Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
BCS vs Playoff access
Author Message
Shannon Panther Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,879
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 373
I Root For: Pitt
Location: Nashville, TN

Donators
Post: #1
BCS vs Playoff access
The more things change, the more they stay the same. In the beginning of the BCS era, the 6 autobid conferences plus ND totaled 63 schools. Of those 63 schools, only Temple is not in a conference whose champion gets.an automatic place in the playoffs. In addition there are 3.schools.who were conferences.that didn't receive an autobid. Louisville of the ACC, TCU of the Big 12, and Utah of the PAC 12.

For all of the machinations of realignment, there has been almost no change in the top group. Only Temple, who was expelled from the Big East failed to make in into the top tier.

The number of conferences has contracted from 6 to 5. But the number of teams has grown by 2. Assuming the next evolution is to consolidate into 4 conferences. At 16 members per conference plus ND you are still at 65.

It seems even if another conference is eliminated, they are just rearranging the furniture. This is good news for the existing top 5 and bad news for aspiring schools.like UConn and Cinci. Their best hope is to get into the B12 to get them to 12 members.
05-07-2013 11:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Chris02M Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,017
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 15
I Root For: syracuse
Location:
Post: #2
RE: BCS vs Playoff access
if they went to the 4 by 16 teams thing some big 12 teams or UConn/cincy/usf/ucf could be left out .
05-07-2013 01:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Shannon Panther Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,879
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 373
I Root For: Pitt
Location: Nashville, TN

Donators
Post: #3
Re: RE: BCS vs Playoff access
(05-07-2013 01:28 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  if they went to the 4 by 16 teams thing some big 12 teams or UConn/cincy/usf/ucf could be left out .

This is true. Iowa State shouls be very worried if that happens. The Texoma 4 would likely move to the PAC 12. WVU probably lands in the ACC or SEC. Kansas is probably B1G bound. The SEC might try to grab TCU for the Dallas - Ft Worth market. Then maybe take KSU. Baylor might get into the SEC instead of TCU. The question becomes does the ACC take WVU or go with a Cinci / UConn combo? If they take WVU do they take Cinci or UConn?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
05-07-2013 02:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,007
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 938
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #4
RE: BCS vs Playoff access
Nah, according to the "conventional wisdom" on the WVU Scout Realignment Board, the only thing that the ACC GOR did was "kick the can down the road."

By signing the GOR, the ACC schools allegedly acted against their own best financial interests and will only fall further behind the SEC, Pac 12 and Big Ten in revenues.

The only thing, according to this belief, that the ACC GOR actually did was also potentially doom the Big 12.

If the Big 12 can just hang on (because they will make more than the ACC but less than the others) until the ACC GOR expires, the Big 12 will then move to absorb the best 6 schools of the ACC.

Try to keep up, guys......
05-07-2013 02:29 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Shannon Panther Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,879
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 373
I Root For: Pitt
Location: Nashville, TN

Donators
Post: #5
Re: RE: BCS vs Playoff access
(05-07-2013 02:29 PM)TerryD Wrote:  Nah, according to the "conventional wisdom" on the WVU Scout Realignment Board, the only thing that the ACC GOR did was "kick the can down the road."

By signing the GOR, the ACC schools allegedly acted against their own best financial interests and will only fall further behind the SEC, Pac 12 and Big Ten in revenues.

The only thing, according to this belief, that the ACC GOR actually did was also potentially doom the Big 12.

If the Big 12 can just hang on (because they will make more than the ACC but less than the others) until the ACC GOR expires, the Big 12 will then move to absorb the best 6 schools of the ACC.

Try to keep up, guys......

All of which supports my observation that if there is further consolidation, it will still be mostly churn at the top and very little upward mobility.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
05-07-2013 04:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gocards#1 Offline
Banned

Posts: 485
Joined: Dec 2012
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #6
RE: BCS vs Playoff access
(05-07-2013 02:29 PM)TerryD Wrote:  Nah, according to the "conventional wisdom" on the WVU Scout Realignment Board, the only thing that the ACC GOR did was "kick the can down the road."

By signing the GOR, the ACC schools allegedly acted against their own best financial interests and will only fall further behind the SEC, Pac 12 and Big Ten in revenues.

The only thing, according to this belief, that the ACC GOR actually did was also potentially doom the Big 12.

If the Big 12 can just hang on (because they will make more than the ACC but less than the others) until the ACC GOR expires, the Big 12 will then move to absorb the best 6 schools of the ACC.

Try to keep up, guys......

I got banned from the conference realignment board for saying this.
05-07-2013 07:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
orangefan Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,223
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 358
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: New England
Post: #7
RE: BCS vs Playoff access
(05-07-2013 07:09 PM)gocards#1 Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 02:29 PM)TerryD Wrote:  Nah, according to the "conventional wisdom" on the WVU Scout Realignment Board, the only thing that the ACC GOR did was "kick the can down the road."

By signing the GOR, the ACC schools allegedly acted against their own best financial interests and will only fall further behind the SEC, Pac 12 and Big Ten in revenues.

The only thing, according to this belief, that the ACC GOR actually did was also potentially doom the Big 12.

If the Big 12 can just hang on (because they will make more than the ACC but less than the others) until the ACC GOR expires, the Big 12 will then move to absorb the best 6 schools of the ACC.

Try to keep up, guys......

I got banned from the conference realignment board for saying this.

TerryD is only repeating what's being said

One irrefutable rebuttal to this line of thinking is that the B12 GOR is going to run out two years, I believe, before the ACC's. This will give the B1G, SEC and P12 a chance to make a run at Texas, OU, OSU, KU and TTU before the ACC even comes back into play.

The success of the various conference networks is going to be key in all of this. If the ACC Network is a big success, the current TV deal and GOR are likely to be extended well in advance of the current expiry, at a significant increase in the profit share to conference members in exchange for the extension.
05-07-2013 07:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Maize Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,352
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 558
I Root For: Athletes First
Location:
Post: #8
RE: BCS vs Playoff access
(05-07-2013 07:36 PM)orangefan Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 07:09 PM)gocards#1 Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 02:29 PM)TerryD Wrote:  Nah, according to the "conventional wisdom" on the WVU Scout Realignment Board, the only thing that the ACC GOR did was "kick the can down the road."

By signing the GOR, the ACC schools allegedly acted against their own best financial interests and will only fall further behind the SEC, Pac 12 and Big Ten in revenues.

The only thing, according to this belief, that the ACC GOR actually did was also potentially doom the Big 12.

If the Big 12 can just hang on (because they will make more than the ACC but less than the others) until the ACC GOR expires, the Big 12 will then move to absorb the best 6 schools of the ACC.

Try to keep up, guys......

I got banned from the conference realignment board for saying this.

TerryD is only repeating what's being said

One irrefutable rebuttal to this line of thinking is that the B12 GOR is going to run out two years, I believe, before the ACC's. This will give the B1G, SEC and P12 a chance to make a run at Texas, OU, OSU, KU and TTU before the ACC even comes back into play.

The success of the various conference networks is going to be key in all of this. If the ACC Network is a big success, the current TV deal and GOR are likely to be extended well in advance of the current expiry, at a significant increase in the profit share to conference members in exchange for the extension.

A lot of WVU fans are just upset the are on an Island...my advice...deal with it...05-nono
05-08-2013 10:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.