Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
MWC Ready to Pounce?
Author Message
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,689
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1331
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #1
 
MWC considering expansion......<a href='http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=302' target='_blank'>MWC Commish says expansion possible in a few years</a>
05-02-2005 02:26 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


Brick City Pirate Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,790
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 42
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #2
 
With all of the Big East expansion rumors that have floated around, I seem to remember one on the rumors revolving around the Big East adding 2 schools. I think the rumor came from a poster on a Louisville board.
05-02-2005 02:43 PM
Find all posts by this user
SF Husky Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,338
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 295
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
Post: #3
 
TexanMark Wrote:MWC considering expansion......<a href='http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=302' target='_blank'>MWC Commish says expansion possible in a few years</a>
If MWC wants to look good in front of the BCS, they should add 3 more schools and go to 12. I think adding Boise, Fresno and Hawaii would do the trick. That would be a pretty decent lineup.

As for the BE, there just aren't many programs that have good FB teams like Fresno and Boise left as candidates from expansion. If ECU, UCF and Memphis improve their FB schools in a big way, things might change.
05-02-2005 02:55 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
gimpdog12 Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 7
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #4
 
Unfortunately, if the MWC adds Fresno, Boise, and someone else, they would be a better FB conference then anything the BE could muster assuming Penn State or ND don't switch over, which won't happen.

Let's hope this doesn;'t occur!
05-02-2005 03:48 PM
Find all posts by this user
omniorange Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,144
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:

Donators
Post: #5
 
Quote:SF Husky Posted on May 2 2005, 03:01 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote: (TexanMark @ May 2 2005, 02:32 PM)
MWC considering expansion......MWC Commish says expansion possible in a few years&nbsp;


If MWC wants to look good in front of the BCS, they should add 3 more schools and go to 12. I think adding Boise, Fresno and Hawaii would do the trick. That would be a pretty decent lineup.

Agreed. And Boise and Fresno should definitely be two of the three schools. I suspect either UTEP or Houston would be the other. That would give the MW some decent, if not the greatest, travel partners:

Utah-BYU
Colorado State-Air Force
Fresno State-San Diego State
Boise State-Wyoming
UNLV-New Mexico
TCU-UTEP/Houston

Houston gives them the potential larger market share (#11) to add to #7 Dallas-Ft. Worth, #18 Denver, #26 San Diego, #36 Salt Lake City, and #51 Las Vegas, but it doesn't give them enough of a boost in overall conference strength that including UTEP's #37 finish last year (with Boise's #9 and Fresno's #33) would do. Taking UTEP, Boise, and Fresno gets the MW up to an overall BCS average of 53.8. And also gives them two Top 10 finishers. Of course those two Top 10 finishes are also their only Top 25 teams (out of 12, which is only 16.6%), but I bet they could make a case for an auto-berth with that 12 team configuration.

I suspect that is why Weiberg said the new criteria could result in anywhere from 5-7 auto-berth conferences. The 5 super-conferences will definitely meet the criteria, and both the BE and MW have the ability to attain it. The BE as currently constituted and the MW with expansion including Boise and Fresno.


Quote: As for the BE, there just aren't many programs that have good FB teams like Fresno and Boise left as candidates from expansion. If ECU, UCF and Memphis improve their FB schools in a big way, things might change.


Actually, Memphis and their #34 ranking would actually improve the 2004 numbers of the Big East. They also add the #44 market, have great basketball and bring with them a nice Bowl tie-in.

Still there is resistence to taking the Tigers that I don't quite understand. ECU's or UCF's numbers would kill us, but I'm sure the #20 Orlando-Daytona market is appealing for some. That plus a possible travel partner for USF, seems to make them a front-runner for #9.

In any case, all of the potential new members need to aim for doing well in 2006 and 2007 because I believe those years will determine who gets a BABE invite or not for 2010. And if none of them do well, expect a renewal of the 16-team confederation for another 5 years after 2010.

Cheers,
Neil
05-02-2005 04:22 PM
Find all posts by this user
BullsFanatic Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,650
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 26
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #6
 
Of course, it isn't just market size...it's also fan support and travel to bowls. That would add ECU and Marshall to the mix. Market size helps Memphis, UCF, and Temple. I think we are down to those five schools, barring an upgrade from a good 1AA. The others (Army, Navy etc.) just aren't interested.
05-02-2005 04:29 PM
Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


cuseroc Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 15,281
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 549
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: Rochester/Sarasota

Donators
Post: #7
 
SF Husky Wrote:
TexanMark Wrote:MWC considering expansion......<a href='http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=302' target='_blank'>MWC Commish says expansion possible in a few years</a>
If MWC wants to look good in front of the BCS, they should add 3 more schools and go to 12. I think adding Boise, Fresno and Hawaii would do the trick. That would be a pretty decent lineup.

