(11-27-2009 03:42 PM)sterling1man Wrote:  Nice change in call by KIll not going for the onside kick.
Momentum of game has shifted.
We are being killed in stats but are only 2 TD's down!!!!!?

Of course - because it's not like they are gashing us or anything.

(11-27-2009 03:43 PM)7 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:42 PM)sterling1man Wrote:  Nice change in call by KIll not going for the onside kick.
Momentum of game has shifted.
We are being killed in stats but are only 2 TD's down!!!!!?

OH MY GOD MAKE IT STOP. WE'RE PLAYING CENTRAL MICHIGAN NOT FLORIDA.

What is your problem 7?

C. Mich will go for it on 4th and 1

505-255

chandler 10-19

spann 71

Oh wow we got it back.

Any chance of another NIU TD ?

Wow! Thanks!

We should have used a time out on D - on O we can control the clock at least. We let then take WAY too much time off of the clock.

Watch the qb draw by Harnish.

Interesting.. Ohio beat Temple

(11-27-2009 03:38 PM)sterling1man Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:37 PM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:27 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:23 PM)sterling1man Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:20 PM)armour248 Wrote:  This team does not deserve a bowl bid AT ALL. Give it to a 6-6 team who actually beat somebody.

Disagree. Did our 10-2 2004 NIU team, that beat 2 ranked teams and several winning teams deserve a Bowl bid over a 6-6 BCS team.

we only beat one winning team in 2003 - Maryland. just shows how that particular "stat" doesn't mean much

Yes it does - it means a ton - that you can't beat a winning team!!!

Has Illinois beat a winning team?

Off the top of my head I don't know - but what does that have to do with anything?

When we come back and win, it'll make a nice bowl promo video.

(11-27-2009 03:46 PM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  We should have used a time out on D - on O we can control the clock at least. We let then take WAY too much time off of the clock.

Our O has serious issues with time - they need the time outs.

(11-27-2009 03:43 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:42 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:38 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:36 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:32 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:30 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:26 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  I'd ignore DS...he's pretty clueless.

He thinks recruiting plays no role in college football or results.

Cause he's the smartest man on the planet.

no, it is just USELESS for fans with no knowledge of recruiting to even attempt to analyze such a thing. regardless of your Rivals subscription..

The people who use stars and things to analyze a recruit are dumb, and I've always agreed.

Those who analyze the number of recruits are spot on. If we have 1 verbal - and we have offers to guys going else where...that means we have to slide down our want list.

It's fairly simple to understand...which means you probably don't understand.

yes.. because recruiting is just THAT simple. 1 verbal = BAD!

Yes. It is.



It's hilarious how you don't understand that...

If you miss out on guys you want you have to slide further down your list to guys you don't want as much. Simple.

Idiot.

WOW! it must be that simple.. you have it all figured out! you should really apply for a recruiting coordinator position somewhere.. seriously

Why because I understand simple math?

You are by far the dumbest poster on this board, and we have a TON!

Recruiting is not important at all! We don't need players!

yes, because i said this..

you have to learn an important lesson in life - don't waste time worrying about things you ultimately know nothing about. ie RECRUITING

Wow what a terrible pass by Harnish! Was that supposed to be a screen??

I didn't see the pick six but jesus christ Harnish...Jesus.

(11-27-2009 03:48 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:43 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:42 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:38 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:36 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:32 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:30 PM)DSniu41 Wrote:  

(11-27-2009 03:26 PM)TheNEWguy Wrote:  I'd ignore DS...he's pretty clueless.

He thinks recruiting plays no role in college football or results.

Cause he's the smartest man on the planet.

no, it is just USELESS for fans with no knowledge of recruiting to even attempt to analyze such a thing. regardless of your Rivals subscription..

The people who use stars and things to analyze a recruit are dumb, and I've always agreed.

Those who analyze the number of recruits are spot on. If we have 1 verbal - and we have offers to guys going else where...that means we have to slide down our want list.

It's fairly simple to understand...which means you probably don't understand.

yes.. because recruiting is just THAT simple. 1 verbal = BAD!

Yes. It is.



It's hilarious how you don't understand that...

If you miss out on guys you want you have to slide further down your list to guys you don't want as much. Simple.

Idiot.

WOW! it must be that simple.. you have it all figured out! you should really apply for a recruiting coordinator position somewhere.. seriously

Why because I understand simple math?

You are by far the dumbest poster on this board, and we have a TON!

Recruiting is not important at all! We don't need players!

yes, because i said this..

you have to learn an important lesson in life - don't waste time worrying about things you ultimately know nothing about. ie RECRUITING

Again, another dumb post by the dumbest poster on this board.

You got owned...move on.

And like I've said all year, Harnish has not improved from last year. I feel so bad for our WRs.

COME ON GUYS WE'RE BEING DOMINATED IN STATS AND ARE ONLY DOWN BY 3 TDS!!!!!!111

THIS TEAM HAS HEART.

NIU has the ball back