(10-02-2013 07:51 AM)Usajags Wrote: The federal government is run by idiots that don't understand simple economics. It is our own fault for electing these fools.
I suspect a lot of them know economics but choose to ignore economics. Remember "West Wing" and "Parks and Rec" are the only places where people speaking the truth to the public can win elections and Leslie is under recall petition.
I can tell you from bitter experience that most gov't agencies have two issues. #1. Do the job you are mandated to do. #2. Try to do it better than mandated.
I've watched "good government" people come in and amp up the capacity to do #1 (hire more clerks, cut processing time, shorten waits) but those good government people won't allocate resources to #2. Making sure that errors get caught, spot checking the validity of claims and compliance. Yet I've seen agency directors take a broad reading of some their appropriations and move some (not enough) resources to doing just those things. Then the next "good government" crowd comes in and wants to eliminate "waste, fraud, and abuse" and they cut the appropriation. The agency head knows his boss will be mad if wait times etc go up too much so they transfer the few compliance people they have to replace the front-line positions lost.
By cutting funds the chances of catching errors, waste, fraud and abuse decrease.
I've watched it at the city level, the county level, the state level and Federal level. It's the same story over and over.
It's not really even about this party or that party. It's just an ugly cycle and the cycle is driven by voters who rage about long waits and long processing times and when it becomes politically popular it gets addressed and when the budget is increased to resolve it the public is mad that it costs too much. The public likes the sound of stopping waste, fraud, and abuse but they don't like being involved in a spot check investigation to see if they are part of the waste, fraud, and abuse so they don't really want to pay for the investigators required even though the money spent on them can end up saving more money than a budget cut.
If the public wanted common sense they'd vote for it.