Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
All-Time C-USA football standings
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
ecumbh1999 Offline
Keeper of the Code
*

Posts: 11,888
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 255
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #61
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 07:43 AM)SVHerd Wrote:  Thats why I respect USM and feel they are the top program in CUSA history. I know the ECU posters will disagree. LOL!
Good job Eagles!

Was going to say don't feed the troll, but too late.
08-14-2013 05:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ecumbh1999 Offline
Keeper of the Code
*

Posts: 11,888
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 255
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #62
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 03:15 PM)WinOrLoseEAGLE Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 03:01 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 02:53 PM)gdunn Wrote:  You keep talking about a low ceiling for USM, you have some hate for us that's for sure.

What would you call it?

The guy said you had the 33rd all time best winning percentage. Obviously you’ve won a lot over the years but you don’t have much in the way of foundational things to show for it which has to scare conferences off. UTSA hasn't even played a full D1a schedule and are drawing more than you ever have. Starting from ground zero with rookie AD's and Coaches and everyone that had anything ever to do with all that past success no longer there doesn't help either.

Let's see..."accomplishing more with less" sounds about right. How about "best bang for the buck". My personal favorite, though, is "let 'em talk; we own their ass."

It's not them, it's one or two, not the whole. Please, for the love of God, stop lumping us all together, like it's every single ECU fan here.
08-14-2013 05:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chappy Online
Resident Goonie
*

Posts: 18,896
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 899
I Root For: ECU
Location: Raleigh, NC
Post: #63
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
After all these years, he's stilljonesing.
08-14-2013 05:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ecumbh1999 Offline
Keeper of the Code
*

Posts: 11,888
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 255
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #64
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 02:20 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 01:57 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 01:49 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  Best part of this if your a Southern Miss fan is that we have the most wins in C-USA history and are 33rd all time in win percentage but with how college athletics are today we could have had the least amount of wins in C-USA, been 145th all time winning percentage but been in a big city and we would have been in another conference by now. It was all for not, fans don't care about wins anymore, they don't come to games to see their favorite team win, they come for the markets and the academic like minded institutions. That is what college athletics is all about. We spent all this time winning games when we should have been moving our university to Jackson or New Orleans.

Or you could actually grow your fanbase and budget.

It is kind of hard to grow a fanbase with Baton Rouge and Tuscaloosa just a few hours away. Most of our fanbase chooses to be "walmart SEC fans" over where they went to school or where they live. It is something we deal with on a daily basis. ECU, yes you compete with North Carolina and so on but we can both agree that is nowhere near the level of Alabama, LSU, and the SEC. It is a whole different world down here with that. Despite all those setbacks including our lack of market(which people love to throw in our face) or our lack of academics(that USM degree didnt seem to phase our governor, Chuck Schiana a mulit millionaire businessman or several military commanders including Jeff Hammond and Walter Yates). We simply win, we win football games. One season will never define who we are whether it is 12-2 or 0-12. I would rather have the respect of the college football world then sit here and be lectured by teams we have dominated over the years about what is wrong with our program and what it takes to get into a conference we were already in for 15 years. All these fans of schools that have left and go over to the AAC and talk about how they are so glad to have shed the excess baggage that was holding them back, just remember one thing, we are proven winners on the field and all the money or markets in the world will not change that. That is all our fans care about, so you can have your AAC(which is the exact same conference we were in last year plus Temple, Cinci, and Uconn, your not fooling anybody) and you can have your markets and all that other stuff, I will take winning all day everyday. Rant over.

Let me stop you right here. First, it not all the fans. Second, sorry Tulane fans, I'd happily trade you out for USM, and not even think about it.

As far as ECU goes, we have UNC, NC State, Wake, Duke, all in the same state, that's 4 other FBS schools (yes Charlotte and Happy Appy fans, I know you are moving up, I'm talking the past 30 years). Then with in a few hours drive we VT, UVa., South Carolina, Clemson as well. No, we don't have many SEC schools to deal with, but we have a shate load of ACC and other teams surrounding us. You don't have the market cornered in adversity. And, we wouldn't be filling a 50,000 seat stadium without a history of winning.

ECU and USM have a long history together and faced many of the same hardships in growing our schools and athletic programs. I have a ton of respect for USM. But, jeez lighten up Sally.
08-14-2013 05:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Billy Free Offline
Banned

Posts: 414
Joined: Jun 2010
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #65
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 05:43 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 02:20 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 01:57 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 01:49 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  Best part of this if your a Southern Miss fan is that we have the most wins in C-USA history and are 33rd all time in win percentage but with how college athletics are today we could have had the least amount of wins in C-USA, been 145th all time winning percentage but been in a big city and we would have been in another conference by now. It was all for not, fans don't care about wins anymore, they don't come to games to see their favorite team win, they come for the markets and the academic like minded institutions. That is what college athletics is all about. We spent all this time winning games when we should have been moving our university to Jackson or New Orleans.

