Cincy up to #5, Pitt to #9, WVU at #23, USF #24 (guess the coaches don't realize we beat WVU):

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/f...atpoll.htm

(11-08-2009 12:47 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  Cincy up to #5, Pitt to #9, USF to #24:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/f...atpoll.htm

Guess some coaches forgot that the Bulls beat WV last week. LOL.

Anyways good to have 4 BE teams in top 25 but BOTH WV and USF must win this week or theyll be out.

(11-08-2009 12:50 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  Guess some coaches forgot that the Bulls beat WV last week. LOL.

Yes, that's pretty silly. They also don't seem to know that USC beat Ohio State.

And yes, good thing to have 4 in the top 25.

I told y'all we'd have half the conference in the poll today...

Nice!

wow, this after none in the preseason poll! Talk about proving it!

Remember some of the people posting all over the place that the MWC should have our BCS bid because they had 3 teams ranked in the preseason polls and the Big East had none? It's who finishes the race that matters, not who starts it.

Interesting that the BE and SEC are the only confs with 2 teams in the top 10

Temple is getting more votes than BC, Oklahoma and tennesse LOL

(11-08-2009 01:16 PM)CatsClaw Wrote:  Remember some of the people posting all over the place that the MWC should have our BCS bid because they had 3 teams ranked in the preseason polls and the Big East had none? It's who finishes the race that matters, not who starts it.

This puts me in mind of the gurney race on MASH. Bouncing Betty ran last all race, until she won by a breast at the end. Thank goodness she had big'uns. She was an Al Bundy kind of gal...

(11-08-2009 01:26 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  Temple is getting more votes than BC, Oklahoma and tennesse LOL

#33 baby

(11-08-2009 01:16 PM)CatsClaw Wrote:  Remember some of the people posting all over the place that the MWC should have our BCS bid because they had 3 teams ranked in the preseason polls and the Big East had none? It's who finishes the race that matters, not who starts it.

We should heed that advice too. Games and bowls to be played still.

(11-08-2009 01:48 PM)mattsarz Wrote:  

(11-08-2009 01:16 PM)CatsClaw Wrote:  Remember some of the people posting all over the place that the MWC should have our BCS bid because they had 3 teams ranked in the preseason polls and the Big East had none? It's who finishes the race that matters, not who starts it.

We should heed that advice too. Games and bowls to be played still.

It doesn't matter. My point is, these people were saying that the Big East didn't have a preseason Top 25 team, thus we weren't going to have any Top 25 teams. That is obviously false.