(11-23-2009 06:54 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  To repeat...

A. Garrett Wolfe has zero business in the NFL

B. Comparing Garrett Wolfe to Darren Sproles is the height of insanity. The ONLY thing they share in common is height. Sproles is much thicker and more physicial than Wolfe and came out of college a proven return man.

C. The Bears pissed away a 3rd round pick on Wolfe. I cringed when the pick was made and nothing has ever changed that.

D. Wolfe is officially DONE in the NFL.

Huh - he has 5.5 ypc this year and 4.0 for his career.

The Bears NEVER used him properly out of the backfield or as a third-down back.

Just look at the success players have after they leave the Bears - I don't think Wolfe is an every down back but he should be getting 10-12 touches a game. Add his EXCELLENT special teams play and you have a guy who should be playing in the NFL.

Wolfe didn't prove himself in college?? Wow that is an asinine statement. Just look at what he did against Big 11 teams.

If Forte would put the bong down for a minute....

He might actually be a good back.

(11-23-2009 06:54 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  To repeat...

A. Garrett Wolfe has zero business in the NFL

B. Comparing Garrett Wolfe to Darren Sproles is the height of insanity. The ONLY thing they share in common is height. Sproles is much thicker and more physicial than Wolfe and came out of college a proven return man.

C. The Bears pissed away a 3rd round pick on Wolfe. I cringed when the pick was made and nothing has ever changed that.

D. Wolfe is officially DONE in the NFL.

You're cracked. He's a second string RB (and has proven on the field he's better than the first string RB) on an NFL team, and is one of the best special teams players on the team, yet according to you, he has "zero business in the NFL." At least if you backed up these stupid comments with some facts you wouldn't sound like such an a-hole, but it just comes across like you don't like Wolfe, and that very fact means he's not NFL quality to you.

(11-24-2009 10:42 AM)NIU Chicago Wrote:  

(11-23-2009 06:54 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  To repeat...

A. Garrett Wolfe has zero business in the NFL

B. Comparing Garrett Wolfe to Darren Sproles is the height of insanity. The ONLY thing they share in common is height. Sproles is much thicker and more physicial than Wolfe and came out of college a proven return man.

C. The Bears pissed away a 3rd round pick on Wolfe. I cringed when the pick was made and nothing has ever changed that.

D. Wolfe is officially DONE in the NFL.

Huh - he has 5.5 ypc this year and 4.0 for his career.

The Bears NEVER used him properly out of the backfield or as a third-down back.

Just look at the success players have after they leave the Bears - I don't think Wolfe is an every down back but he should be getting 10-12 touches a game. Add his EXCELLENT special teams play and you have a guy who should be playing in the NFL.

Wolfe didn't prove himself in college?? Wow that is an asinine statement. Just look at what he did against Big 11 teams.

Exactly. Wolfe had (and may still have) the record for most yards per carry in Div. 1A/FBS HISTORY!!! But he didn't get it running up the middle every play like the football genius Ron Turner likes to have him do.

(11-25-2009 02:38 AM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  

(11-23-2009 06:54 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  To repeat...

A. Garrett Wolfe has zero business in the NFL

B. Comparing Garrett Wolfe to Darren Sproles is the height of insanity. The ONLY thing they share in common is height. Sproles is much thicker and more physicial than Wolfe and came out of college a proven return man.

C. The Bears pissed away a 3rd round pick on Wolfe. I cringed when the pick was made and nothing has ever changed that.

D. Wolfe is officially DONE in the NFL.

You're cracked. He's a second string RB (and has proven on the field he's better than the first string RB) on an NFL team, and is one of the best special teams players on the team, yet according to you, he has "zero business in the NFL." At least if you backed up these stupid comments with some facts you would sound like such an a-hole, but it just comes across like you don't like Wolfe, and that very fact means he's not NFL quality to you.

I've given up responding to Nigel's posts regarding Wolfe. He says the same thing over and over and over again.

You will not find a single NFL team that thinks Garrett Wolfe is a legitimate backup running back in the league. Not a single one. Wolfe is done in the NFL. He should have been an undrafted free agent to begin with, but unfortunately for the Bears Jerry Angelo pissed away a 3rd round pick on a dimunitive project player.

