Tulane 75, Tulsa 72
UCF 79, Houston 75 (OT)
UTEP 63, SMU 54
USM 74, UAB 59
Marshall 77, ECU 56

In non-conf games:
Memphis 60, Harvard 50
Rice 95, New Orleans 71

CUSA STANDINGS (ESPN.com)
USM 4-0 (15-4)
Memphis 3-0 (14-3)
UTEP 3-1 (10-7)
UCF 2-1 (12-5)
Marshall 2-1 (9-9)
Tulsa 3-2 (11-8)
ECU 2-2 (11-6)
Tulane 1-2 ((13-5)
Houston 1-3 (12-5)
SMU 1-4 (11-9)
UAB 0-3 (8-10)
Rice 0-3 (4-13)

My version of how the conference standings are:
USM +2
Memphis +2
UTEP +1
UCF +1
Tulsa +1
Marshall 0
ECU 0
Tulane -2
Houston -2
UAB -2
SMU -4
Rice -4

Teams get +1 for road wins, 0 for home wins, and -2 for home losses

(01-20-2013 10:18 AM)stanman505 Wrote:  My version of how the conference standings are:
USM +2
Memphis +2
UTEP +1
UCF +1
Tulsa +1
Marshall 0
ECU 0
Tulane -2
Houston -2
UAB -2
SMU -4
Rice -4

Teams get +1 for road wins, 0 for home wins, and -2 for home losses

I assume road losses also = 0?

(01-20-2013 10:20 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(01-20-2013 10:18 AM)stanman505 Wrote:  My version of how the conference standings are:
USM +2
Memphis +2
UTEP +1
UCF +1
Tulsa +1
Marshall 0
ECU 0
Tulane -2
Houston -2
UAB -2
SMU -4
Rice -4

Teams get +1 for road wins, 0 for home wins, and -2 for home losses

I assume road losses also = 0?

Sorry. Yes a road loss is also 0

Shouldn't your system be

+2 for road win
+1 for home win
-1 for road loss
-2 for home loss


??

(01-20-2013 04:30 PM)fedale Wrote:  Shouldn't your system be

+2 for road win
+1 for home win
-1 for road loss
-2 for home loss


??

A home loss is the worst thing for a team. A road win is good but a home loss is so damaging that it deserves a -2. This was the system that Haskins used to go by.

Middle of the pack as expected I guess.

@ UAB on Wed

UTEP on Sat