(09-23-2013 09:47 AM)bridgeforthduke Wrote:  The rule is that a player is suspended for a full game. So if the player is ejected in the first quarter, he will be eligible to play again in the second quarter of the next game.

I believe either the CAA or JMU can ask a panel to review to play in order to see if it did warrant an ejection. If it is found that it did not warrant an ejection, they can make Stanton available immediately for the Delaware game.

Schickman said after the game that Stanton would be suspended for the following game. Being that Mike's first call or instinct is so frequently wrong, I'm betting Stanton plays.

(09-23-2013 10:47 AM)olddawg Wrote:  

(09-23-2013 09:47 AM)bridgeforthduke Wrote:  The rule is that a player is suspended for a full game. So if the player is ejected in the first quarter, he will be eligible to play again in the second quarter of the next game.

I believe either the CAA or JMU can ask a panel to review to play in order to see if it did warrant an ejection. If it is found that it did not warrant an ejection, they can make Stanton available immediately for the Delaware game.

Schickman said after the game that Stanton would be suspended for the following game. Being that Mike's first call or instinct is so frequently wrong, I'm betting Stanton plays.

According to Stoss' tweet, Mickey on the conference call said that Stanton won't miss any playing time against Delaware.

Dukes 42 - Delaware 35

I'm not guaranteeing a win, but I am not afraid of a team that lost 51-7 to Navy. We get our act together on turnovers and get a pick 6 when they go after our young corners one too many times....JMU 34- Chickens 20.

(09-23-2013 09:47 AM)bridgeforthduke Wrote:  The rule is that a player is suspended for a full game. So if the player is ejected in the first quarter, he will be eligible to play again in the second quarter of the next game.

I believe either the CAA or JMU can ask a panel to review to play in order to see if it did warrant an ejection. If it is found that it did not warrant an ejection, they can make Stanton available immediately for the Delaware game.

This is not quite correct.

"The rule in football means that discipline for players flagged for violations will mirror the penalty for fighting. If the foul occurs in the first half of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game. If the foul occurs in the second half or overtime of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game and the first half of the next contest."
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/publ...nto+effect

The only good thing about the penalty is that it happened with less than a minute left in the first half, so he does not miss any of this weeks game.

(09-23-2013 11:43 AM)JMUDukes20 Wrote:  

(09-23-2013 09:47 AM)bridgeforthduke Wrote:  The rule is that a player is suspended for a full game. So if the player is ejected in the first quarter, he will be eligible to play again in the second quarter of the next game.

I believe either the CAA or JMU can ask a panel to review to play in order to see if it did warrant an ejection. If it is found that it did not warrant an ejection, they can make Stanton available immediately for the Delaware game.

This is not quite correct.

"The rule in football means that discipline for players flagged for violations will mirror the penalty for fighting. If the foul occurs in the first half of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game. If the foul occurs in the second half or overtime of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game and the first half of the next contest."
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/publ...nto+effect

The only good thing about the penalty is that it happened with less than a minute left in the first half, so he does not miss any of this weeks game.

Also it can't be overturned at the FCS level, only FBS.

(09-23-2013 09:14 AM)Dukie95 Wrote:  

(09-23-2013 09:12 AM)All Dukes_All Day Wrote:  

(09-23-2013 08:44 AM)Dukie95 Wrote:  

(09-23-2013 08:36 AM)DBJMU2006 Wrote:  Not having Harold and Stanton is a big loss, but I think we can do enough. This Delaware team isn't as good as people think, probably middle of the CAA.

Dukes 31
Hens 24

Are you automatically suspended the next game following an ejection?

It must've happened when Madizone was out for a bit, but what did Stanton do?

He was called for a 15 yard penalty following a hit on the QB...I didn't hear what the ref said, but it wasn't roughing the passer - I didn't recognize the hand signal. I didn't know he was ejected until this morning.

Our crowd booed and complained when it happened, but it was a legit call. It was right in front of 109 and I watched Stanton get past his guy and get to the QB (was hoping for a sack, but he got the ball off). Don't think it was intentional, but it was definite helmet-to-helmet against the QB. His helmet hit first and it was above the shoulders, with the new targeting rule it's an automatic call for the refs.

Dukes 38
Old people 14

Snarling Beasts 98
Sqwawking Chickens 2

(09-23-2013 11:43 AM)JMUDukes20 Wrote:  

(09-23-2013 09:47 AM)bridgeforthduke Wrote:  The rule is that a player is suspended for a full game. So if the player is ejected in the first quarter, he will be eligible to play again in the second quarter of the next game.

