Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Air Force
Author Message
k5james Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,911
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 97
I Root For: SDSU
Location: Yuma, AZ
Post: #61
RE: Air Force
(03-15-2012 11:40 PM)fresnostatebulldogfan Wrote:  I think AF would be willing to commit but perhaps they are wanting a travel partner... (I.E. Wyoming/ CSU)?

Wyoming is out of the question. CSU maye.
03-16-2012 02:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fresnostatebulldogfan Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 327
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Fresno State
Location:
Post: #62
RE: Air Force
(03-16-2012 12:31 AM)attackfrog Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 11:14 PM)SoCalValleyDog Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 02:44 PM)CougarRed Wrote:  This is not brain surgery. The pecking order is clear:

1. BYU
2. Air Force
3. Fresno

Nobody else matters, because if the first 2 decline, Fresno will accept.

In fact, if all 3 wanted to come, I'd go to 16 in a heartbeat.

Boeh has said almost the opposite on two different occasions. Not to say FS wont, but it does appear unlikely unless a more regional western div is created, and one that can house our Oly's as well.

Probably more of a face saving comment than anything else. Essentially, if invited into the Big East, Fresno would be looking at either playing in the WAC or Big West with it's other sports. The WAC is little different from the MW in travel and you cant get more regional than the Big West. If Fresno State has to choose between a $10-15 million a year pay day or a $2-3 million dollar annual pay day---I suspect we might see a change in attitude.

+10-15 Millon on that post... money will transform people's and college attitude in a quickness.
03-16-2012 02:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fresnostatebulldogfan Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 327
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Fresno State
Location:
Post: #63
RE: Air Force
(03-16-2012 02:01 AM)k5james Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 11:40 PM)fresnostatebulldogfan Wrote:  I think AF would be willing to commit but perhaps they are wanting a travel partner... (I.E. Wyoming/ CSU)?

Wyoming is out of the question. CSU maye.

I agree possibly CSU but I am not sure that is what BE would be willing to do to bring on AF? CSU's team is not been good it has improved and has put the money into investing in their program, but I am not sure they are a good add at this time???

What do you think about adding both AF and Fresno State. I know it does not do anything for AF "travel partner" but it will put them on notice as saying well if we reject the offer than BE will be happy with just Fresno State.
03-16-2012 02:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Brown Bull Offline
usf97
*

Posts: 2,839
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 94
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #64
RE: Air Force
The only way we see 2 western adds anytime soon is if A) Louisville leaves AND the BE decides the goal is still to go to 14, B) Villanova is given the green light to move up and a 16th team is needed.
03-16-2012 09:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
adcorbett Offline
This F'n Guy
*

Posts: 14,325
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 368
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Cybertron
Post: #65
RE: Air Force
(03-15-2012 10:40 AM)NJRedMan Wrote:  
(03-14-2012 09:12 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  Are we seriously having this discussion? Fresno State is not even in the se stratosphere as Air Force. ESPECIALLY not in a conference that ALSO includes navy. There is no debate to be had on this. Not even close. As a matter of fact, There is a reason AFA was ahead of SDSU on the list, and SDSU is well ahead of Fresno on this list.

Are you high? Fresno gas actually beaten BCS schools this last decade. CA is one of the premier HS recruiting grounds. I NEVER see people wearing AF apparel like I do with Army and Navy. Fresno is already a rival with SDSt and Boise. Fresno can actually compete and help repair the leagues FB image. Am I missing anything?

Oh Boise and SDSt would get a recruiting bump with Fresno in conference compared to AF.

I really wish people would stop looking at last night's box score before opening their mouth on expansion. Let me school you something young man, in the last 30 years Air Force has been to 19 bowl games, more than any other potential expansion team save for BYU during that time they have also had 5 ten win seasons, and were pretty close to playing for a national championship. Even in the last five years, their record has been better than SDSU, Fresno, etc.