Or you could actually grow your fanbase and budget.

It is kind of hard to grow a fanbase with Baton Rouge and Tuscaloosa just a few hours away. Most of our fanbase chooses to be "walmart SEC fans" over where they went to school or where they live. It is something we deal with on a daily basis. ECU, yes you compete with North Carolina and so on but we can both agree that is nowhere near the level of Alabama, LSU, and the SEC. It is a whole different world down here with that. Despite all those setbacks including our lack of market(which people love to throw in our face) or our lack of academics(that USM degree didnt seem to phase our governor, Chuck Schiana a mulit millionaire businessman or several military commanders including Jeff Hammond and Walter Yates). We simply win, we win football games. One season will never define who we are whether it is 12-2 or 0-12. I would rather have the respect of the college football world then sit here and be lectured by teams we have dominated over the years about what is wrong with our program and what it takes to get into a conference we were already in for 15 years. All these fans of schools that have left and go over to the AAC and talk about how they are so glad to have shed the excess baggage that was holding them back, just remember one thing, we are proven winners on the field and all the money or markets in the world will not change that. That is all our fans care about, so you can have your AAC(which is the exact same conference we were in last year plus Temple, Cinci, and Uconn, your not fooling anybody) and you can have your markets and all that other stuff, I will take winning all day everyday. Rant over.

Let me stop you right here. First, it not all the fans. Second, sorry Tulane fans, I'd happily trade you out for USM, and not even think about it.

As far as ECU goes, we have UNC, NC State, Wake, Duke, all in the same state, that's 4 other FBS schools (yes Charlotte and Happy Appy fans, I know you are moving up, I'm talking the past 30 years). Then with in a few hours drive we VT, UVa., South Carolina, Clemson as well. No, we don't have many SEC schools to deal with, but we have a shate load of ACC and other teams surrounding us. You don't have the market cornered in adversity. And, we wouldn't be filling a 50,000 seat stadium without a history of winning.

ECU and USM have a long history together and faced many of the same hardships in growing our schools and athletic programs. I have a ton of respect for USM. But, jeez lighten up Sally.

Your right, I didn't think it was possible for someone to get under my skin but jonesing accomplished that. ECU And USM have a good history together and hopefully that will continue one day.
08-14-2013 06:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,590
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1039
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #66
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 11:19 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Given that UAB fell off a cliff in 2005, I'm surprised we're that high. Some oldsters have been around long enough to remember when we were consistently a pretty tough out.
I remember thinking when UAB joined for football that they would become one of the 2-3 most dominant programs in the conference. And there actually were some early indications that it might happen. It still baffles me that it hasn't, but I admit that 15 years ago, I was honestly unaware of how vicious and anti-UAB the UAT gang was. I don't think there is any other FBS-level program in the United States that is so actively and aggressively undermined by in-state political forces as is UAB.
08-14-2013 07:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TG4 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,564
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 841
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: Franklin, TN
Post: #67
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
I'm still waiting for Memphis to get a Liberty Bowl invite after almost 50 years.
08-14-2013 07:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Freshy Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,033
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 42
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #68
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 06:32 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 05:43 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 02:20 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 01:57 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 01:49 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  Best part of this if your a Southern Miss fan is that we have the most wins in C-USA history and are 33rd all time in win percentage but with how college athletics are today we could have had the least amount of wins in C-USA, been 145th all time winning percentage but been in a big city and we would have been in another conference by now. It was all for not, fans don't care about wins anymore, they don't come to games to see their favorite team win, they come for the markets and the academic like minded institutions. That is what college athletics is all about. We spent all this time winning games when we should have been moving our university to Jackson or New Orleans.

Or you could actually grow your fanbase and budget.

