Same here Hoquista. The Networks was move than generous w/ the Big XII though. Like how exactly is WVU & TCU more valuable than atm & Mizzou.

It has nothing to do TAMU and Mizzou verses WVU and TCU. That is comparing the bottom tier to the bottom tier. It is the top tier that gets the deals done. At the end of the day the Big 12 got a better deal because the networks feel that BEVO and OK are more valuable than FSU and Clemson. I would have to agree with them too. If the Noles were still blowin teams out with Dion Sanders this would be a non issue. The problem is the ACC top brass has been crap lately. We actually can thank our retarded hillbilly neighbors to the south of us. That 70 points that they dropped on Clemson hurt the ACC cred big time. Also didn't help that the Orange Bowl was horrible in the ratings. Pitt fans like to make fun of it but that hurt us too. At the end of the day that garbage Orange Bowl featured a bottom dwelling Big 12 team in terms of TV against one of the ACC blue bloods and best teams.