I believe either the CAA or JMU can ask a panel to review to play in order to see if it did warrant an ejection. If it is found that it did not warrant an ejection, they can make Stanton available immediately for the Delaware game.

This is not quite correct.

"The rule in football means that discipline for players flagged for violations will mirror the penalty for fighting. If the foul occurs in the first half of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game. If the foul occurs in the second half or overtime of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game and the first half of the next contest."
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/publ...nto+effect

The only good thing about the penalty is that it happened with less than a minute left in the first half, so he does not miss any of this weeks game.

Thanks. The article I referenced for that info must have known the second half rule and applied it to the first half as well.

Quote:Also it can't be overturned at the FCS level, only FBS.

It can be overturned in FCS, D2 and D3. It cannot be overturned during the game with a video review like in FBS, but instead the other divisions can ask for a panel to review the play to see if the ejection/suspension can be overturned.

Dukes find a way, 27-24

Most of this thread has turned into a is Stanton eligible thread because of Schikman putting out false info over the air at the game.

With good weather and a more healed Birdsong, JMU puts the run and pass together and the defense does well enough.

JMU: 30
Choked Chickens: 21

Both teams have won against sub-par competition. NAVY made UD their *****...

I expect a lot more read option of Big Red is healthy.

Dukes 28
UD 24

UD 27
JMU 26

Turnovers bite us as we turn the ball over in the last few mins and give UD a last second FG.

I'm curious, what about Delaware in the last three seasons leaves you guys to think that they're any good?

You're going to pick the Hens over YOUR Dukes because of a few turnovers the past few weeks? Some of ya'll need rootin lessons.

I'll refrain from posting any predictions, other than to say I expect it to be a close game, likely coming down to the finer points of execution, field position, and turnovers. My heart says chickens, but my head just doesn't know due to lack of sufficient info on what the new staff has planned. The game is absolutely pivotal for both squads.

To the prior poster's point, I'm not sure how one could look at the prior 3 years of football played by the Hens under Keeler, and feel that those were somehow relevant to the new systems being played by the Blue Hens now.

The offense seems a very significant improvement, but the defense is very much a question mark for me at the moment. Navy was a very bad loss for us, but that game is also one I'm not inclined to put much credence in because of Navy's style of play and how things can snowball against a system like that. The other 3 wins were softballs where we looked dynamic at points, but sloppy at others. Major measuring stick on Saturday.

(09-24-2013 10:56 AM)hens05alum Wrote:  I'll refrain from posting any predictions, other than to say I expect it to be a close game, likely coming down to the finer points of execution, field position, and turnovers. My heart says chickens, but my head just doesn't know due to lack of sufficient info on what the new staff has planned. The game is absolutely pivotal for both squads.

To the prior poster's point, I'm not sure how one could look at the prior 3 years of football played by the Hens under Keeler, and feel that those were somehow relevant to the new systems being played by the Blue Hens now.

The offense seems a very significant improvement, but the defense is very much a question mark for me at the moment. Navy was a very bad loss for us, but that game is also one I'm not inclined to put much credence in because of Navy's style of play and how things can snowball against a system like that. The other 3 wins were softballs where we looked dynamic at points, but sloppy at others. Major measuring stick on Saturday.

I'm mostly trying to get Dukes fans to stop being so pessimistic about our team. In year's past it was unthinkable that we'd have half our posters predicting a Hens win despite the Dukes being 3-1.

Exactly. Root fer Dukes!

(09-24-2013 11:12 AM)All Dukes_All Day Wrote:  I'm mostly trying to get Dukes fans to stop being so pessimistic about our team. In year's past it was unthinkable that we'd have half our posters predicting a Hens win despite the Dukes being 3-1.

So, we're all supposed to be homers?

I don't really know how good UD is, or how good we are. What I do know is that UD is better than SFU, CCSU and Charlotte. Even without knowing much about UD, I can safely say that if we play like we did against those teams we're going to struggle...playing in UD is never easy.

The number of turnovers we've had is actually concerning, and not something that can be shrugged off...especially when they're coming from "unbenchables" like Scott and Birdsong.

No one on this team has ever played at UD... The only experience our players have in a loud stadium is ODU two years ago. Our seniors have played exactly one game in an environment that large and loud.