Would you rather your team be one of the top three teams in CUSA every year or one of the bottom five teams in the AAC every year?

Which of these scenarios would help a program the most over a ten year period, or would it make difference?

Yeah, this thread will go well.....................

(07-01-2013 12:02 AM)Kyle0614 Wrote:  

Sorry, I just like watching those dang carrots dance lol

I want to be in a conference with Texas teams.

I wouldn't mind us being the last place team in the SEC ....every year..............for a few years..........

I think we need to see how the AAC plays out. Being a brand new conference who knows what will happen.

Trick question, right?!?!?!? the aac is only going to have 5 teams?

I didn't even realize this was a two part question

So the real question is would you rather be Southern Miss/Rice or Memphis/Tulane.

(06-30-2013 11:37 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  Would you rather your team be one of the top three teams in CUSA every year or one of the bottom five teams in the AAC every year?

Which of these scenarios would help a program the most over a ten year period, or would it make difference?

Why would being at the bottom of any conference be a way to "help a program"??

(07-01-2013 07:20 AM)MU ATO Wrote:  

(06-30-2013 11:37 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  Would you rather your team be one of the top three teams in CUSA every year or one of the bottom five teams in the AAC every year?

Which of these scenarios would help a program the most over a ten year period, or would it make difference?

Why would being at the bottom of any conference be a way to "help a program"??

Kentucky makes more than Western Kentucky just being at the bottom of the SEC. There will not be that much of a difference b/t the AAC and CUSA though.

Could be the Sunbelt Champ

(07-01-2013 07:26 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(07-01-2013 07:20 AM)MU ATO Wrote:  

(06-30-2013 11:37 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  Would you rather your team be one of the top three teams in CUSA every year or one of the bottom five teams in the AAC every year?

Which of these scenarios would help a program the most over a ten year period, or would it make difference?

Why would being at the bottom of any conference be a way to "help a program"??

Kentucky makes more than Western Kentucky just being at the bottom of the SEC. There will not be that much of a difference b/t the AAC and CUSA though.

Yeah I'd gladly take being at the bottom of the ACC or SEC vs being in C-USA, but that's a massive difference in revenue. The revenue gap between the AAC and C-USA pretty insignificant in terms of the TV deal so if the choice was be in contention for the C-USA title every year or forever cellar dweller in the AAC I'd pick C-USA.

Who would I rather be from a selection of Rice, Southern Miss, Tulane, and Memphis?

I'll take Rice. To be honest, it's not even close in my opinion.

1. Rice
2A. Memphis
2B. Tulane
3. Southern Miss

Rice is a little brother to Tulane - but a smarter one.

(07-01-2013 08:05 AM)oliveandblue Wrote:  1. Rice
2A. Memphis
2B. Tulane
3. Southern Miss

Rice is a little brother to Tulane - but a smarter one.

From a stAte perspective, T1ger H1gh looks down on ASU. They think they are superior in every sport. We have dominated them in football, We have bigger crowds, win championships and go to bowl games. I wouldn't trade conferences with them if it meant sucking so much

I rather be at the top of whatever conference I'm in than at the bottom.

You think Kentucky or Duke football fans get to talk smack to any-damn-body?

(07-01-2013 08:49 AM)Smaug Wrote:  I rather be at the top of whatever conference I'm in than at the bottom.

You think Kentucky or Duke football fans get to talk smack to any-damn-body?

In basketball they do.

(07-01-2013 09:05 AM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(07-01-2013 08:49 AM)Smaug Wrote:  I rather be at the top of whatever conference I'm in than at the bottom.

You think Kentucky or Duke football fans get to talk smack to any-damn-body?

In basketball they do.

Duke football fans? Can not compute average, can not divide by zero.