PirateTreasureNC
G's up, Ho's Down ; )
Posts: 36,249
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 617
I Root For: ECU Pirates,
Location:
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
(12-01-2012 08:41 PM)cotton1991 Wrote: (11-26-2012 12:43 AM)EdM Wrote: Any way we can get a basketball breakdown as it stood prior to the start of this season? I'd be curious to see how the teams fall into place after Memphis and UAB...
Memphis basketball had .831 from the 2005-06 season through the 2011-12 season.
33-4
33-4
38-2
33-4
24-10
25-10
26-9
What about all those vacated wins
|
|
12-01-2012 08:45 PM |
|
Tulsafanzz
1st String
Posts: 1,609
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 57
I Root For: Tulsa
Location:
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
BTW, Thanks JMS Tiger for putting that list together. Going to miss half of those teams on that list.
Not a knock on anyone, literally half of that list is leaving !
|
|
12-01-2012 09:09 PM |
|
cotton1991
Heisman
Posts: 9,665
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 301
I Root For: Memphis
Location: MasonCity North Iowa
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
(12-01-2012 08:45 PM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote: (12-01-2012 08:41 PM)cotton1991 Wrote: (11-26-2012 12:43 AM)EdM Wrote: Any way we can get a basketball breakdown as it stood prior to the start of this season? I'd be curious to see how the teams fall into place after Memphis and UAB...
Memphis basketball had .831 from the 2005-06 season through the 2011-12 season.
33-4
33-4
38-2
33-4
24-10
25-10
26-9
What about all those vacated wins
.621
|
|
12-01-2012 09:12 PM |
|
ShockerBob
SHOCKERS
Posts: 11,227
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 273
I Root For: the SHOCKER
Location:
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
Dammit! this year really cost us!
|
|
12-01-2012 09:49 PM |
|
ShockerBob
SHOCKERS
Posts: 11,227
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 273
I Root For: the SHOCKER
Location:
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
West is best baby!
Hats off to Tulsa today. Year in year out a contender.
"SB you dumbazz, east just beats up on itself"
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2012 09:50 PM by ShockerBob.)
|
|
12-01-2012 09:50 PM |
|
JMSTiger
Just More Stats
Posts: 32,761
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 653
I Root For: Memphis
Location: East Memphis
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
(11-26-2012 12:43 AM)EdM Wrote: Any way we can get a basketball breakdown as it stood prior to the start of this season? I'd be curious to see how the teams fall into place after Memphis and UAB...
Sorry for the delay...here you go:
Conference USA Regular Season Men’s Basketball Standings Since Realignment (2005-06 season to the present)
1. Memphis…97-13* (.882)…Championships: 5* (2006, 2007, 2008*, 2009, 2012)
2. UAB…74-36 (.673)…Championships: 1 (2011)
3. UTEP…68-42 (.618)…Championships: 1 (2010)
4. Tulsa…66-44 (.600)
5. Houston…58-52 (.527)
6. Marshall…56-54 (.509)
6. UCF…56-54 (.509)
8. Southern Mississippi…53-57 (.482)
9. Tulane…37-73 (.336)
10. SMU…33-77 (.300)
11. Rice…32-78 (.291)
12. East Carolina…30-80 (.273)
*Includes the 2007-08 season (16-0) that was later vacated by the NCAA
|
|
12-12-2012 01:25 AM |
|
RedParallax
Special Teams
Posts: 512
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 34
I Root For: Marshall
Location: Albany, NY
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
Fantastically mediocre. WE ARE! AVERAGE!
|
|
12-12-2012 07:38 AM |
|
shiftyeagle
Deus Vult
Posts: 14,617
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 550
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In the Pass
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
That nice 0-8 mark this year sure as hell doesn't help us much.
|
|
12-12-2012 08:11 AM |
|
oldtiger
Forgiven Through Jesus' Grace
Posts: 23,014
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Germantown
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
(12-12-2012 01:25 AM)JMSTiger Wrote: (11-26-2012 12:43 AM)EdM Wrote: Any way we can get a basketball breakdown as it stood prior to the start of this season? I'd be curious to see how the teams fall into place after Memphis and UAB...
