Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
mistabinks Offline
Glory Road Resident
*

Posts: 7,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 399
I Root For: UTEP Miners
Location: Glory Road - El Paso
Post: #1
UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
I really don't care about Fresno. If UNLV stays in the MWC, we need to shag ass ASAP.
12-21-2012 02:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Pyrizzo Offline
Eyes in the Sky
*

Posts: 3,642
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 235
I Root For: nothing
Location:
Post: #2
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
(12-21-2012 02:16 PM)mistabinks Wrote:  I really don't care about Fresno. If UNLV stays in the MWC, we need to shag ass ASAP.

Haha. Lets just really hope they did and its not all wordplay
12-21-2012 03:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
randaddyminer Offline
Banned

Posts: 11,028
Joined: Jan 2010
I Root For: UTEP miners
Location:
Post: #3
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
This conference would be ideal

MWC - East
Houston
SMU
New Mexico
UTEP
Tulsa
Air Force
Colo St
Wyoming

MWC-West
Boise
Utah St
Nevada
UNLV
SDSU
Fresno
San Jose St
Hawaii football/BYU bball

Of course there are some schools I wouldn't mind trading for USM and Memphis but those schools are currently in the MWC, so that couldn't happen
12-21-2012 03:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mistabinks Offline
Glory Road Resident
*

Posts: 7,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 399
I Root For: UTEP Miners
Location: Glory Road - El Paso
Post: #4
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
I don't think SMU or Houston will leave the nBE.

I'm realistically hoping for the current MWC-10 plus UTEP and Tulsa.
12-21-2012 05:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pyrizzo Offline
Eyes in the Sky
*

Posts: 3,642
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 235
I Root For: nothing
Location:
Post: #5
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
(12-21-2012 03:51 PM)randaddyminer Wrote:  This conference would be ideal

MWC - East
Houston
SMU
New Mexico
UTEP
Tulsa
Air Force
Colo St
Wyoming

MWC-West
Boise
Utah St
Nevada
UNLV
SDSU
Fresno
San Jose St
Hawaii football/BYU bball

Of course there are some schools I wouldn't mind trading for USM and Memphis but those schools are currently in the MWC, so that couldn't happen

This would be a great scenario...and an airport meeting seems to be in the works as well. We better not get left out of this one.

Link
12-21-2012 07:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


RUNVSFD MINER Offline
The voice in your head...See?
*

Posts: 7,608
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 451
I Root For: UTEP
Location:
Post: #6
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
According to the Wyoming poster on the Realignment Board claiming to be in-the-know (seems legit, but who doesn't? -lol), looks like UTEP is being included in the 14 and 16 team MWC scenario. Who knows....

Houston, SMU, Memphis, and even Cinci/UConn fans think their team is going to the MWC. Some laugh at UTEP being looked at, but they totally underestimate UTEP's history with those teams, and how many of their fans want UTEP with them.

In the end, looks like UTEP might actually have 3 options. Just glad we didn't pay fees without solid footing.

I'm starting to think that the worst-case scenario is that we will end up with Memphis, Cinci, ECU, Tulane, etc..... So we lose no ground.
(This post was last modified: 12-23-2012 07:17 PM by RUNVSFD MINER.)
12-23-2012 07:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mistabinks Offline
Glory Road Resident
*

Posts: 7,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 399
I Root For: UTEP Miners
Location: Glory Road - El Paso
Post: #7
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
Worst case scenario is we stay in cusa w/ no Tulsa. Worst case scenario is a best of conference forming to our west and to our east both without us. It can get bad for us.

I don't see the nBE inviting us.

I hope the nMWC invites us (again).

I no longer see a new conference forming.
12-24-2012 03:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Journeyman22 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 343
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 6
I Root For: South Alabama
Location:
Post: #8
UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
(12-24-2012 03:38 PM)mistabinks Wrote:  Worst case scenario is we stay in cusa w/ no Tulsa. Worst case scenario is a best of conference forming to our west and to our east both without us. It can get bad for us.

I don't see the nBE inviting us.

I hope the nMWC invites us (again).

I no longer see a new conference forming.

I don't think UTEP gets left behind for a second. The Miners make a ton of sense for the MWC, and that's the one conference that seems to be doing sensible things.
12-24-2012 03:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mistabinks Offline
Glory Road Resident
*

Posts: 7,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 399
I Root For: UTEP Miners
Location: Glory Road - El Paso
Post: #9
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
(12-24-2012 03:47 PM)Journeyman22 Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 03:38 PM)mistabinks Wrote:  Worst case scenario is we stay in cusa w/ no Tulsa. Worst case scenario is a best of conference forming to our west and to our east both without us. It can get bad for us.

I don't see the nBE inviting us.

I hope the nMWC invites us (again).

I no longer see a new conference forming.

I don't think UTEP gets left behind for a second. The Miners make a ton of sense for the MWC, and that's the one conference that seems to be doing sensible things.

