Scores from games of "potential candidates" (based on recent reports) from the week of 11/6:

TCU 47 Utah 7
Navy 76 ECU 35--? but Navy isn't competitive according to so many visitors here
UCF 40 Houston 33
Marshall 31 UAB17
Villanova 14 URI 17
Tennessee 47 Memphis 7 3rd qtr score
Air Force 42 Army 22
Temple 28 Kent 10

If UCF gets ranked (in the BCS top 25) and since TCU is already ranked - if they were to join the BE in the off season would their rankings benefit the Big East's BCS point system? Even if these rankings occur before joining the Big East?

(11-06-2010 10:16 PM)UCFL Wrote:  If UCF gets ranked (in the BCS top 25) and since TCU is already ranked - if they were to join the BE in the off season would their rankings benefit the Big East's BCS point system? Even if these rankings occur before joining the Big East?

Only IF the BCS keeps the same criteria for the next contract. I would say the Big East offering Nova an invite would likely mean the conference has reason to believe it's AQ bid is not in jeopardy.

Cheers,
Neil

(11-06-2010 09:47 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  Scores from games of "potential candidates" (based on recent reports) from the week of 11/6:

TCU 47 Utah 7
Navy 76 ECU 35--? but Navy isn't competitive according to so many visitors here
UCF 40 Houston 33
Marshall 31 UAB17
Villanova 14 URI 17
Tennessee 47 Memphis 7 3rd qtr score
Air Force 42 Army 22
Temple 28 Kent 10

Holy Cow! Navy put up 76 on ECU? You sure that wasnt a basketball exhibition game?.....lol. WOW. I would love to see Navy join us. To bad that would never happen.

(11-06-2010 10:23 PM)WVUeer Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 09:47 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  Scores from games of "potential candidates" (based on recent reports) from the week of 11/6:

TCU 47 Utah 7
Navy 76 ECU 35--? but Navy isn't competitive according to so many visitors here
UCF 40 Houston 33
Marshall 31 UAB17
Villanova 14 URI 17
Tennessee 47 Memphis 7 3rd qtr score
Air Force 42 Army 22
Temple 28 Kent 10

Holy Cow! Navy put up 76 on ECU? You sure that wasnt a basketball exhibition game?.....lol. WOW. I would love to see Navy join us. To bad that would never happen.

The same Navy team who struggled past Georgia Southern 13-7.

(11-06-2010 10:32 PM)UCFL Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 10:23 PM)WVUeer Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 09:47 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  Scores from games of "potential candidates" (based on recent reports) from the week of 11/6:

TCU 47 Utah 7
Navy 76 ECU 35--? but Navy isn't competitive according to so many visitors here
UCF 40 Houston 33
Marshall 31 UAB17
Villanova 14 URI 17
Tennessee 47 Memphis 7 3rd qtr score
Air Force 42 Army 22
Temple 28 Kent 10

Holy Cow! Navy put up 76 on ECU? You sure that wasnt a basketball exhibition game?.....lol. WOW. I would love to see Navy join us. To bad that would never happen.

The same Navy team who struggled past Georgia Southern 13-7.

I know you are just trying to be funny, but Navy has much better upside than Nova in my mind.

But like it said in another post, the Big East will need to do this one piece at a time. And TCU should be that first piece.

Cheers,
Neil

(11-06-2010 10:32 PM)UCFL Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 10:23 PM)WVUeer Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 09:47 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  Scores from games of "potential candidates" (based on recent reports) from the week of 11/6:

TCU 47 Utah 7
Navy 76 ECU 35--? but Navy isn't competitive according to so many visitors here
UCF 40 Houston 33
Marshall 31 UAB17
Villanova 14 URI 17
Tennessee 47 Memphis 7 3rd qtr score
Air Force 42 Army 22
Temple 28 Kent 10

Holy Cow! Navy put up 76 on ECU? You sure that wasnt a basketball exhibition game?.....lol. WOW. I would love to see Navy join us. To bad that would never happen.

The same Navy team who struggled past Georgia Southern 13-7.

Actually that same Navy team that blew out Notre Dame....and they are the BE's FIRST target for expanding, right?

