mjs
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21,639
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
|
Charlie Creme's updated bracket
Little Rock
6St. Bonaventure
11UTEP
3DELAWARE
14UALR
I'd take that in a second. He also has the Lady Pigs as a 6 seed vs. Gonzaga in Spokane. Don't see why they wouldn't send them here as a 6 seed. That could get really interesting.
|
|
03-06-2012 09:21 PM |
|
PTJR
Heisman
Posts: 6,206
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LR / UR / CU
Location: Little Rock
|
RE: Charlie Creme's updated bracket
(03-06-2012 09:21 PM)mjs Wrote: Little Rock
6St. Bonaventure
11UTEP
3DELAWARE
14UALR
I'd take that in a second. He also has the Lady Pigs as a 6 seed vs. Gonzaga in Spokane. Don't see why they wouldn't send them here as a 6 seed. That could get really interesting.
The NCAA would never pass up a chance to generate excitement like this guy is missing out on. If one can accept his seeding, ie- a 14 for UALR and a 6 for the Chickenhawgs, expect the Chickenhawgs in Little Rock. Of course, that seeding has to be correct for this premise to stand.
|
|
03-06-2012 09:39 PM |
|
mjs
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21,639
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
|
RE: Charlie Creme's updated bracket
(03-06-2012 09:39 PM)PTJR Wrote: (03-06-2012 09:21 PM)mjs Wrote: Little Rock
6St. Bonaventure
11UTEP
3DELAWARE
14UALR
I'd take that in a second. He also has the Lady Pigs as a 6 seed vs. Gonzaga in Spokane. Don't see why they wouldn't send them here as a 6 seed. That could get really interesting.
The NCAA would never pass up a chance to generate excitement like this guy is missing out on. If one can accept his seeding, ie- a 14 for UALR and a 6 for the Chickenhawgs, expect the Chickenhawgs in Little Rock. Of course, that seeding has to be correct for this premise to stand.
Obviously this guy has no idea where teams will be sent. I also doubt he knows anything about the medieval policies at UAF. Whether or not NCAA cares is another matter. But it would seem like they would have no problem placing the higher seed (UAF) close to home and filling the arena in Little Rock. I do believe Mr. Creme follows women's basketball enough that his seeding predictions are in the ball park- Thus, us at a 14, UAF as a 6, is probably within a seed of where the NCAA will put these 2 teams.
|
|
03-06-2012 09:46 PM |
|
PTJR
Heisman
Posts: 6,206
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LR / UR / CU
Location: Little Rock
|
RE: Charlie Creme's updated bracket
(03-06-2012 09:46 PM)mjs Wrote: (03-06-2012 09:39 PM)PTJR Wrote: (03-06-2012 09:21 PM)mjs Wrote: Little Rock
6St. Bonaventure
11UTEP
3DELAWARE
14UALR
I'd take that in a second. He also has the Lady Pigs as a 6 seed vs. Gonzaga in Spokane. Don't see why they wouldn't send them here as a 6 seed. That could get really interesting.
The NCAA would never pass up a chance to generate excitement like this guy is missing out on. If one can accept his seeding, ie- a 14 for UALR and a 6 for the Chickenhawgs, expect the Chickenhawgs in Little Rock. Of course, that seeding has to be correct for this premise to stand.
Obviously this guy has no idea where teams will be sent. I also doubt he knows anything about the medieval policies at UAF. Whether or not NCAA cares is another matter. But it would seem like they would have no problem placing the higher seed (UAF) close to home and filling the arena in Little Rock. I do believe Mr. Creme follows women's basketball enough that his seeding predictions are in the ball park- Thus, us at a 14, UAF as a 6, is probably within a seed of where the NCAA will put these 2 teams.
I don't know that the NCAA knows or cares about the medieval policy, but my guess is someone in that organization knows and sees the opportunity. What they do know and care about for sure though is selling tickets and creating excitment for the women's tournament. If the seedings work out, putting the Chickenhawgs in Little Rock for that reason is a no brainer!
|
|
03-06-2012 09:54 PM |
|