Well, Aresco doesn't agree with Delany:

"You've read about the seventh bowl that commissioners are considering that we think eventually will happen. That'll give the Big East needed access to the highest level of the new system….It would be a contract bowl where you'd have to put the bowl together but would have obviously semifinal games.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/col...1969.story

tell you what...I LOVE having Aresco in our corner. I hope we can retain him for YEARS. this guy is gonna get things done....just watch.

If the Big East EVER hit a homerun...it was hiring him.

(10-05-2012 02:58 PM)UHCougar Wrote:  

(10-05-2012 02:47 PM)fresco Wrote:  

(10-05-2012 01:50 PM)IceJus10 Wrote:  The Big Ten doesn't have the votes to stop this being a 7th Contract Bowl, unless the Big Ten and the ACC are going to pitch an idea about more equally sharing the playoff and bowl revenue streams to buy remaining at 6 games. The Big East, the Big 12, Pac 12, MWC, C-USA, Sun Belt, and MAC together are enough to get it done!

I do not believe that anything will happen if it is opposed by both the B1G and SEC, and by your account it seems that they both oppose this 7th bcs bowl.

Riiiiggggghhhhhhtttttt . . . the BIG and SEC are going to turn down the MILLIONS of dollars that flow from another 7th BCS bowl, or tell the Big XII/SEC that they can't make that money.

You should have modified this post a LOT more.

(10-05-2012 06:28 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  tell you what...I LOVE having Aresco in our corner. I hope we can retain him for YEARS. this guy is gonna get things done....just watch.

If the Big East EVER hit a homerun...it was hiring him.

Agreed. Aresco seems to be the best possible advocate for the Big East.