(02-09-2011 12:41 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (02-08-2011 03:56 PM)bitcruncher Wrote: quo, the conference name is irrelevant. If the football schools decide to go their own way, the value of the Big East name drops considerably. Without the football schools, the non-football schools would be greatly diminished...
Remember, it's basketball that gives the Big East name positive value, not football. It's basketball that established the "Big East" name as a respectable one. If anything, the football side gains some benefits from the reflected glory of the basketball side. As a football conference we get dragged through the media mud all the time. So to the extent that the non-football schools would suffer, it wouldn't be from no longer associating with the football programs of the FBS schools, but their basketball programs.
And there is some value in the name, which is why conferences like the Big10 don't change theirs. Sure, those schools could re-name the conference and it would still be valuable, but their reluctance to change the name shows that they believe that value inheres in the name too.
A split that results in the basketball-only schools keeping the Big East name would, IMO, have the following immediate short-run ramifications:
a) both of the new conferences would be weaker in basketball, because there are good basketball programs on both the basketball-only and football sides of the current Big East conference.
b) the football-only schools would be weaker in football, because they'd lose the identity of the Big East brand, and would no longer have as powerful of a basketball side to prop them up.
Of course no one knows what will happen in the long run. I happen to think that a split that creates an all-sports conference consisting of the current FBS football schools will make those schools, like USF, and that new conference that goes in that direction, stronger. But it's by no means a sure thing.
Say the non-football schools keep the Big East name, and the football schools choose The BEast, which is very similar, except in the spelling. The name isn't going to win championships. The teams will...
Also, I guess you missed the part where I talked about how Virginia Tech changing their name from Virginia Polytechnic Institute eventually changed media perceptions about the school and led to their rise as the media darling in the east. The name is just a label. It's what's behind the label that counts, and if one of us happens to make the BCS Championship and win it, it won't matter one bit what the conference name may be for our representative. Winning solves any and all problems...
Syracuse, Pitt, WVU, UConn, UC, and UofL would still command respect, since all have been historically strong basketball programs. We would not be weaker. That's 6 strong basketball programs for an 8 (
soon to be 9) team conference, and most years all 6 will be in the NCAA tourney. That's 66.666% of the conference (
9 members - 75% with 8), which is about equal to us putting 11 teams into the NCAA tourney out of a 16 team conference, which we haven't done yet (
although that may soon change). I don't see any weakness there...
The non-football schools; Georgetown, Villanova, ND, and Marquette have been historically strong, with very few bad seasons among those 4 teams of late. St. John's is trying to return to their former glory. But their level of success could knock one of the previous 4 non-football schools from their perch among the better teams. The mediocre trio (
Providence, Seton Hall, and DePaul) have probably all seen their best days already, and have little to look forward to. DePaul could return to their former glory. But I just don't see it happening...
However, without BCS affiliation, and the rivalries presented by the presence of the football schools who maintain a high level of basketball strength, the non-football schools will have a tough time maintaining their present level of success, for the most part. Their income and prestige would take a huge hit without the football schools, and over time the disparity in funds will only widen the gap between the football schools and the non-football schools...
So a split, accompanied by a name change, would not hurt us in the least, as long as we take care of business on the field. But it would severely damage the non-football schools efforts to maintain pace in the long term...