Gray Avenger
Hall of Famer
Posts: 19,451
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 744
I Root For: MEMPHIS
Location: Memphis
|
How About A 3-Pod Football Set-up?
1: Boise St, San Diego St, BYU, Air Force, Navy
2: Houston, SMU, Memphis, Louisville, Cincinnati
3: UConn, Rutgers, Temple, USF, UCF
Natural pairings that cut down on travel.
|
|
08-28-2012 01:43 PM |
|
Knights_of_UCF
Heisman
Posts: 5,980
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 88
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: How About A 3-Pod Football Set-up?
pod systems will never work.
|
|
08-28-2012 01:58 PM |
|
Brian Reading
Special Teams
Posts: 810
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 28
I Root For: Houston
Location: Houston
|
RE: How About A 3-Pod Football Set-up?
Can we at least quit calling them "pods"? These are divisions. Just because there are more than 2 doesn't make it something new.
|
|
08-28-2012 02:01 PM |
|
CommuterBob
Head Tailgater
Posts: 5,840
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 173
I Root For: UCF, Ohio State
Location:
|
RE: How About A 3-Pod Football Set-up?
Until the NCAA allows a multi-round conference playoff, no more than 2 divisions should be set up.
I like this set-up:
Red: UConn, Rutgers, Temple, Navy, USF, SDSU, Houston
Blue: Louisville, Memphis, Cincinnati, BYU, UCF, Boise, SMU
Where the last three in each division have permanent crossovers: UCF-USF, Houston-SMU, Boise-SDSU. The rest rotate inter-divisional play.
That way all those that want to play each other every year can.
|
|
08-28-2012 02:13 PM |
|
MWC Tex
Heisman
Posts: 7,850
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 179
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
|
RE: How About A 3-Pod Football Set-up?
No more than 2 divisions and even at that the West is pretty strung out....ugly.
|
|
08-28-2012 02:15 PM |
|
Bull
Heisman
Posts: 5,374
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 397
I Root For: USF and the AAC!
Location:
|
RE: How About A 3-Pod Football Set-up?
Well it assumes we're taking BYU *and* AFA. We're at 13 now and have publicly stated we're going to 14... so this probably won't happen.
But if for some reason we HAD to go to 15, and didn't want to go to 16, this might be an option. Say, if BYU and AFA both came to their senses. Instead of choosing, we could just do this. (and avoid taking a #16 we really didn't want)
If we did this, would it mean a 2-round playoff? 3 + a wildcard, and winners play a CCG?
(This post was last modified: 08-28-2012 02:22 PM by Bull.)
|
|
08-28-2012 02:21 PM |
|
Attackcoog
Moderator
Posts: 44,885
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: How About A 3-Pod Football Set-up?
You can only have 2 divisions by NCAA rule. Every team in each division must play a round robin with everyone else in thier division by NCAA rule. The reason the WAC-16 pods qualified was because 2 pods were combined each season to create a division with the remaining 2 pods forming the other division. The pods would rotate each year--always forming 2 divisions, but because the pods rotated, the divisions would be made up of different teams. This was done to give the schools more exposure to the schools in the other pods. This is just one of the reasons that the 28-32 team "Aliiance" never got off the ground---once a conference exceeds 24 teams there is no room on a schools schedule for anything but conference games..
(This post was last modified: 08-28-2012 02:24 PM by Attackcoog.)
|
|
08-28-2012 02:21 PM |
|