It is kind of hard to grow a fanbase with Baton Rouge and Tuscaloosa just a few hours away. Most of our fanbase chooses to be "walmart SEC fans" over where they went to school or where they live. It is something we deal with on a daily basis. ECU, yes you compete with North Carolina and so on but we can both agree that is nowhere near the level of Alabama, LSU, and the SEC. It is a whole different world down here with that. Despite all those setbacks including our lack of market(which people love to throw in our face) or our lack of academics(that USM degree didnt seem to phase our governor, Chuck Schiana a mulit millionaire businessman or several military commanders including Jeff Hammond and Walter Yates). We simply win, we win football games. One season will never define who we are whether it is 12-2 or 0-12. I would rather have the respect of the college football world then sit here and be lectured by teams we have dominated over the years about what is wrong with our program and what it takes to get into a conference we were already in for 15 years. All these fans of schools that have left and go over to the AAC and talk about how they are so glad to have shed the excess baggage that was holding them back, just remember one thing, we are proven winners on the field and all the money or markets in the world will not change that. That is all our fans care about, so you can have your AAC(which is the exact same conference we were in last year plus Temple, Cinci, and Uconn, your not fooling anybody) and you can have your markets and all that other stuff, I will take winning all day everyday. Rant over.

Let me stop you right here. First, it not all the fans. Second, sorry Tulane fans, I'd happily trade you out for USM, and not even think about it.

As far as ECU goes, we have UNC, NC State, Wake, Duke, all in the same state, that's 4 other FBS schools (yes Charlotte and Happy Appy fans, I know you are moving up, I'm talking the past 30 years). Then with in a few hours drive we VT, UVa., South Carolina, Clemson as well. No, we don't have many SEC schools to deal with, but we have a shate load of ACC and other teams surrounding us. You don't have the market cornered in adversity. And, we wouldn't be filling a 50,000 seat stadium without a history of winning.

ECU and USM have a long history together and faced many of the same hardships in growing our schools and athletic programs. I have a ton of respect for USM. But, jeez lighten up Sally.

Your right, I didn't think it was possible for someone to get under my skin but jonesing accomplished that. ECU And USM have a good history together and hopefully that will continue one day.

Southern Miss has a total enrollment figure of 16,604, one third of whom actually attend class 85 miles away from the stadium, while ECU has an enrollment figure of something like 27,386. That translates into far more living alumni. You guys should have ~70% higher attendance on the basis of that number alone.

While Southern Miss enjoys legislative protection as one of Mississippi's Big Three universities, that status opens us up to political in-fighting. We are fighting a jealously protected health care program on one hand and a jealously protected engineering program on the other hand. Consequently, Southern Miss has neither the Medical School (and the expanded nursing and other health care programs that come with it) nor the Engineering Faculty (and the expanded mathematics and science programs that come with it) that ECU has. Consequently, we don't have the high-dollar donors that those types of professional programs tend to generate. You guys should have a higher athletic department budget than we do.

I'm not making excuses for us. We do have to do better if we want to compete. But to throw numbers and facts out there in a method that conveys disdain without listing the circumstances behind those numbers and facts is being deliberately deceptive.
08-14-2013 07:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JDTulane Offline
Sazeracs and Retirement
*

Posts: 11,787
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 424
I Root For: Peace
Location:
Post: #69
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
Don't worry ECU fan. We'd rather have USM on board than you too :) 04-cheers
08-14-2013 08:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 30,335
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2450
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment

Survivor Champion
Post: #70
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
It's nice to know we have dates for the dance, but we've been grounded.
08-14-2013 08:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WinOrLoseEAGLE Offline
Banned

Posts: 820
Joined: Nov 2003
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #71
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 05:28 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 03:15 PM)WinOrLoseEAGLE Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 03:01 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 02:53 PM)gdunn Wrote:  You keep talking about a low ceiling for USM, you have some hate for us that's for sure.

What would you call it?

The guy said you had the 33rd all time best winning percentage. Obviously you’ve won a lot over the years but you don’t have much in the way of foundational things to show for it which has to scare conferences off. UTSA hasn't even played a full D1a schedule and are drawing more than you ever have. Starting from ground zero with rookie AD's and Coaches and everyone that had anything ever to do with all that past success no longer there doesn't help either.

Let's see..."accomplishing more with less" sounds about right. How about "best bang for the buck". My personal favorite, though, is "let 'em talk; we own their ass."

It's not them, it's one or two, not the whole. Please, for the love of God, stop lumping us all together, like it's every single ECU fan here.

Correct - it's only a few......should have worded it a bit better.
08-14-2013 09:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TTT Offline
#SMTTT
*

Posts: 5,324
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 226
I Root For: USM & G5
Location: The Burg
Post: #72
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
A few things that need to be noted in this thread:

1. The early C-USA league (96-'04) was a much tougher league and had BETTER teams than after '04......in other words...winning C-USA before '04 means a HELLUVA lot more than winning C-USA after '04. Hell, seems like every year we had multiple teams finish in the top 20...not to mention we (C-USA) were consistently beating OTHER ranked teams.

