you into the Big 12.

(10-08-2013 01:09 PM)Flying Bearcat Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 07:42 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 11:38 AM)mac6115cd Wrote:  Gene Smith is the best snake oil saleman ever! Aside from O$U (and the jury's still out on them) the rest of the B1G isn't worth a warm bucket of urine - Iowa, Indiana, PSU, Illinois, Minnesota, MSU, Purdue, Maryland and Rutgers are jokes; Michigan, Wisconsin, Northwestern and Nebraska are just ok.

Aside from the SEC and PAC12, the rest of the conferences are only average. But I love the way he continues to act as though the B1G is the lead dog - I guess he's hoping if he says it enough, everyone will believe it.

Cincinatti isn't really that good. Most of those teams listed would beat you this year.

Bearcat hatred of the Big Ten makes me smile. Really, it does. For a Cincy fan to call all of those Universities a joke...it is just so god damned ignorant.

realize that you are talking about a team that has 10 or more wins 5 of the past 6 seasons

Did you really lose to USF?

That's what I thought.

(10-09-2013 11:07 AM)westwolf Wrote:  

(10-08-2013 01:09 PM)Flying Bearcat Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 07:42 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 11:38 AM)mac6115cd Wrote:  Gene Smith is the best snake oil saleman ever! Aside from O$U (and the jury's still out on them) the rest of the B1G isn't worth a warm bucket of urine - Iowa, Indiana, PSU, Illinois, Minnesota, MSU, Purdue, Maryland and Rutgers are jokes; Michigan, Wisconsin, Northwestern and Nebraska are just ok.

Aside from the SEC and PAC12, the rest of the conferences are only average. But I love the way he continues to act as though the B1G is the lead dog - I guess he's hoping if he says it enough, everyone will believe it.

Cincinatti isn't really that good. Most of those teams listed would beat you this year.

Bearcat hatred of the Big Ten makes me smile. Really, it does. For a Cincy fan to call all of those Universities a joke...it is just so god damned ignorant.

realize that you are talking about a team that has 10 or more wins 5 of the past 6 seasons

Did you really lose to USF?

Nice job with the ever weak Red Herring ploy here...

Regardless of who we just lost to and how we end the season the fact stands, UC has won 10 game or more five of the last six seasons and is one of the winningest programs in the nation over that time period. Losing to USF or anybody else this year or any year moving forward will never change that fact.

(10-09-2013 07:24 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  That's what I thought.

Big Ten bowl record since 2005: 16-28
Big Ten bowl record BCS Era: 41-48


That's what I thought.

You guys are the MAC in larger stadiums at this point and it's laughable. The even bigger laugh is everybody in the nation knows it but you. I read a book when I was a boy that contained this very theme...it was a children's book called The Emperor Has No Clothes.

Welcome to the truth...

(10-10-2013 08:26 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 07:24 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  That's what I thought.

Big Ten bowl record since 2005: 16-28
Big Ten bowl record BCS Era: 41-48


That's what I thought.

You guys are the MAC in larger stadiums at this point and it's laughable. The even bigger laugh is everybody in the nation knows it but you. I read a book when I was a boy that contained this very theme...it was a children's book called The Emperor Has No Clothes.

Welcome to the truth...

The truth is that the Big Ten plays in bigger and better bowls. Everyone knows what in the nation that we don't know? That our football programs are not up to snuff right now? We know it too but we also know something else. Your school would join the Big Ten in a heartbeat.

Welcome to the truth...

Have fun with your 40k stadium that will never get you into a top conference.

Just a little more truth for you...

I like where he drew the line considering that the Big10 is the 5the best conference in the land.

(10-10-2013 07:39 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 08:26 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 07:24 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  That's what I thought.

Big Ten bowl record since 2005: 16-28
Big Ten bowl record BCS Era: 41-48


That's what I thought.

You guys are the MAC in larger stadiums at this point and it's laughable. The even bigger laugh is everybody in the nation knows it but you. I read a book when I was a boy that contained this very theme...it was a children's book called The Emperor Has No Clothes.

Welcome to the truth...

The truth is that the Big Ten plays in bigger and better bowls. Everyone knows what in the nation that we don't know? That our football programs are not up to snuff right now? We know it too but we also know something else. Your school would join the Big Ten in a heartbeat.

Welcome to the truth...

Have fun with your 40k stadium that will never get you into a top conference.
Just a little more truth for you...

Are you an insider?

(10-10-2013 07:49 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I like where he drew the line considering that the Big10 is the 5the best conference in the land.

Yeah, guess that means that the Big Ten won't get in! You are a genius!

(10-10-2013 07:53 PM)Flying Bearcat Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 07:39 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 08:26 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 07:24 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  That's what I thought.