As for the BE, there just aren't many programs that have good FB teams like Fresno and Boise left as candidates from expansion. If ECU, UCF and Memphis improve their FB schools in a big way, things might change.
I think any one or 2 of these programs could come close: Bowling Green, Toledo, Miami OH. At least one of these teams are always in the top 25. Many times a couple of them are ranked. They are always very competitive.
05-02-2005 05:06 PM
Find all posts by this user
Cat's_Claw Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,606
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #8
 
gimpdog12 Wrote:Unfortunately, if the MWC adds Fresno, Boise, and someone else, they would be a better FB conference then anything the BE could muster assuming Penn State or ND don't switch over, which won't happen.

Let's hope this doesn;'t occur!
Don't be so sure. Schools like UConn, South Florida and Cincinnati could rise up and be Top 25 caliber programs with a few years of BCS recruiting.
05-02-2005 05:13 PM
Find all posts by this user
wvucrazed Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,363
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 179
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post: #9
 
cuseroc Wrote:
SF Husky Wrote:
TexanMark Wrote:MWC considering expansion......<a href='http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=302' target='_blank'>MWC Commish says expansion possible in a few years</a>
If MWC wants to look good in front of the BCS, they should add 3 more schools and go to 12. I think adding Boise, Fresno and Hawaii would do the trick. That would be a pretty decent lineup.

As for the BE, there just aren't many programs that have good FB teams like Fresno and Boise left as candidates from expansion. If ECU, UCF and Memphis improve their FB schools in a big way, things might change.
I think any one or 2 of these programs could come close: Bowling Green, Toledo, Miami OH. At least one of these teams are always in the top 25. Many times a couple of them are ranked. They are always very competitive.
I honestly don't see us ever adding a MAC school. The best program in the MAC as a total package would probably be Northern Illinois, and they don't make sense geographically.

The problem w/ any MAC school is that it will be considered mid-major regardless of a jump to the BE. The MAC has a mid-major perception - when you think mid-major in football, you think the MAC - and I don't think any of its member institutions would be able to escape that label. It would hurt the BE in perception far more than it would ever help us.
05-02-2005 07:15 PM
Find all posts by this user
wvucrazed Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,363
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 179
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post: #10
 
Cat's_Claw Wrote:
gimpdog12 Wrote:Unfortunately, if the MWC adds Fresno, Boise, and someone else, they would be a better FB conference then anything the BE could muster assuming Penn State or ND don't switch over, which won't happen.

Let's hope this doesn;'t occur!
Don't be so sure. Schools like UConn, South Florida and Cincinnati could rise up and be Top 25 caliber programs with a few years of BCS recruiting.
I agree, even with Boise and/or Fresno, the MWC simply does not match up w/ the BE.
05-02-2005 07:15 PM
Find all posts by this user
zelinleaf Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 918
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #11
 
omnicarrier Wrote:Agreed. And Boise and Fresno should definitely be two of the three schools. I suspect either UTEP or Houston would be the other. That would give the MW some decent, if not the greatest, travel partners:

Utah-BYU
Colorado State-Air Force
Fresno State-San Diego State
Boise State-Wyoming
UNLV-New Mexico
TCU-UTEP/Houston
Houston's not exactly west of the mountain now, is it? 03-wink But yeah, that 12 team line-up with Boise, Fresno, and UTEP seems to make the most sense. I wonder if there were any clause for the new CUSA members when they sign on prohibiting them from leaving for another conference in a said period of time?
05-02-2005 10:19 PM
Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


Jackson1011 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 170
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #12
 
Quote:I agree, even with Boise and/or Fresno, the MWC simply does not match up w/ the BE.