Oh and for the "Fresno gas actually beaten BCS schools this last decade," I suppose Notre Dame, Utah, TCU, Washington, and Georgia Tech don’t count (I can add wins over California and two of NW just past five years), or field goal (or one possession losses) to Oklahoma, Utah, Minnesota, Tennessee, California, and TCU in the last five years , or beating the beloved Houston (multiple times), San Diego State (multiple times), and Navy (multiple times) all in the last five years don't count as "being able to compete?" A five year period that has actually been pretty down compared to Air Force standards of the last few decades. BTW, that is better than Fresno’s wins over teams with losing records (Cincinnati, Illinois x2, and UCLA), plus Rutgers and the same Georgia Tech team you left out. Considering this is about the only argument you made that may have had any merit, I think it more or less blew up on you.
And for that matter, you would be the one smoking that ****, if you seriously think adding Fresno State would "repair the leagues FB image." I mean are you just smoking herb, and or have you graduated on to smoking rocks? There are NO teams available that will help or hurt the leagues standing as a football conference, including BYU, because no matter what, the BE will be the sixth best conference. IT is not going up by adding anyone, nor is it going down by adding anyone. Which was why adding teams that help reapir the basketball image was actually a good idea, because being the most marketable asset of the Big East, putting your best foot forward there does more to help the ability of the next TV contract than adding Fresno, Hawaii, Colorado St, or anyone else.
03-16-2012 10:32 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Coog82 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 493
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 53
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #66
RE: Air Force
(03-16-2012 12:16 AM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 11:27 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  I doubt the BE have given it much more thought past AFA.

^ This.

And with Navy not coming in until 2015, we can afford to wait it out.. We're sitting in a very good spot. 12 is a good number for 2013 and 2014. A lot can happen in 2 years, with AFA and BYU (who already have a home for their Olympic sports).

Actually we can't afford to wait it out for a number of reasons. Yes, it is true that we don't have to have another team until 2015, but
1) The Networks are going to want to know who the 14th team is before contract negoiations start in September and
2) The new Alliance will not let a team camp out for a couple of years and then leave in 2015 for the Big East...and you are not going to be able to keep this a secret, and
3) The new Alliance is talking about tying everyone's TV rights up. Don't know if this would get off the ground, but if it did you would definitely have to announce the 14th member by June 30th.

I believe we will have Air Force by then or possibly Fresno, if Air Force declines. JMO.
03-16-2012 10:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BigEastHomer Offline
Banned

Posts: 11,730
Joined: Oct 2011
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #67
RE: Air Force
(03-16-2012 10:53 AM)Coog82 Wrote:  
(03-16-2012 12:16 AM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 11:27 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  I doubt the BE have given it much more thought past AFA.

^ This.

And with Navy not coming in until 2015, we can afford to wait it out.. We're sitting in a very good spot. 12 is a good number for 2013 and 2014. A lot can happen in 2 years, with AFA and BYU (who already have a home for their Olympic sports).

Actually we can't afford to wait it out for a number of reasons. Yes, it is true that we don't have to have another team until 2015, but
1) The Networks are going to want to know who the 14th team is before contract negoiations start in September and
2) The new Alliance will not let a team camp out for a couple of years and then leave in 2015 for the Big East...and you are not going to be able to keep this a secret, and
3) The new Alliance is talking about tying everyone's TV rights up. Don't know if this would get off the ground, but if it did you would definitely have to announce the 14th member by June 30th.

I believe we will have Air Force by then or possibly Fresno, if Air Force declines. JMO.

All good points.
03-16-2012 10:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fear The Frog Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 996
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 32
I Root For: TCU
Location:
Post: #68
RE: Air Force
(03-16-2012 10:53 AM)Coog82 Wrote:  
(03-16-2012 12:16 AM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 11:27 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  I doubt the BE have given it much more thought past AFA.

^ This.

And with Navy not coming in until 2015, we can afford to wait it out.. We're sitting in a very good spot. 12 is a good number for 2013 and 2014. A lot can happen in 2 years, with AFA and BYU (who already have a home for their Olympic sports).

Actually we can't afford to wait it out for a number of reasons. Yes, it is true that we don't have to have another team until 2015, but
1) The Networks are going to want to know who the 14th team is before contract negoiations start in September and
2) The new Alliance will not let a team camp out for a couple of years and then leave in 2015 for the Big East...and you are not going to be able to keep this a secret, and
3) The new Alliance is talking about tying everyone's TV rights up. Don't know if this would get off the ground, but if it did you would definitely have to announce the 14th member by June 30th.

