Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
mjs Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,591
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #1
Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
DeAndre and Chuckie are both quick, athletic, can handle the ball, and can shoot. Not much more you can ask for- other than their being 6-3 or 6-4. The kid I saw last week, Reggie Fondren, is a legite 6-2 or 6-3 and will be a good addition next season. I don't have a problem with DeAndre and Chuckie splitting time at the point with one of them moving to the 2 guard occassionally. Our guard rotation seems pretty solid with those two and Solo. I said before the season that Matt would get 15-20 minutes off the bunch and that's about where he is. He may lose some of those minutes if Chucky keeps improving, but I still think he'll be a factor off the bench before its all said and done..
11-21-2010 07:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


outsideualr Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,770
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 12
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
(11-21-2010 07:12 PM)mjs Wrote:  DeAndre and Chuckie are both quick, athletic, can handle the ball, and can shoot. Not much more you can ask for- other than their being 6-3 or 6-4. The kid I saw last week, Reggie Fondren, is a legite 6-2 or 6-3 and will be a good addition next season. I don't have a problem with DeAndre and Chuckie splitting time at the point with one of them moving to the 2 guard occassionally. Our guard rotation seems pretty solid with those two and Solo. I said before the season that Matt would get 15-20 minutes off the bunch and that's about where he is. He may lose some of those minutes if Chucky keeps improving, but I still think he'll be a factor off the bench before its all said and done..

Not if he plays 13 minute and gets 5 shots. You know as well as I do that shooters need a lot of shots. How would Chas do with 5 shots a night? It's just stupid. I don't care how good the other guards are, on a consistent basis, not can hold a candle shooting to Matt. Granted Chucky made some shots tonight and Solo has had games where he hit some shots, but in others Solo has gone "0 for". But it's always been LRTrojan and I who have see the potential in Matt that isn't being utilized regularly. Everyone else has always pointed out his shortcomings, which aren't many. But what will be will be and as long as Steve is calling the shots, Solo will play 30 or more minutes a game, and Matt will sit on the bench waiting for them to throw him a bone. Pitiful.03-banghead
11-21-2010 07:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
LRTrojan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,477
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 19
I Root For: UALR Trojans
Location: Sherwood
Post: #3
RE: Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
(11-21-2010 07:18 PM)outsideualr Wrote:  
(11-21-2010 07:12 PM)mjs Wrote:  DeAndre and Chuckie are both quick, athletic, can handle the ball, and can shoot. Not much more you can ask for- other than their being 6-3 or 6-4. The kid I saw last week, Reggie Fondren, is a legite 6-2 or 6-3 and will be a good addition next season. I don't have a problem with DeAndre and Chuckie splitting time at the point with one of them moving to the 2 guard occassionally. Our guard rotation seems pretty solid with those two and Solo. I said before the season that Matt would get 15-20 minutes off the bunch and that's about where he is. He may lose some of those minutes if Chucky keeps improving, but I still think he'll be a factor off the bench before its all said and done..

Not if he plays 13 minute and gets 5 shots. You know as well as I do that shooters need a lot of shots. How would Chas do with 5 shots a night? It's just stupid. I don't care how good the other guards are, on a consistent basis, not can hold a candle shooting to Matt. Granted Chucky made some shots tonight and Solo has had games where he hit some shots, but in others Solo has gone "0 for". But it's always been LRTrojan and I who have see the potential in Matt that isn't being utilized regularly. Everyone else has always pointed out his shortcomings, which aren't many. But what will be will be and as long as Steve is calling the shots, Solo will play 30 or more minutes a game, and Matt will sit on the bench waiting for them to throw him a bone. Pitiful.03-banghead


I call myself watching a player on both sides of the ball. I personally don't see a lot of difference in Solo and Matt. Solo is quicker, but I think Matt makes up for some of that with his savvy as a kid that's been a student of the game, since he may not have the God given ability as a lot of kids have. Both are good free throw shooters. Matt is the better perimeter shooter in my opinion. I don't see a lot of difference in their defense. I've never thought Solo is as great as some of these on this board do. I think he's an average player at best, and not close to being an All-Conference player. And Matt is an average player. Both have things they can do that help the team. Neither could start for a decent Western Kentucky team. That's why we can't win conference tournaments.
11-21-2010 07:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MICHAELSPAPPY Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,788
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 33
I Root For: CHI ST, CROWLEY, TEX WES
Location: Booneville, Arkansas
Post: #4
RE: Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
(11-21-2010 07:12 PM)mjs Wrote:  I still think he'll be a factor off the bench before its all said and done..