That Notre Dame team that lost to Tulsa, who ECU beat.

See how much yesterday's scores actually mean toward expansion?

(11-06-2010 10:39 PM)omnicarrier Wrote:  ESPN's Bill Simmons: "I love BC people - without them, everyone would want to move to Boston. They keep the numbers down. "

That's a great sig.

(11-07-2010 03:41 PM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 10:32 PM)UCFL Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 10:23 PM)WVUeer Wrote:  

(11-06-2010 09:47 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  Scores from games of "potential candidates" (based on recent reports) from the week of 11/6:

TCU 47 Utah 7
Navy 76 ECU 35--? but Navy isn't competitive according to so many visitors here
UCF 40 Houston 33
Marshall 31 UAB17
Villanova 14 URI 17
Tennessee 47 Memphis 7 3rd qtr score
Air Force 42 Army 22
Temple 28 Kent 10

Holy Cow! Navy put up 76 on ECU? You sure that wasnt a basketball exhibition game?.....lol. WOW. I would love to see Navy join us. To bad that would never happen.

The same Navy team who struggled past Georgia Southern 13-7.

Actually that same Navy team that blew out Notre Dame....and they are the BE's FIRST target for expanding, right?

That Notre Dame team that lost to Tulsa, who ECU beat.

See how much yesterday's scores actually mean toward expansion?

You can't use that argument. When a similar post was put up about Villanova-JMU-VT, certain fans went bonkers and said such an argument couldn't be made-you don't get to make it for your team now. Besides 76-35 is a major league beatdown, not just a loss.

Buckaineer he was just debunking the transitive property as well. Learn to read.

(11-07-2010 04:39 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  Buckaineer he was just debunking the transitive property as well. Learn to read.

Learn to read yourself and learn to reason--76-35 at home no less to a non-BCS program is a major league beatdown, not just a loss.

The UCF guy started it by saying the same Navy team that barely beat GSU. The Pirate guy debunked that argument by using examples that the transitive property in football holds nothing in the world of college football.

And duh that was a beatdown, I was there and saw it firsthand. But I don't think you interpreted the thread very well. Anyway, back to your tireless threads about things that really have no bearing on expansion.

As you were.

(11-07-2010 06:58 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  The UCF guy started it

I can't read anything written by Buck on this thread, but I am going to guess since I have never seen him mention scores of expansion candidates until now that he wants to rub in the fact that ECU got embarrassed.

(11-08-2010 02:16 PM)Knights_of_UCF Wrote:  

haha chill man the ucf post didn't bother me at all, I was just pointing out buck's post.

(11-07-2010 04:48 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(11-07-2010 04:39 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  Buckaineer he was just debunking the transitive property as well. Learn to read.

Learn to read yourself and learn to reason--76-35 at home no less to a non-BCS program is a major league beatdown, not just a loss.

What is wrong with you man? It's hilarious how much you hate ECU.

(11-08-2010 02:50 PM)HowardD11 Wrote:  

(11-07-2010 04:48 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(11-07-2010 04:39 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  Buckaineer he was just debunking the transitive property as well. Learn to read.

Learn to read yourself and learn to reason--76-35 at home no less to a non-BCS program is a major league beatdown, not just a loss.

What is wrong with you man? It's hilarious how much you hate ECU.

He started this thread as bait. He will say he didn't, but any reasonable person knows it. He is a troll with only one act.

He didn't even give a reply to my original point. He just brought up the Navy score, which in fact had nothing to do with what I was talking about. I mean damn..

(11-07-2010 04:48 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(11-07-2010 04:39 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  Buckaineer he was just debunking the transitive property as well. Learn to read.

Learn to read yourself and learn to reason--76-35 at home no less to a non-BCS program is a major league beatdown, not just a loss.

No one said it was not a beat down...But nice of you to point that out multiple times on one thread.

It was as ugly of a game as you can imagine and we deserve to be ridiculed for our performance. No excuses here....3 games left to try and somewhat redeem ourselves.

I'm just wondering....why haven't there been threads (or a single) thread tracking scores from all prior weeks in the season?

Why just the weekend ECU gets hammered by Navy?

that's interesting............

psss....(I already know the answer).............