Wolfe will not be back in the NFL. I say that with 100% certainty. The Michael Turner comparison is absolutely insane. Turner showed from his rookie season in San Diego that he was a legitimate NFL running back. Unfortunately for Turner he spent his first few years backing up the best running back in the league at the time, LaDainian Tomlinson.

So Nigel, how do you explain that Wolfe's ypc is significantly better than Forte's???

(11-25-2009 12:10 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  You will not find a single NFL team that thinks Garrett Wolfe is a legitimate backup running back in the league. Not a single one. Wolfe is done in the NFL. He should have been an undrafted free agent to begin with, but unfortunately for the Bears Jerry Angelo pissed away a 3rd round pick on a dimunitive project player.

Wolfe will not be back in the NFL. I say that with 100% certainty. The Michael Turner comparison is absolutely insane. Turner showed from his rookie season in San Diego that he was a legitimate NFL running back. Unfortunately for Turner he spent his first few years backing up the best running back in the league at the time, LaDainian Tomlinson.

If you are wrong on your 100%, will you not post for a full year? I think he will make a rooster as a #3 back that is great on special teams. If you are that sure, put something on the line.

(11-25-2009 12:34 PM)HuskieJ Wrote:  

(11-25-2009 12:10 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  You will not find a single NFL team that thinks Garrett Wolfe is a legitimate backup running back in the league. Not a single one. Wolfe is done in the NFL. He should have been an undrafted free agent to begin with, but unfortunately for the Bears Jerry Angelo pissed away a 3rd round pick on a dimunitive project player.

Wolfe will not be back in the NFL. I say that with 100% certainty. The Michael Turner comparison is absolutely insane. Turner showed from his rookie season in San Diego that he was a legitimate NFL running back. Unfortunately for Turner he spent his first few years backing up the best running back in the league at the time, LaDainian Tomlinson.

If you are wrong on your 100%, will you not post for a full year? I think he will make a rooster as a #3 back that is great on special teams. If you are that sure, put something on the line.

I don't know about this rooster thing - but I definitely think he'll make a roster! :)

(11-25-2009 12:29 PM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  So Nigel, how do you explain that Wolfe's ypc is significantly better than Forte's???

Even YOU aren't that stupid....er, I think. It's called valid statistical sample size...Garrett Wolfe has run the ball so few times in the last three seasons that looking at his YPC stat is a fool's exercise.

Wolfe is done in the NFL. And I won't post for 2 years continuous if I am wrong in that prediction.

(11-25-2009 05:20 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  

(11-25-2009 12:29 PM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  So Nigel, how do you explain that Wolfe's ypc is significantly better than Forte's???

Even YOU aren't that stupid....er, I think. It's called valid statistical sample size...Garrett Wolfe has run the ball so few times in the last three seasons that looking at his YPC stat is a fool's exercise.

Wolfe is done in the NFL. And I won't post for 2 years continuous if I am wrong in that prediction.

Can someone sticky this?

(11-25-2009 06:29 PM)niusfactuary Wrote:  

(11-25-2009 05:20 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  

(11-25-2009 12:29 PM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  So Nigel, how do you explain that Wolfe's ypc is significantly better than Forte's???

Even YOU aren't that stupid....er, I think. It's called valid statistical sample size...Garrett Wolfe has run the ball so few times in the last three seasons that looking at his YPC stat is a fool's exercise.

Wolfe is done in the NFL. And I won't post for 2 years continuous if I am wrong in that prediction.

Can someone sticky this?

If Garrette Wolfe is done in the NFL it is a shame. He never played for an offensive coordinator that gave him a chance to see what he could produce with a decent number of carries. I always wondered what he would do if he got 20 to 25 carries in a game. We will never know as long as he plays for Ron Turner.

(11-25-2009 05:20 PM)Nigel Incubator-Jones Wrote:  

(11-25-2009 12:29 PM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  So Nigel, how do you explain that Wolfe's ypc is significantly better than Forte's???

Even YOU aren't that stupid....er, I think. It's called valid statistical sample size...Garrett Wolfe has run the ball so few times in the last three seasons that looking at his YPC stat is a fool's exercise.

Wolfe is done in the NFL. And I won't post for 2 years continuous if I am wrong in that prediction.

I think Wolfe has run it enough to prove he's better than Forte - and Forte has ran it more than enough to prove he sucks.