I believe we will have Air Force by then or possibly Fresno, if Air Force declines. JMO.

That says it all right there...
03-16-2012 04:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lolly Popp Offline
Magically Delicious
*

Posts: 2,425
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 82
I Root For: Football
Location: Endzone
Post: #69
RE: Air Force
Exactly. It is better and simpler for everyone if the 14th gridiron member is decided by June. The Big East will simply have to operate with 13 football teams in 2013 and 2014. Not the end of the world as the MAC has been doing this for seven years.
03-16-2012 04:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cubanbull Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,617
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 392
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #70
RE: Air Force
And if the Alliance is really oing to get members to agree to those tv rights concessions then that could force Air Force to rethink its position.
03-16-2012 04:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CougarRed Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,449
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 429
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #71
RE: Air Force
The Alliance has a lot of work to do to finalize their membership before they can start asking for assignment of rights. They don't even know if they will be an 18, 20, 22 or 24 team league yet.
03-16-2012 04:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
IceJus10 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,152
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 90
I Root For: Sports
Location: New York
Post: #72
RE: Air Force
(03-15-2012 01:53 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  Remember.....the Big East was also salivating over the idea of adding Army......

and you are worried about AFA not being able to compete?

I know back before they joined CUSA, Army was mentioned once or twice with Navy as potential Big East members, but when recently have they been mentioned? -- I've only ever seen one/two people on here carrying that banner, never in any media source... got a link or something for that salivating claim? I've not seen any such reference or mention from the Conference membership.
(This post was last modified: 03-16-2012 06:14 PM by IceJus10.)
03-16-2012 06:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Brown Bull Offline
usf97
*

Posts: 2,839
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 94
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #73
RE: Air Force
(03-16-2012 06:12 PM)IceJus10 Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 01:53 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  Remember.....the Big East was also salivating over the idea of adding Army......

and you are worried about AFA not being able to compete?

I know back before they joined CUSA, Army was mentioned once or twice with Navy as potential Big East members, but when recently have they been mentioned? -- I've only ever seen one/two people on here carrying that banner, never in any media source... got a link or something for that salivating claim? I've not seen any such reference or mention from the Conference membership.

http://msn.foxsports.com/collegefootball...ate-102611

The addition of the six new members would give the Big East 11 football-playing members, leaving the 12th spot open. A source said that once Air Force and Navy are in, the league will try hard to lure Army.

http://www.denverpost.com/sports/ci_19073868

Air Force and Navy have negotiated extensively to ensure they move together to the Big East, and gone so far as to lobby Army to join them as football partners in the league.

Mueh insisted: "The Big East wants Army. Absolutely." The Black Knights, however, have concerns their program might not be ready for the rigors of playing West Virginia and other top teams in the Big East on a regular basis.
03-16-2012 09:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,823
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2880
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #74
RE: Air Force
(03-16-2012 09:27 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  
(03-16-2012 06:12 PM)IceJus10 Wrote:  
(03-15-2012 01:53 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  Remember.....the Big East was also salivating over the idea of adding Army......

and you are worried about AFA not being able to compete?

I know back before they joined CUSA, Army was mentioned once or twice with Navy as potential Big East members, but when recently have they been mentioned? -- I've only ever seen one/two people on here carrying that banner, never in any media source... got a link or something for that salivating claim? I've not seen any such reference or mention from the Conference membership.

http://msn.foxsports.com/collegefootball...ate-102611

The addition of the six new members would give the Big East 11 football-playing members, leaving the 12th spot open. A source said that once Air Force and Navy are in, the league will try hard to lure Army.

http://www.denverpost.com/sports/ci_19073868

Air Force and Navy have negotiated extensively to ensure they move together to the Big East, and gone so far as to lobby Army to join them as football partners in the league.

Mueh insisted: "The Big East wants Army. Absolutely." The Black Knights, however, have concerns their program might not be ready for the rigors of playing West Virginia and other top teams in the Big East on a regular basis.

While I am very proud of the men and women in the service, I have to say Army would be an awful addition. Im pretty sure even Army understands this. There is a reason they left CUSA. Its not helpful for Army recruting or image to have your football team get whipped every week. Army is much better off in thier current situation. There are much better possible additions available for the Big East.
03-16-2012 09:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.