He'll always be a factor until we get another proven 3-point shooter. But as our guard talent improves, his minutes may decrease some.
11-21-2010 08:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


mjs Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,591
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 59
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
(11-21-2010 07:18 PM)outsideualr Wrote:  
(11-21-2010 07:12 PM)mjs Wrote:  DeAndre and Chuckie are both quick, athletic, can handle the ball, and can shoot. Not much more you can ask for- other than their being 6-3 or 6-4. The kid I saw last week, Reggie Fondren, is a legite 6-2 or 6-3 and will be a good addition next season. I don't have a problem with DeAndre and Chuckie splitting time at the point with one of them moving to the 2 guard occassionally. Our guard rotation seems pretty solid with those two and Solo. I said before the season that Matt would get 15-20 minutes off the bunch and that's about where he is. He may lose some of those minutes if Chucky keeps improving, but I still think he'll be a factor off the bench before its all said and done..

Not if he plays 13 minute and gets 5 shots. You know as well as I do that shooters need a lot of shots. How would Chas do with 5 shots a night? It's just stupid. I don't care how good the other guards are, on a consistent basis, not can hold a candle shooting to Matt. Granted Chucky made some shots tonight and Solo has had games where he hit some shots, but in others Solo has gone "0 for". But it's always been LRTrojan and I who have see the potential in Matt that isn't being utilized regularly. Everyone else has always pointed out his shortcomings, which aren't many. But what will be will be and as long as Steve is calling the shots, Solo will play 30 or more minutes a game, and Matt will sit on the bench waiting for them to throw him a bone. Pitiful.03-banghead

Only one poster thinks Matt is an All-Conference player. LRTrojan seems a lot more equivocal about Matt's talent level. Everyone likes Matt. We all think he is a good player. We're thrilled he came to UALR. We appreciate all he's done. I just don't think there's a conspiracy against him playing more minutes. In fact, only one player has averaged considerably more minutes than he has. I also believe, all things being equal, Steve would play him more than other players for a number of reasons- he's local, he's a great story, he's a fan favorite, and (I don't know how to say this in a politically correct manner) he's white. And I don't at all buy the argument that his former walk-on status is held against him. He was a recruited walkon, he didn't just drop down on our campus and he is now a scholarship player no different than anyone else.
11-22-2010 12:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
insideualr Offline
Lord of the Trojans
*

Posts: 8,566
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UALR
Location: The Rock
Post: #6
RE: Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
(11-22-2010 12:26 AM)mjs Wrote:  
(11-21-2010 07:18 PM)outsideualr Wrote:  
(11-21-2010 07:12 PM)mjs Wrote:  DeAndre and Chuckie are both quick, athletic, can handle the ball, and can shoot. Not much more you can ask for- other than their being 6-3 or 6-4. The kid I saw last week, Reggie Fondren, is a legite 6-2 or 6-3 and will be a good addition next season. I don't have a problem with DeAndre and Chuckie splitting time at the point with one of them moving to the 2 guard occassionally. Our guard rotation seems pretty solid with those two and Solo. I said before the season that Matt would get 15-20 minutes off the bunch and that's about where he is. He may lose some of those minutes if Chucky keeps improving, but I still think he'll be a factor off the bench before its all said and done..