Big Ten bowl record since 2005: 16-28
Big Ten bowl record BCS Era: 41-48


That's what I thought.

You guys are the MAC in larger stadiums at this point and it's laughable. The even bigger laugh is everybody in the nation knows it but you. I read a book when I was a boy that contained this very theme...it was a children's book called The Emperor Has No Clothes.

Welcome to the truth...

The truth is that the Big Ten plays in bigger and better bowls. Everyone knows what in the nation that we don't know? That our football programs are not up to snuff right now? We know it too but we also know something else. Your school would join the Big Ten in a heartbeat.

Welcome to the truth...

Have fun with your 40k stadium that will never get you into a top conference.
Just a little more truth for you...

Are you an insider?

Oh wow, keep on believing!

(10-10-2013 07:53 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 07:49 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I like where he drew the line considering that the Big10 is the 5the best conference in the land.

Yeah, guess that means that the Big Ten won't get in! You are a genius!

What are you even getting at?

The Big10, on the field, has been poor recently. Why not include the AAC and make it 6?

I guess the Big10 needs somebody it can make itself feel better against by excluding. On the field it's rather embarrassing.

(10-10-2013 07:57 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 07:53 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 07:49 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I like where he drew the line considering that the Big10 is the 5the best conference in the land.

Yeah, guess that means that the Big Ten won't get in! You are a genius!

What are you even getting at?

The Big10, on the field, has been poor recently. Why not include the AAC and make it 6?

I guess the Big10 needs somebody it can make itself feel better against by excluding. On the field it's rather embarrassing.

So now you are going to make up some more BS and act like you know wtf you are talking about?

No one is excluding any major conference that has MAJOR contracts with MAJOR Networks. That is what makes a conference MAJOR. They are MAJOR because everyone else wants to be in one.

The AAC is not Major, they are mid major and they very likely WILL get in as a sort of Gatekeeper conference in order to maintain the visage of fairness.

If you knew anything at all about my opinion on what is likely to happen, then you would already know this. You are one of those persons that likes to make assumptions about others and then pass off that assumption as reality.

Myself on the other hand, I ASKED you for some more substantiation of your opinion. Instead of doing that you just pulled more BS out of your ass and tried to pass it off as my opinion.

Care to try again?

(10-10-2013 08:00 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 07:57 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 07:53 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 07:49 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I like where he drew the line considering that the Big10 is the 5the best conference in the land.

Yeah, guess that means that the Big Ten won't get in! You are a genius!

What are you even getting at?

The Big10, on the field, has been poor recently. Why not include the AAC and make it 6?

I guess the Big10 needs somebody it can make itself feel better against by excluding. On the field it's rather embarrassing.

So now you are going to make up some more BS and act like you know wtf you are talking about?

No one is excluding any major conference that has MAJOR contracts with MAJOR Networks. That is what makes a conference MAJOR. They are MAJOR because everyone else wants to be in one.

The AAC is not Major, they are mid major and they very likely WILL get in as a sort of Gatekeeper conference in order to maintain the visage of fairness.

If you knew anything at all about my opinion on what is likely to happen, then you would already know this. You are one of those persons that likes to make assumptions about others and then pass off that assumption as reality.

Myself on the other hand, I ASKED you for some more substantiation of your opinion. Instead of doing that you just pulled more BS out of your ass and tried to pass it off as my opinion.

Care to try again?

Defensive much? I can't help it the Rust Belt Conference is sliding.

I think all the proof you need can be found by looking at the Big10's performance over the last few years.

Okay. This thread has degenerated long enough. It's time for a new line of discussion to begin somewhere else...

(10-10-2013 08:12 PM)bitcruncher Wrote:  Okay. This thread has degenerated long enough. It's time for a new line of discussion to begin somewhere else...

Bit, I only opened this thread again to get your attention. The PM feature is fouled. I tried to PM these guys to stop this before it got out of hand and got the yellow warning box saying their PM features had been disabled. Since the PM box was still under their post I knew this wasn't true. I tried to PM you and got the same thing.

(10-10-2013 08:18 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-10-2013 08:12 PM)bitcruncher Wrote:  Okay. This thread has degenerated long enough. It's time for a new line of discussion to begin somewhere else...

Bit, I only opened this thread again to get your attention. The PM feature is fouled. I tried to PM these guys to stop this before it got out of hand and got the yellow warning box saying their PM features had been disabled. Since the PM box was still under their post I knew this wasn't true. I tried to PM you and got the same thing.

So I noticed. I think we'll need to contact GTS or another Admin to figure out what the problem is here...

I'm going to close this again. Like I said, this thread has degenerated long enough...