I hope you are right. USU and SJSU are holding two valuable seats at the MWC table.
12-24-2012 05:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


RUNVSFD MINER Offline
The voice in your head...See?
*

Posts: 7,608
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 451
I Root For: UTEP
Location:
Post: #10
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
(12-24-2012 03:38 PM)mistabinks Wrote:  Worst case scenario is we stay in cusa w/ no Tulsa. Worst case scenario is a best of conference forming to our west and to our east both without us. It can get bad for us.

I don't see the nBE inviting us.

I hope the nMWC invites us (again).

I no longer see a new conference forming.

Most of what I read, seems to include UTEP in the MWC.

Maybe I had already resigned myself to being in the new CUSA, and see nothing but opportunity in any of the scenarios. Even if left in CUSA, I could see us becoming the UNLV of the Big West (or whatever conf they were in, when they were the national bball powerhouse).
12-24-2012 08:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pyrizzo Offline
Eyes in the Sky
*

Posts: 3,642
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 235
I Root For: nothing
Location:
Post: #11
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
(12-24-2012 08:25 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 03:38 PM)mistabinks Wrote:  Worst case scenario is we stay in cusa w/ no Tulsa. Worst case scenario is a best of conference forming to our west and to our east both without us. It can get bad for us.

I don't see the nBE inviting us.

I hope the nMWC invites us (again).

I no longer see a new conference forming.

Most of what I read, seems to include UTEP in the MWC.

Maybe I had already resigned myself to being in the new CUSA, and see nothing but opportunity in any of the scenarios. Even if left in CUSA, I could see us becoming the UNLV of the Big West (or whatever conf they were in, when they were the national bball powerhouse).


This is probably the best route. I have settled with the fact that our football is our only inhibiting factor in this realignment environment. It's best to settle and then jump for joy if invited, more so if UTEP actually pays the exit fee to accept.
(This post was last modified: 12-25-2012 12:06 PM by Pyrizzo.)
12-25-2012 12:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mistabinks Offline
Glory Road Resident
*

Posts: 7,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 399
I Root For: UTEP Miners
Location: Glory Road - El Paso
Post: #12
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
It is so frustrating that UTEP showed loyalty to CUSA and passed on an MWC invite that eventually went to SJSU. Now they are in a much better position than us.
12-25-2012 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mistabinks Offline
Glory Road Resident
*

Posts: 7,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 399
I Root For: UTEP Miners
Location: Glory Road - El Paso
Post: #13
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
While not off topic and not breaking any rules, can we delete that post or move it somewhere else. This is the UTEP board. Not the Pimp nBE board or Pimp Memphis board. If I wanted to hear that type of opinion I would have posted on the general board.
12-25-2012 08:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


RUNVSFD MINER Offline
The voice in your head...See?
*

Posts: 7,608
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 451
I Root For: UTEP
Location:
Post: #14
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
I responded to the post. But then, after reading it again, I did see it was a lighter form of smack/pimping, so I sent it to the CUSA smack forum.
12-25-2012 10:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RUNVSFD MINER Offline
The voice in your head...See?
*

Posts: 7,608
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 451
I Root For: UTEP
Location:
Post: #15
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
Looks like teams like UNLV, are starting to see past the empty promises. The one that really gets on my nerves, is the Market argument.

Well look at this link for how much a market means.
Poinsetta Bowl Ratings- SUCK LINK 01-wingedeagle 03-lmfao01-wingedeagle03-lmfao

Versus the same team: BYU/UTEP New Mexico Bowl: 1.8 U.S. rating and 2.789 million viewers
(This post was last modified: 12-25-2012 10:51 PM by RUNVSFD MINER.)
12-25-2012 10:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mistabinks Offline
Glory Road Resident
*

Posts: 7,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 399
I Root For: UTEP Miners
Location: Glory Road - El Paso
Post: #16
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
I haven't been following this 24/7 but the last I heard/read was that the MWC schools (not including BS or SDSU) were staying put. Its in UTEP best interest if BSU or SDSU head east. Increases our chances of heading west.
12-25-2012 11:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RUNVSFD MINER Offline
The voice in your head...See?
*

Posts: 7,608
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 451
I Root For: UTEP
Location:
Post: #17
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
This OP seems to be hearing some stuff FWIW. Who knows, but it doesn't sound like pimping or just wishful thinking. Interesting stuff either way, based on what he is hearing over at Wyoming's athletic dept offices.
LINK

It sounds like the start of this REO Speedwagon song "heard from a friend who, heard it from a friend who....." 03-lmfao


12-25-2012 11:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fitbud Offline
Banned

Posts: 30,983
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
Post: #18
RE: UNLV rumored to have told nBE to **** off
It doesn't seem likely to me that MWC schools would want to form a 16 team conference. Isn't that the reason why they left the WAC?

I think it is more likely that the MWC wants to stay at 10 schools. Therefore I have to agree that UTEP's best chances come from Boise and San Diego leaving.

It's a catch 22. If those schools stay, the conference looks good but UTEP is likely out.

If they go, UTEP could get in but the conference becomes more like the Big West.
12-29-2012 09:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.