(07-09-2010 06:36 PM)RiceDoc Wrote:  

(07-09-2010 05:06 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(07-08-2010 09:53 PM)RiceDoc Wrote:  Clearly anybody with the nom de plume of WMD deserves to be treated as a terrorist.

You never heard the stories about me and the "alleged biological warfare" 'experiments'.....

meh. Who didn't have moldy, uhh, food in their frig in those undergrad days decades ago...

Vegas will tell you the story. Dr. Saas almost had my ass.

http://www.msn.com/id/38176981/ns/us_new...york_times

The Obama administratiion is forcing employers to fire SUSPECTED illegals.

Some questions:

1. What if US citizens are accidnetly on the list of suspected illegals?
2. Taking away their jobs is the humane action?
3. I would guess they just move to another job eventually, so in the long run, what good does this do?

I was listening to a debate on the Arizona law on a major network the other day, and the anti-AL said that there would be cops bursting into homes to carry away screaming maids. At that point i realized that one reason the Administration is suing now, a month before the law takes effect, is that they must get something done before the law starts being enforced and there are no screaming maids to build their case on.
Much better to warn that the sky is falling than to try to prove it has fallen.

(07-11-2010 01:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  I was listening to a debate on the Arizona law on a major network the other day, and the anti-AL said that there would be cops bursting into homes to carry away screaming maids. At that point i realized that one reason the Administration is suing now, a month before the law takes effect, is that they must get something done before the law starts being enforced and there are no screaming maids to build their case on.
Much better to warn that the sky is falling than to try to prove it has fallen.

I know of at least five other challenges to the Arizona Law already pending in Federal Court. Combine them all into one civil action, get an expedited ruling from the District Court, go the 9th Circus, read their insanity, and then wait for the SCOTUS decide the matter.

In the end, I bet the Feds lose.

(07-11-2010 09:29 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(07-11-2010 01:02 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  I was listening to a debate on the Arizona law on a major network the other day, and the anti-AL said that there would be cops bursting into homes to carry away screaming maids. At that point i realized that one reason the Administration is suing now, a month before the law takes effect, is that they must get something done before the law starts being enforced and there are no screaming maids to build their case on.
Much better to warn that the sky is falling than to try to prove it has fallen.

I know of at least five other challenges to the Arizona Law already pending in Federal Court. Combine them all into one civil action, get an expedited ruling from the District Court, go the 9th Circus, read their insanity, and then wait for the SCOTUS decide the matter.

In the end, I bet the Feds lose.

Win or lose, I am tired of the BS over carloads of racist cops cruising neighborhoods looking for maids and gardeners, and the double-digit IQs that lap it up and regurgitate it.

Argue for it or against it, but stick to facts and reasonable projections.

That is what Obama has done in the court case (I think because he has to), but has NOT done in the Court of Public Opinion. Innuendo and flights of fancy rule.

I see Perry has gone the safe route, and will not support a similar law.