Who didn't see that coming?

It'll be 31-21 in a few moments, folks.

(10-06-2012 04:10 PM)CMichFan Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:09 PM)arrows80 Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 03:27 PM)CMichFan Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 03:26 PM)arrows80 Wrote:  Offense hasn't done much lately. 21 points won't come close to winning this game.

I like this Reedy kid. Toledo should keep feeding him the ball.

Not a good way to end the half.

You and your big mouth.

All kidding aside, we probably have the worst special teams in the FBS.

I said TOLEDO give him the ball, not us punt it to him. :muttering:

stupid ass play to run on 4th down jeesh

(10-06-2012 04:16 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:10 PM)CMichFan Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:09 PM)arrows80 Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 03:27 PM)CMichFan Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 03:26 PM)arrows80 Wrote:  Offense hasn't done much lately. 21 points won't come close to winning this game.

I like this Reedy kid. Toledo should keep feeding him the ball.

Not a good way to end the half.

You and your big mouth.

All kidding aside, we probably have the worst special teams in the FBS.

I said TOLEDO give him the ball, not us punt it to him. :muttering:

stupid ass play to run on 4th down jeesh

Why do our short-yardage plays seem to take so long to develop? Was the handoff telegraphed or not crisp? Seemed to be a moment of hesitation.

(10-06-2012 04:16 PM)arrows80 Wrote:  Who didn't see that coming?

It'll be 31-21 in a few moments, folks.

...aaaaaaand there it is.

You know, when I watch our defense I really have no idea what we're trying to accomplish. What is it designed to stop? We give up huge chunks of yards against the run AND the pass.

you cannot expect the d to contain these guys on a 50 yrd field as what Enos just made em do. We already know our D is not our strong point and now he just put us down by 2 scores. It was way too early to go for the 4th down and now the game is slipping away.

(10-06-2012 04:26 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  you cannot expect the d to contain these guys on a 50 yrd field as what Enos just made em do. We already know our D is not our strong point and now he just put us down by 2 scores. It was way too early to go for the 4th down and now the game is slipping away.

gettyup right back in it if this play sticks

(10-06-2012 04:34 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:26 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  you cannot expect the d to contain these guys on a 50 yrd field as what Enos just made em do. We already know our D is not our strong point and now he just put us down by 2 scores. It was way too early to go for the 4th down and now the game is slipping away.

gettyup right back in it if this play sticks

(10-06-2012 04:35 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:34 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:26 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  you cannot expect the d to contain these guys on a 50 yrd field as what Enos just made em do. We already know our D is not our strong point and now he just put us down by 2 scores. It was way too early to go for the 4th down and now the game is slipping away.

gettyup right back in it if this play sticks

Part of me likes the 4th down call. Part of me hates it. All of me hates the play call, given the decision to go for it. But we answered the bell. Would be great if the D can come up with another loose ball now.

Nice answer by the offense.

C'mon, D...how about another turnover?

D fence D fence D fence

31-28 at the end of three. Can our defense get some stops? If so, I like our chances.

i never want to see a peacock ever, it will remind me of this stupid commercial they keep airing on espn3

Night night.

F me arggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg,

(10-06-2012 04:55 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  F me arggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg,

Saw that pick as the ball left Radcliff's hand. Stared down the receiver the whole way.

(10-06-2012 04:56 PM)CMichFan Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:55 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  F me arggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg,

Saw that pick as the ball left Radcliff's hand. Stared down the receiver the whole way.

yep, he could have run a qb sneek and easily picked up the first. they had 4 man front and were so spaced out.

(10-06-2012 04:58 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:56 PM)CMichFan Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 04:55 PM)cmufanatic Wrote:  F me arggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg,

Saw that pick as the ball left Radcliff's hand. Stared down the receiver the whole way.

yep, he could have run a qb sneek and easily picked up the first. they had 4 man front and were so spaced out.

Thank you Jaleel, no 2pt conversion.

It's too bad, because RR has played pretty well otherwise.

(10-06-2012 05:00 PM)arrows80 Wrote:  It's too bad, because RR has played pretty well otherwise.

agree

common lets hury up