to beat at home. I don't think it's so much the altitude's effect on conditioning, but I do know as a golfer, a golf ball flys much further at 5,000 feet elevation than at sea level, or a few hundred feet above. The pros have to figure this in, but they can just take a lesser club that will hit the ball the proper distance with the same swing.
A basketball player doesn't have the luxury of shooting with a different piece of equipment. If a player takes their normal shot they have worked on a thousand times or more, the ball is probably going to travel at least a few inches further with the same amount of effort, and that's the difference between hitting the back of the rim, and going in the basket. Players have to mentally adjust to attain the correct feel to make the shot, especially perimeter shots. I have no concrete evidence, but I would bet most teams in our conference shoot a lower percentage from the 3 point line in Denver than anywhere else in the conference.
I thought about this last night when Chastity could hardly hit anything and most of her shots were probably going just a few inches further with the same effort she normally would use, thus hitting the back of the rim, rather than nothing but net. It reminded me of a time I was on a cruise ship, and they had a basketball goal out on the deck, and I was barely missing shots that I normally made and for awhile I couldn't figure out why, since I would normally know when I released the ball whether or not it was going in. It finally dawned on me that the boat is moving, and once I released the ball, the boat was moving ahead, and it affected the shot just enough that it would hit the rim instead of going in. Maybe our statistician, Pappy, can tell us how teams shoot the 3 in Denver as opposed to the rest of the conference games. I'd bet money they do better everywhere else.