(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

Honest question, when was the last time Tech was acknowledged by LSU?

(09-17-2012 12:02 AM)TexasWarhawkBrother Wrote:  Lets see how things play out in conference before you go spouting off at the mouth there guy.

At this point in the season, this is good advice for everybody.

Anyone that draws correlations between OOC play and Conference play is fooling themselves. History has shown that repeatedly in this conference (Most recent example- WKU was left for dead going o'fer in OOC last year).

That said, I think we're both going to have a good time lighting up the score board on Tulane!

(09-17-2012 10:27 AM)Eagle Green Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

Honest question, when was the last time Tech was acknowledged by LSU?

Giving credit where credit is due, Tech actually gave LSU a good game the last time Tech went to Tiger Stadium a few years ago.

(09-17-2012 10:34 AM)AstroCajun Wrote:  Giving credit where credit is due, Tech actually gave LSU a good game the last time Tech went to Tiger Stadium a few years ago.

So did Troy a few years ago.

ULM finished, while the others didnt.

(09-16-2012 09:49 PM)TexasWarhawkBrother Wrote:  cajunhawk is a hater

cajunhawk is a bigger hater than silky johnson!

(09-17-2012 10:27 AM)Eagle Green Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

Honest question, when was the last time Tech was acknowledged by LSU?

three years ago when we were beating them and within a touchdown in the fourth quarter in Baton Rouge?

(09-17-2012 06:51 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z

nice game there Z.

(09-17-2012 06:51 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z

If we plyed ULM I would expect a total shootout but i think our offense would be too much but i still see a close game. If Tech played ULL I see a 35 point blowout with us scoring in the fifties again. But hey you guys should be used to that by now.

(09-17-2012 02:07 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 06:51 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z

If we plyed ULM I would expect a total shootout but i think our offense would be too much but i still see a close game. If Tech played ULL I see a 35 point blowout with us scoring in the fifties again. But hey you guys should be used to that by now.

And thats why you went to latex. get a clue.

Z

(09-17-2012 04:41 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:07 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 06:51 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z

If we plyed ULM I would expect a total shootout but i think our offense would be too much but i still see a close game. If Tech played ULL I see a 35 point blowout with us scoring in the fifties again. But hey you guys should be used to that by now.

And thats why you went to latex. get a clue.

Z

Dont Mess With The Belt just ask the SEC !

(09-17-2012 02:01 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 10:27 AM)Eagle Green Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

Honest question, when was the last time Tech was acknowledged by LSU?

three years ago when we were beating them and within a touchdown in the fourth quarter in Baton Rouge?

Have ya'll played a game yet this year? I know you had some practices against scrub teams that haven't won a game.

(09-16-2012 09:49 PM)TexasWarhawkBrother Wrote:  cajunhawk is a hater

Dude. Your brother is a BEAST!!! He's playing at a really high level right now. On the other hand, the fact that Arkansas and Auburn are way overrated doesn't take away from what your brother and those boys over at ULM have done. Sun Belt teams have played against the worst SEC teams countless times and have lost almost every single one.

(09-17-2012 05:27 PM)CivilEng Wrote:  

(09-16-2012 09:49 PM)TexasWarhawkBrother Wrote:  cajunhawk is a hater

Dude. Your brother is a BEAST!!! He's playing at a really high level right now. On the other hand, the fact that Arkansas and Auburn are way overrated doesn't take away from what your brother and those boys over at ULM have done. Sun Belt teams have played against the worst SEC teams countless times and have lost almost every single one.

I know he is a BEAST !!! Who do you think taught him growing up ? I made him play against me and my boys in all 3 sports !!!! He was playing at a high-level in HS and has been capable of playing like that all the time.

(09-17-2012 04:41 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:07 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 06:51 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  [quote='theATLDawg' pid='8278641' dateline='1347868227']
Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z
[/quote

If we plyed ULM I would expect a total shootout but i think our offense would be too much but i still see a close game. If Tech played ULL I see a 35 point blowout with us scoring in the fifties again. But hey you guys should be used to that by now.

And thats why you went to latex. get a clue.

Z

Z I did even better. I got 65 clues. And they all came out of stillwater last week.

(09-17-2012 07:48 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 04:41 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:07 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 06:51 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  [quote='theATLDawg' pid='8278641' dateline='1347868227']
Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z
[/quote

If we plyed ULM I would expect a total shootout but i think our offense would be too much but i still see a close game. If Tech played ULL I see a 35 point blowout with us scoring in the fifties again. But hey you guys should be used to that by now.

And thats why you went to latex. get a clue.