2. People say "hey USM you've won so much...why can't you grow your fan-base?". It's because we are surrounded by LSU, Alabama, Mississippi State, Ole Miss, Tenn, Auburn, and Florida State......NOT Duke, Wake Forest, UNC, Nc State (ZERO national championships between those schools). Since the early 90's LSU/Ala/MSU/OM/Tenn/Auburn/FSU have accounted for FIFTEEN APPEARANCES IN THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!!).........Duke, Wake Forest, UNC, Nc State, USC, Clemson have accounted for ZERO appearances in the national championships! I repeat, ZERO APPEARANCES!!! NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY ECU has grown their fan-base....and USM HASN'T.

3. For some odd reason....people are shocked that a brand new fb program like UTSA can outdraw a school with so much more history...it's called having 3 million people (San Antonio)....not 145,000 people (Hattiesburg).
08-14-2013 09:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
blunderbuss Offline
Banned

Posts: 19,649
Joined: Apr 2011
I Root For: ECU & the CSA
Location: Buzz City, NC
Post: #73
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
SJ, you're a real piece of **** for calling out a school that's dominated us over the years.

USM fans, it really, really irks me how badly you own us on the field. Maybe that's why SJ feels the need to talk so much trash to you guys.
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2013 09:52 PM by blunderbuss.)
08-14-2013 09:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ecumbh1999 Offline
Keeper of the Code
*

Posts: 11,888
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 255
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #74
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 07:44 PM)Freshy Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 06:32 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 05:43 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 02:20 PM)Billy Free Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 01:57 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  Or you could actually grow your fanbase and budget.

It is kind of hard to grow a fanbase with Baton Rouge and Tuscaloosa just a few hours away. Most of our fanbase chooses to be "walmart SEC fans" over where they went to school or where they live. It is something we deal with on a daily basis. ECU, yes you compete with North Carolina and so on but we can both agree that is nowhere near the level of Alabama, LSU, and the SEC. It is a whole different world down here with that. Despite all those setbacks including our lack of market(which people love to throw in our face) or our lack of academics(that USM degree didnt seem to phase our governor, Chuck Schiana a mulit millionaire businessman or several military commanders including Jeff Hammond and Walter Yates). We simply win, we win football games. One season will never define who we are whether it is 12-2 or 0-12. I would rather have the respect of the college football world then sit here and be lectured by teams we have dominated over the years about what is wrong with our program and what it takes to get into a conference we were already in for 15 years. All these fans of schools that have left and go over to the AAC and talk about how they are so glad to have shed the excess baggage that was holding them back, just remember one thing, we are proven winners on the field and all the money or markets in the world will not change that. That is all our fans care about, so you can have your AAC(which is the exact same conference we were in last year plus Temple, Cinci, and Uconn, your not fooling anybody) and you can have your markets and all that other stuff, I will take winning all day everyday. Rant over.

Let me stop you right here. First, it not all the fans. Second, sorry Tulane fans, I'd happily trade you out for USM, and not even think about it.

As far as ECU goes, we have UNC, NC State, Wake, Duke, all in the same state, that's 4 other FBS schools (yes Charlotte and Happy Appy fans, I know you are moving up, I'm talking the past 30 years). Then with in a few hours drive we VT, UVa., South Carolina, Clemson as well. No, we don't have many SEC schools to deal with, but we have a shate load of ACC and other teams surrounding us. You don't have the market cornered in adversity. And, we wouldn't be filling a 50,000 seat stadium without a history of winning.

ECU and USM have a long history together and faced many of the same hardships in growing our schools and athletic programs. I have a ton of respect for USM. But, jeez lighten up Sally.

Your right, I didn't think it was possible for someone to get under my skin but jonesing accomplished that. ECU And USM have a good history together and hopefully that will continue one day.

Southern Miss has a total enrollment figure of 16,604, one third of whom actually attend class 85 miles away from the stadium, while ECU has an enrollment figure of something like 27,386. That translates into far more living alumni. You guys should have ~70% higher attendance on the basis of that number alone.

While Southern Miss enjoys legislative protection as one of Mississippi's Big Three universities, that status opens us up to political in-fighting. We are fighting a jealously protected health care program on one hand and a jealously protected engineering program on the other hand. Consequently, Southern Miss has neither the Medical School (and the expanded nursing and other health care programs that come with it) nor the Engineering Faculty (and the expanded mathematics and science programs that come with it) that ECU has. Consequently, we don't have the high-dollar donors that those types of professional programs tend to generate. You guys should have a higher athletic department budget than we do.

I'm not making excuses for us. We do have to do better if we want to compete. But to throw numbers and facts out there in a method that conveys disdain without listing the circumstances behind those numbers and facts is being deliberately deceptive.

