Can we just get the belts while we're at it?

I think the sleeves are a legitimate concern. It seems some of the players spend most dead balls rolling up the current tank top portions. I'd venture a guess the sleeves might be even more cumbersome.

(02-27-2013 06:49 PM)JPBearcat3 Wrote:  I think the sleeves are a legitimate concern. It seems some of the players spend most dead balls rolling up the current tank top portions. I'd venture a guess the sleeves might be even more cumbersome.

The sleeves are tight fitting, pretty much like Cash wears normally, so that shouldn't be a problem. I hate how the players have to mess with their sleeves now.

That being said, I hate the sleeves on these new unis.

When you guys play pickup at the local playground, school or Y, do your T-shirts bother you? If so, you are probably different than more than 99% of the male population.

If they have sleeves, they have them. It's not a big deal. If they don't, they don't. It's not a big deal.

We really have more things to worry about than what what will bother the psyches of 13 guys.

Like finding someone in the front court who can score.

(02-27-2013 07:04 PM)ctipton Wrote:  When you guys play pickup at the local playground, school or Y, do your T-shirts bother you? If so, you are probably different than more than 99% of the male population.

If they have sleeves, they have them. It's not a big deal. If they don't, they don't. It's not a big deal.

We really have more things to worry about than what what will bother the psyches of 13 guys.

Like finding someone in the front court who can score.

This

(02-27-2013 07:04 PM)ctipton Wrote:  When you guys play pickup at the local playground, school or Y, do your T-shirts bother you? If so, you are probably different than more than 99% of the male population.

If they have sleeves, they have them. It's not a big deal. If they don't, they don't. It's not a big deal.

We really have more things to worry about than what what will bother the psyches of 13 guys.

Like finding someone in the front court who can score.

In the grand scheme of things, you are 100% correct....

but dammit, those things are ugly

(02-27-2013 07:45 PM)pat5775 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 07:04 PM)ctipton Wrote:  When you guys play pickup at the local playground, school or Y, do your T-shirts bother you? If so, you are probably different than more than 99% of the male population.

If they have sleeves, they have them. It's not a big deal. If they don't, they don't. It's not a big deal.

We really have more things to worry about than what what will bother the psyches of 13 guys.

Like finding someone in the front court who can score.

In the grand scheme of things, you are 100% correct....

but dammit, those things are ugly

yup...are so are Oregon's fb uniforms (most of them) but people talk about them. I believe in the "there is no such thing as bad press" theory. These are ugly, but people WILL talk about them...even if only to say "those are ugly". It gets Cincinnati Bearcats on the mind.....a good thing. If we go on a miracle run it will be even better...

Most fellas will take one look, say "Fugly!", and then remember UC for the rest of the year. No big deal.

Seen this article about the new unis for March. At the bottom is a slideshow of the flashest college basketball jerseys this year. The black uni makes an appearance.

Adidas New Unis for March

Does UC still get to wear the new unis if they end up in the NIT?
Not expecting them to tank out the season and end up in the NIT but it is a possibility.

(02-27-2013 08:11 PM)s10bball Wrote:  Seen this article about the new unis for March. At the bottom is a slideshow of the flashest college basketball jerseys this year. The black uni makes an appearance.

Adidas New Unis for March

They spelled Cincinnati wrong

(02-27-2013 07:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 07:45 PM)pat5775 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 07:04 PM)ctipton Wrote:  When you guys play pickup at the local playground, school or Y, do your T-shirts bother you? If so, you are probably different than more than 99% of the male population.

If they have sleeves, they have them. It's not a big deal. If they don't, they don't. It's not a big deal.

We really have more things to worry about than what what will bother the psyches of 13 guys.

Like finding someone in the front court who can score.

In the grand scheme of things, you are 100% correct....

but dammit, those things are ugly

yup...are so are Oregon's fb uniforms (most of them) but people talk about them. I believe in the "there is no such thing as bad press" theory. These are ugly, but people WILL talk about them...even if only to say "those are ugly". It gets Cincinnati Bearcats on the mind.....a good thing. If we go on a miracle run it will be even better...

I'm sorry, but I honestly don't see how a uniform change can inspire a miracle run. I'm hoping the team does win out and goes on a tear in the tournament(s), but if they do, it will be for other reasons besides some different uniforms... Just a coincidence.

And why would you want people talking about UC's ugly uniforms? Sure, I agree that there is no such thing as bad press... but I'd much rather the team be known for being a consistent winner than for wearing hideous uniforms (and let's be real, Oregon is talked about because they're a perennial top ten team, they're huge variety of uniforms is just another thing people notice).

(02-27-2013 07:49 PM)ctipton Wrote:  Most fellas will take one look, say "Fugly!", and then remember UC for the rest of the year. No big deal.

True, they will remember them... but for the wrong reasons.

ZUBAZZ!!

Our players aren't old enough to remember zubaz pants. What's old is new again...
Honestly don't mind them. If the players like them, all the better.

(02-28-2013 10:05 AM)HattoriHanzo Wrote:  Our players aren't old enough to remember zubaz pants. What's old is new again...
Honestly don't mind them. If the players like them, all the better.

i'm seriously starting to question whether adidas is on our side...

I wonder is anyone at Adidas knows what the color red looks like.

Though I find the camo look a little strange, I can live with it just fine. But why is our red more of a neon orange once again?

The white ones arent too bad. I kind of like them. The tops of the black are pretty nice too, but those pants are just ugly

(02-28-2013 10:34 AM)coachpipe Wrote:  The white ones arent too bad. I kind of like them. The tops of the black are pretty nice too, but those pants are just ugly

They just need to hit the reset button on their design team. Atrocious last season, atrocious this season. i don't care if the kids like them. The kids will like a lot of stuff that's less schizophrenic than those items.

I was actually looking forward to the sleeved look. Oh well. They pretty much look just like last year's version, just with different colors. I really don't have a problem with them or Adidas, especially after seeing the awful jerseys that Nike has been producing lately.

(02-28-2013 10:01 AM)eroc Wrote:  ZUBAZZ!!

So I guess the whole sleeve-look has been dropped?? Praise the Lord...


And honestly, I don't mind the tops themselves (even though that doesn't really look "red"). But those pants are atrocious. I really don't know what adidas has been thinking these past couple of years... they're almost making me miss Nike...

Can we sign a deal with Under Armour anytime soon?