-- I don't know....a league of :

Utah-BYU
Colorado State-Air Force
Fresno State-San Diego State
Boise State-Wyoming
UNLV-New Mexico
TCU-UTEP/Houston

... as some good talent and is deeper in terms of quality than we are....the BE would need a couple more teams to develop and make another solid expansion choice or two to compete


Jackson
05-02-2005 10:49 PM
Find all posts by this user
Wilkie01 Offline
Cards Prognosticater
Jersey Retired

Posts: 26,753
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 1072
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Planet Red
Post: #13
 
We would have to add Memphis, ECU, Southern Miss and Central Florida.
05-02-2005 10:54 PM
Find all posts by this user
Jackson1011 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 170
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #14
 
I don't know if our BCS ranking could handle the additons of ECU and UCF at the same time....I know both programs can succeed given certain circumstances but let's face facts....both haven't been too good recently and would certainly bring down our confernce ranking....especially if the MWC is adding quality like Fresno and Boist St...I think we would be in a tough spot if the MWC pulled this off


Jackson
05-02-2005 11:06 PM
Find all posts by this user
omniorange Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,144
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:

Donators
Post: #15
 
Quote:Jackson1011 Posted on May 2 2005, 11:12 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know if our BCS ranking could handle the additons of ECU and UCF at the same time....I know both programs can succeed given certain circumstances but let's face facts....both haven't been too good recently and would certainly bring down our confernce ranking....especially if the MWC is adding quality like Fresno and Boist St...I think we would be in a tough spot if the MWC pulled this off

Agreed. Our overall BCS average for 2004 would plummet from an already inflated 48.25 to 58.58 by adding Memphis, So. Miss., ECU, and UCF.

In the meantime, if MW were to add Fresno, Boise, and UTEP theirs goes up to 53.8 from a current adjusted (for TCU) 63.0.

Definitely not a good trade-off.

Memphis alone brings us up to an even more inflated 46.6 - but it would help our overall 4-yr average with an expected decline in that number once we no longer have Temple to beat up on (and have the luxury of not counting Temple's ranking). That's quite a gift from the BCS.

Cheers,
Neil
05-02-2005 11:13 PM
Find all posts by this user
Jackson1011 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 7,864
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 170
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #16
 
If the MWC adds Fresno, Boise and Utep...then perhaps the BE would have to look at schools not normially mentioned when it comes to expansion....Assuming ECU and UCF do not improve....I think Memphis and Southern Miss would be locks but then names like Marshall, Bowling Green and Miami of OH would have to get a look too...I know bball would suffer if those candiates (other then Memphis) were choosen but it seems the all important conference football ranking is going to be our #1 priority



Jackson
05-02-2005 11:39 PM
Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


USFMike Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,835
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 26
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #17
 
i don't think expansion is the answer, the big east needs to establish the teams it already has and then expand to 9 if the split occurs. if we win our out of conference games, win our bowls, gain some recognition, and average 2-3 teams in the top 25 our bid will be safe. don't get me wrong boise state and fresno state are good and i've respect what they've done but their records are inflated being from the wac. mountain west may get the seventh spot if they get those two teams but i doubt they take the big east's spot.
05-02-2005 11:53 PM
Find all posts by this user
omniorange Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,144
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:

Donators
Post: #18
 
Quote:USFMike Posted on May 2 2005, 11:59 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i don't think expansion is the answer, the big east needs to establish the teams it already has and then expand to 9 if the split occurs. if we win our out of conference games, win our bowls, gain some recognition, and average 2-3 teams in the top 25 our bid will be safe. don't get me wrong boise state and fresno state are good and i've respect what they've done but their records are inflated being from the wac. mountain west may get the seventh spot if they get those two teams but i doubt they take the big east's spot.&nbsp;

Agree 1000 %. 04-rock

Cheers,
Neil
05-02-2005 11:55 PM
Find all posts by this user
knight_01 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,407
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 1
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #19
 
nm
05-02-2005 11:58 PM
Find all posts by this user
billings Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,329
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 44
I Root For: Wyo / Mont St.
Location: Billings, Montana
Post: #20
 
USFMike Wrote:i don't think expansion is the answer, the big east needs to establish the teams it already has and then expand to 9 if the split occurs. if we win our out of conference games, win our bowls, gain some recognition, and average 2-3 teams in the top 25 our bid will be safe. don't get me wrong boise state and fresno state are good and i've respect what they've done but their records are inflated being from the wac. mountain west may get the seventh spot if they get those two teams but i doubt they take the big east's spot.
Ignore the man behind the curtain. ..... no footbal is played west of the mississippi..... nothingi s going on out here at all.... steady as she goes.
05-03-2005 12:12 AM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.