Hey, at least some legislative protection, we have none. Every bit of growth, new programs has been hard fought, and still is. And, we have to fight for continued funding of the programs we have at decent levels. Charlotte fans know of what I speak. God forbid we EVER even think about asking to start of law school. Heads would explode in Chapel Hill and Raleigh.
08-14-2013 09:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RUNVSFD MINER Offline
The voice in your head...See?
*

Posts: 7,608
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 451
I Root For: UTEP
Location:
Post: #75
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 07:22 PM)TG4 Wrote:  I'm still waiting for Memphis to get a Liberty Bowl invite after almost 50 years.

What does Memphis have to do with anything in this thread?
08-14-2013 09:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
southernmiss4ever Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,688
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 26
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #76
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 09:41 PM)TTT Wrote:  3. For some odd reason....people are shocked that a brand new fb program like UTSA can outdraw a school with so much more history...it's called having 3 million people (San Antonio)....not 145,000 people (Hattiesburg).

USM doesn't have 145k people. Not even close.

The bigger problem for USM is young fans. There's not enough. I know way too many USM students who root for USM as their "second" team only after MSU/OM/LSU/BAMA/ et al.

Go to Mugshots or Buffalo Wild Wings in Hattiesburg on a Saturday afternoon/night in the fall, and I promise you'd think you were in Tuscaloosa or Baton Rouge.

I remember the first Mississippi State home game in 2011, we had a full restaurant (can hold about 300 people) and 2/3's of them had brought cowbells into the place for the game.....We're 3 hours and some change away from Starkville.

At the end of the day, USM has gained support and fans over the past two decades. Anyone that went to games in the late 90's when we had a few of our greatest teams of all time will tell you that the support now and atmosphere at the games are better than they were then. It's gotten to the point now where the only way you can get true exposure and gain national attention/support is to standout and win big and often. USM has always done well in conference, it's the out of conference games that have held USM back. A Sugar Bowl berth in 2011/2012 would have ultimately been the spark USM needed to really gain some momentum. It is what it is.
08-14-2013 10:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bambu Offline
Starving Artist
*

Posts: 3,197
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 97
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Soulsville,U.S.A.
Post: #77
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 07:22 PM)TG4 Wrote:  I'm still waiting for Memphis to get a Liberty Bowl invite after almost 50 years.

I'm waiting for someone to mention the hoops domination.03-lmfao
08-14-2013 10:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TG4 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,564
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 841
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: Franklin, TN
Post: #78
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
(08-14-2013 09:55 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(08-14-2013 07:22 PM)TG4 Wrote:  I'm still waiting for Memphis to get a Liberty Bowl invite after almost 50 years.

What does Memphis have to do with anything in this thread?

Oh, I don't know. Maybe because they were listed in the rankings and a C-USA member for 18 years?

Ranking teams simply by the total # of victories:

Southern Miss: 83-42 / 66.4% (1996-2012)
East Carolina: 72-48 / 60.0% (1997-2012)
Houston: 68-57 / 54.4% (1996-2012)
Memphis: 48-77 / 38.4% (1996-2012)
Tulsa: 47-17 / 73.4% (2005-2012)
UAB: 46-62 /42.6% (1999-2012)
UCF: 43-21 / 67.2% (2005-2012)
Louisville: 40-21 / 65.6% (1996-2004)
Tulane: 40-85 / 32.0% (1996-2012)
Marshall: 30-34 / 46.9% (2005-2012)
SMU: 30-34 / 46.9% (2005-2012)
Rice: 29-35 / 45.3% (2005-2012)
Cincinnati: 28-33 /45.9% (1996-2004)
UTEP: 24-40 / 37.5% (2005-2012)
TCU: 20-11 / 64.5% (2001-2004)
Army: 9-41 / 18.0% (1998-2004)
South Florida: 8-8 / 50.0% (2003-2004)
Kansas: 1-0 / 100% (2000) (UAB's 23-20 loss @KU in 2000 was counted as a "conference game" for purpose of standings)
08-15-2013 06:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DaSaintFan Offline
Dum' Sutherner in Midwest!
*

Posts: 15,868
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 408
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Stuck in St. Louis
Post: #79
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
Look at it this way.. I honestly dont' think anyone can be as putrid on the football field as Army was for their time here.

So everyone will always have the "we're better than Army" motto to work with.
08-15-2013 06:55 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
panicstricken Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,344
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 273
I Root For: Tulsa
Location: Folly Beach
Post: #80
RE: All-Time C-USA football standings
Im glad that Tulsa gets 9 more wins in 2013

We better get lots of OOC and Bowl games against CUSA so we can keep racking em up ; )
08-15-2013 06:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.