Sorry for the delay...here you go:
Conference USA Regular Season Men’s Basketball Standings Since Realignment (2005-06 season to the present)
1. Memphis…97-13* (.882)…Championships: 5* (2006, 2007, 2008*, 2009, 2012)
2. UAB…74-36 (.673)…Championships: 1 (2011)
3. UTEP…68-42 (.618)…Championships: 1 (2010)
4. Tulsa…66-44 (.600)
5. Houston…58-52 (.527)
6. Marshall…56-54 (.509)
6. UCF…56-54 (.509)
8. Southern Mississippi…53-57 (.482)
9. Tulane…37-73 (.336)
10. SMU…33-77 (.300)
11. Rice…32-78 (.291)
12. East Carolina…30-80 (.273)
*Includes the 2007-08 season (16-0) that was later vacated by the NCAA
It's interesting that, despite all of the coaching changes and even turmoil at the top 4 programs, if any of us were asked in 2005 to honestly predict the top 4; Tulsa, UTEP, UAB, and Memphis are the exact programs the vast majority would have predicted. Despite everyone's peaks and valleys for all, this played out mostly like fans expected.
|
|
12-12-2012 05:46 PM |
|
oldtiger
Forgiven Through Jesus' Grace
Posts: 23,014
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Germantown
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
(12-01-2012 04:21 PM)PGPirate Wrote:
Code:
Team Win/Win% Athletic Revenue Revenue/win
(2011)
1. Houston: 45-19 (.703) $34,614,033 (3) 769,201 (2)
2. East Carolina: 44-20 (.688) $34,048,869 (4) 773,838 (3)
3. UCF: 43-21 (.672) $42,762,625 (1) 994,480 (5)
4. USM: 36-28 (.563) $20,673,597 (8) 574,267 (1)
5. Marshall: 30-34 (.469) $27,444,906 (6) 914,830 (4)
6. UTEP: 24-40 (.375) $27,694,358 (5) 1,153,932 (6)
7. Memphis: 22-42 (.344) $40,384,265 (2) 1,835,648 (8)
8. UAB: 21-43 (.328) $25,690,048 (7) 1,223,336 (7)
So I took OPs updated data, and used the USA TODAY Sports' College Athletics Finances to give me the revenue in 2011. Then I figured the amount of revenue made, per win.
Private schools don't submit this data.
_____________________________________
Not too many surprises. Of course, even with this atrocious year, USM still is getting the best bang for their buck. Memphis focus is clearly on bball and not fball.
All teams (minus Memphis/USM) are within one or two places in all three columns.
That's a great site, I use it all the time in trying to noodle through what group of programs best fit together.
I know that it's all in fun and getting 8 years of data aren't available on the site, but those averages are assuming that the revenue for one year affect football wins for 7 or 8 years, right? Using 8 years revenue numbers make each win for everyone much more expensive. Again, I know that it's all in fun, it's a rough gauge, and athletic funds go to many more sports than football.
Using this year as a base, USM spent either $20 million + per win or $0 per win depending on how you view "0" and Memphis spent $10 million per win.
|
|
12-12-2012 06:00 PM |
|
Thegoldstandard
Heisman
Posts: 6,823
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 370
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
(12-12-2012 06:00 PM)oldtiger Wrote: (12-01-2012 04:21 PM)PGPirate Wrote:
Code:
Team Win/Win% Athletic Revenue Revenue/win
(2011)
1. Houston: 45-19 (.703) $34,614,033 (3) 769,201 (2)
2. East Carolina: 44-20 (.688) $34,048,869 (4) 773,838 (3)
3. UCF: 43-21 (.672) $42,762,625 (1) 994,480 (5)
4. USM: 36-28 (.563) $20,673,597 (8) 574,267 (1)
5. Marshall: 30-34 (.469) $27,444,906 (6) 914,830 (4)
6. UTEP: 24-40 (.375) $27,694,358 (5) 1,153,932 (6)
7. Memphis: 22-42 (.344) $40,384,265 (2) 1,835,648 (8)
8. UAB: 21-43 (.328) $25,690,048 (7) 1,223,336 (7)
So I took OPs updated data, and used the USA TODAY Sports' College Athletics Finances to give me the revenue in 2011. Then I figured the amount of revenue made, per win.
Private schools don't submit this data.
_____________________________________
Not too many surprises. Of course, even with this atrocious year, USM still is getting the best bang for their buck. Memphis focus is clearly on bball and not fball.
All teams (minus Memphis/USM) are within one or two places in all three columns.
That's a great site, I use it all the time in trying to noodle through what group of programs best fit together.
I know that it's all in fun and getting 8 years of data aren't available on the site, but those averages are assuming that the revenue for one year affect football wins for 7 or 8 years, right? Using 8 years revenue numbers make each win for everyone much more expensive. Again, I know that it's all in fun, it's a rough gauge, and athletic funds go to many more sports than football.
Using this year as a base, USM spent either $20 million + per win or $0 per win depending on how you view "0" and Memphis spent $10 million per win.
Wezze Po
|
|
12-12-2012 06:22 PM |
|
eaglenjxn
All American
Posts: 2,726
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 58
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
|
RE: Conference USA Regular Season Football Standings, 2005-2012
Really an eye-opener for USM fans.
Shows how mediocre we've been the last seven years.
Here's to Monken getting us back on track.
|
|
12-13-2012 02:19 AM |
|