Z

Z I did even better. I got 65 clues. And they all came out of stillwater last week.

Honestly L-T-U wouldn't have done any better. Oklahoma State's offense is difficult to stop, by anyone.

(09-17-2012 07:49 PM)mtsufan561 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 07:48 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 04:41 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:07 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 06:51 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  [quote='theATLDawg' pid='8278641' dateline='1347868227']
Please the second best team in the state of Louisiana is La Tech. But I will say ULM is the real deal and they with the exception of WKU will clean up on the Belt this year.

You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z
[/quote

If we plyed ULM I would expect a total shootout but i think our offense would be too much but i still see a close game. If Tech played ULL I see a 35 point blowout with us scoring in the fifties again. But hey you guys should be used to that by now.

And thats why you went to latex. get a clue.

Z

Z I did even better. I got 65 clues. And they all came out of stillwater last week.

Honestly L-T-U wouldn't have done any better. Oklahoma State's offense is difficult to stop, by anyone.

I know we have one just like it. Thanks to your Tony Franklin. The gift that keeps on giving every time we have the football.

(09-17-2012 08:36 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 07:49 PM)mtsufan561 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 07:48 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 04:41 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 02:07 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  You're an idiot. Enjoy being a mid pack team in the worst conf in America next year...

Z
[/quote

If we plyed ULM I would expect a total shootout but i think our offense would be too much but i still see a close game. If Tech played ULL I see a 35 point blowout with us scoring in the fifties again. But hey you guys should be used to that by now.

And thats why you went to latex. get a clue.

Z

Z I did even better. I got 65 clues. And they all came out of stillwater last week.

Honestly L-T-U wouldn't have done any better. Oklahoma State's offense is difficult to stop, by anyone.

I know we have one just like it. Thanks to your Tony Franklin. The gift that keeps on giving every time we have the football.

Sad performance indeed Dawg. But how many points and yards did LaTech give up to Houston, the team that Texas State laid wood too?

(09-17-2012 09:32 PM)CrazyCajun Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 08:36 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 07:49 PM)mtsufan561 Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 07:48 PM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 04:41 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  And thats why you went to latex. get a clue.

Z

Z I did even better. I got 65 clues. And they all came out of stillwater last week.

Honestly L-T-U wouldn't have done any better. Oklahoma State's offense is difficult to stop, by anyone.

I know we have one just like it. Thanks to your Tony Franklin. The gift that keeps on giving every time we have the football.

Sad performance indeed Dawg. But how many points and yards did LaTech give up to Houston, the team that Texas State laid wood too?

dude I know we look bad on paper. And we may very well be. I know our LBs are but we had 21 point leads on both of these teams in the fourth quarter. I don't know jury is still out. we will learn alot this weekend against Illinois. But our offense is scary good.

(09-17-2012 08:01 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 06:53 AM)SOT1977 Wrote:  For what it's worth mentioning...and, admittedly, it ain't worth that much but it makes ya think....here's an interesing comparison between halves that ULM and Alabama played against Arkansas:

First half scoring (with Tyler Wilson at QB):
ULM - 7
Ark - 21

Second half scoring (without Wilson and OT):
ULM - 21
Ark - 7

First half scoring (without Wilson):
Bama - 24
Ark - 0

Second half scoring (without Wilson and after Ark gave up):
Bama - 28
Ark - 0

Just a note. A ULM poster called a post of mine "stupid" when I made a comparison between common opponents a couple weeks ago. Is this one "stupid" as well?

Not the same thing. If it was "stupid" it would have said ULM beat Arkansas by 3 and Bama beat Ark by 52, so Bama would be ULM by 49. That's stupid.

(09-17-2012 10:10 PM)Chief Yankee Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 08:01 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(09-17-2012 06:53 AM)SOT1977 Wrote:  For what it's worth mentioning...and, admittedly, it ain't worth that much but it makes ya think....here's an interesing comparison between halves that ULM and Alabama played against Arkansas:

First half scoring (with Tyler Wilson at QB):
ULM - 7
Ark - 21

Second half scoring (without Wilson and OT):
ULM - 21
Ark - 7

First half scoring (without Wilson):
Bama - 24
Ark - 0

Second half scoring (without Wilson and after Ark gave up):
Bama - 28
Ark - 0

Just a note. A ULM poster called a post of mine "stupid" when I made a comparison between common opponents a couple weeks ago. Is this one "stupid" as well?

Not the same thing. If it was "stupid" it would have said ULM beat Arkansas by 3 and Bama beat Ark by 52, so Bama would be ULM by 49. That's stupid.

but bammer would beat ulm by 49.