Mitt sets a new record!

Quote:The former Massachusetts governor won Delaware with 56 percent of the vote and Pennsylvania with 58 percent. According to University of Minnesota political scientist Eric Ostermeier, that marks the first time that a presumptive GOP nominee has failed to reach the 60 percent mark in a contest conducted after his last major challenger exited the race.

(emphasis added)


Certainly, Ron Paul's loyal base is a factor, but if you're that loyal to Paul and his ideals, are you gonna switch to Mitt after the convention? I think the point remains: If Romney can't differentiate himself more against GOP also rans in the primaries, he has a near zero chance on November 6.

(04-25-2012 03:49 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  Mitt sets a new record!

Quote:The former Massachusetts governor won Delaware with 56 percent of the vote and Pennsylvania with 58 percent. According to University of Minnesota political scientist Eric Ostermeier, that marks the first time that a presumptive GOP nominee has failed to reach the 60 percent mark in a contest conducted after his last major challenger exited the race.

(emphasis added)


Certainly, Ron Paul's loyal base is a factor, but if you're that loyal to Paul and his ideals, are you gonna switch to Mitt after the convention? I think the point remains: If Romney can't differentiate himself more against GOP also rans in the primaries, he has a near zero chance on November 6.

Yup. That's why Paul was the best chance for victory.

(04-25-2012 03:49 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  Certainly, Ron Paul's loyal base is a factor, but if you're that loyal to Paul and his ideals, are you gonna switch to Mitt after the convention?

Well, a Ron Paul loyalist will never vote for Obama, but will he let his -non-vote give Obama a second term?

I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

(04-25-2012 09:11 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

(04-25-2012 09:38 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:11 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

That's your inner neo-con projecting. At least try to be honest with yourself even if you can't be honest with others.

(04-25-2012 09:38 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:11 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

Yep.. There is not a dimes worth of difference in either gang.

I think Obama looks a little better in a suit, and I like overhearing old peoples discussions about whatever chain email they received this week. That's, well, that's about it.

(04-25-2012 09:55 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:38 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:11 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

That's your inner neo-con projecting. At least try to be honest with yourself even if you can't be honest with others.

Calling me a neo-con further illustrates your ignorance. You're the one who supports an anti-civil liberty, warmongering, Wall Street puppet - not me.

(04-26-2012 08:35 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:55 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:38 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:11 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

That's your inner neo-con projecting. At least try to be honest with yourself even if you can't be honest with others.

Calling me a neo-con further illustrates your ignorance. You're the one who supports an anti-civil liberty, warmongering, Wall Street puppet - not me.

I think it is funny that you don't even know what you stand for.

(04-26-2012 09:32 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 08:35 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:55 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:38 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:11 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

That's your inner neo-con projecting. At least try to be honest with yourself even if you can't be honest with others.

Calling me a neo-con further illustrates your ignorance. You're the one who supports an anti-civil liberty, warmongering, Wall Street puppet - not me.

I think it is funny that you don't even know what you stand for.

You'd think someone who can read others' minds wouldn't be mired in such a sad, crappy life.

(04-26-2012 09:32 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 08:35 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:55 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:38 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:11 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  I voted for Mitt in the primaries. His nomination means that we on the left win no matter who prevails in November.

Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

That's your inner neo-con projecting. At least try to be honest with yourself even if you can't be honest with others.

Calling me a neo-con further illustrates your ignorance. You're the one who supports an anti-civil liberty, warmongering, Wall Street puppet - not me.

I think it is funny that you don't even know what you stand for.

He knows exactly what he stands for - whatever is politically expedient at the moment.

(04-26-2012 09:40 AM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 09:32 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 08:35 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:55 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:38 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  Yep, the neo-libs can celebrate four more years of debt, war, cronyism, and less freedom regardless of who wins.

That's your inner neo-con projecting. At least try to be honest with yourself even if you can't be honest with others.

Calling me a neo-con further illustrates your ignorance. You're the one who supports an anti-civil liberty, warmongering, Wall Street puppet - not me.

I think it is funny that you don't even know what you stand for.

He knows exactly what he stands for - whatever is politically expedient at the moment.

Yep, that's why I'll be voting for Gary Johnson or Ron Paul, and you'll be voting for Bush III.

(04-26-2012 09:45 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 09:40 AM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 09:32 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 08:35 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-25-2012 09:55 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  That's your inner neo-con projecting. At least try to be honest with yourself even if you can't be honest with others.

Calling me a neo-con further illustrates your ignorance. You're the one who supports an anti-civil liberty, warmongering, Wall Street puppet - not me.

I think it is funny that you don't even know what you stand for.

He knows exactly what he stands for - whatever is politically expedient at the moment.

Yep, that's why I'll be voting for Gary Johnson or Ron Paul, and you'll be voting for Bush III.

And in your little, screwy UAB mind that rules out politcal expediency. You're a great representation of the lowly education offered there.

(04-26-2012 09:55 AM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 09:45 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 09:40 AM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 09:32 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(04-26-2012 08:35 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  Calling me a neo-con further illustrates your ignorance. You're the one who supports an anti-civil liberty, warmongering, Wall Street puppet - not me.

I think it is funny that you don't even know what you stand for.

He knows exactly what he stands for - whatever is politically expedient at the moment.

Yep, that's why I'll be voting for Gary Johnson or Ron Paul, and you'll be voting for Bush III.

And in your little, screwy UAB mind that rules out politcal expediency. You're a great representation of the lowly education offered there.

West Tennessee Normal School academic smack.

I am supporting the candidates that best represent my ideals, even though they have no chance of winning. That makes me principled. Meanwhile, you (a so-called liberal) are willing to support a fourth Bush term. That makes you the expedient one. You don't get to redefine words to fit your agenda.

More like congrat's Satan. I'm a true conserative, that's why I'll never vote for Romney and his Mormon cult agenda. I'd rather write in Ron Paul than slick Mitt.