(07-07-2013 07:07 PM)Cougar Hippy Wrote: And I'm trying to not buy into the "Rice students/fans/alumns" aren't snooty, stuck-up rich kids with a nauseating sense of entitlement.
It would seem you have confused the Rice stereotype with the SMU stereotype.
SMU students/fans/alumns in general are far more likely to be in your words "snooty, stuck-up rich kids with a nauseating sense of entitlement."
The more accurate Rice stereotype would be 'weird, quirky intellectual kids who were often not the most popular growing up, not the most athletically interested or oriented to the exclusion of other life interests and hobbies, and pretty much middle-class in stature and life outlook, though many used their Rice degree to achieve a significant upward mobility while mostly retaining their level-headed and realistic life outlook.'
The average Rice student is, upon encountering, actually fairly non-threatening, ordinary and pedestrian, just more keenly intellectual and highly academically motivated.
My experience from reading many boards from large and small schools across the nation is that those alumns and fans who root for the Blue and Gray (ie, Rice- those are our colors, after all) and care to post on a public fan forum would appear to be somewhat more even-handed than the average college sports fan, and that seems to be putting it mildly.
To summarize, then:
Rice = geeky, pretty much
SMU = rich kids, pretty much
UH = hit or miss, as specified in the comments above and below this one on percentage of attendance vs actual student populations, respectively.