Not if he plays 13 minute and gets 5 shots. You know as well as I do that shooters need a lot of shots. How would Chas do with 5 shots a night? It's just stupid. I don't care how good the other guards are, on a consistent basis, not can hold a candle shooting to Matt. Granted Chucky made some shots tonight and Solo has had games where he hit some shots, but in others Solo has gone "0 for". But it's always been LRTrojan and I who have see the potential in Matt that isn't being utilized regularly. Everyone else has always pointed out his shortcomings, which aren't many. But what will be will be and as long as Steve is calling the shots, Solo will play 30 or more minutes a game, and Matt will sit on the bench waiting for them to throw him a bone. Pitiful.03-banghead

Only one poster thinks Matt is an All-Conference player. LRTrojan seems a lot more equivocal about Matt's talent level. Everyone likes Matt. We all think he is a good player. We're thrilled he came to UALR. We appreciate all he's done. I just don't think there's a conspiracy against him playing more minutes. In fact, only one player has averaged considerably more minutes than he has. I also believe, all things being equal, Steve would play him more than other players for a number of reasons- he's local, he's a great story, he's a fan favorite, and (I don't know how to say this in a politically correct manner) he's white. And I don't at all buy the argument that his former walk-on status is held against him. He was a recruited walkon, he didn't just drop down on our campus and he is now a scholarship player no different than anyone else.

+1

We all like the kid but he is no Freeman.
11-22-2010 07:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MICHAELSPAPPY Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,788
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 33
I Root For: CHI ST, CROWLEY, TEX WES
Location: Booneville, Arkansas
Post: #7
RE: Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
Matt is the type of player who will always help a team, because he has good basketball instincts and can shoot very well. However, there may be other good shooters who can run faster and jump higher. A good-shooting senior is going to get his chances.
11-22-2010 08:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
outsideualr Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,770
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 12
I Root For: UALR
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Looks like we got the athletic guard we've been wanting
(11-22-2010 12:26 AM)mjs Wrote:  
(11-21-2010 07:18 PM)outsideualr Wrote:  
(11-21-2010 07:12 PM)mjs Wrote:  DeAndre and Chuckie are both quick, athletic, can handle the ball, and can shoot. Not much more you can ask for- other than their being 6-3 or 6-4. The kid I saw last week, Reggie Fondren, is a legite 6-2 or 6-3 and will be a good addition next season. I don't have a problem with DeAndre and Chuckie splitting time at the point with one of them moving to the 2 guard occassionally. Our guard rotation seems pretty solid with those two and Solo. I said before the season that Matt would get 15-20 minutes off the bunch and that's about where he is. He may lose some of those minutes if Chucky keeps improving, but I still think he'll be a factor off the bench before its all said and done..

Not if he plays 13 minute and gets 5 shots. You know as well as I do that shooters need a lot of shots. How would Chas do with 5 shots a night? It's just stupid. I don't care how good the other guards are, on a consistent basis, not can hold a candle shooting to Matt. Granted Chucky made some shots tonight and Solo has had games where he hit some shots, but in others Solo has gone "0 for". But it's always been LRTrojan and I who have see the potential in Matt that isn't being utilized regularly. Everyone else has always pointed out his shortcomings, which aren't many. But what will be will be and as long as Steve is calling the shots, Solo will play 30 or more minutes a game, and Matt will sit on the bench waiting for them to throw him a bone. Pitiful.03-banghead

Only one poster thinks Matt is an All-Conference player. LRTrojan seems a lot more equivocal about Matt's talent level. Everyone likes Matt. We all think he is a good player. We're thrilled he came to UALR. We appreciate all he's done. I just don't think there's a conspiracy against him playing more minutes. In fact, only one player has averaged considerably more minutes than he has. I also believe, all things being equal, Steve would play him more than other players for a number of reasons- he's local, he's a great story, he's a fan favorite, and (I don't know how to say this in a politically correct manner) he's white. And I don't at all buy the argument that his former walk-on status is held against him. He was a recruited walkon, he didn't just drop down on our campus and he is now a scholarship player no different than anyone else.

I can't say who is or who isn't an all conference player. That's not my job to determine. I only want to see this kid get the playing time he has earned (not deserved, earned) over the past three seasons.

Now in defense of the coaches, we have to remember he was out for months with his broken foot, and it hasn't been too long since he was cleared for playing, so his conditioning can't be 100% yet. They see him in practice every day, and it could be his conditioning is more responsible for his reduced playing time then his abilities.

Any way, this is just something to talk about. If we weren't talking about Matt, we'd be talking about something else or someone else.
I'm just happy we've gotten some wins over some good opponents, and our new players are looking like we've recruited well. So life is good.
Beat ORU and La Tech!
11-22-2010 09:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.