Pomeroy against our #233. If the guys that created these computer rankings were judging beauty contests, I'd sure as Hell hate to see what the winners looked like. "Well she might have buckteeth, stand 4'8" tall and weigh 300 pounds, but the computer picks her ahead of Heidi Klum and all those Playboy bunnies. The computer takes the human element out of it, don't you know"!

(01-06-2009 03:41 PM)Dr. J. Wrote:  Well she might have buckteeth, stand 4'8" tall and weigh 300 pounds...

You got something against 300-pound buckteeth dwarfs..?

(01-06-2009 03:48 PM)Scotto Wrote:  [quote='Dr. J.' pid='3875514' dateline='1231274474']
Well she might have buckteeth, stand 4'8" tall and weigh 300 pounds...

You got something against 300-pound buckteeth dwarfs..?

I just don't like the thought of making love to a bowling ball with buckteeth.

(01-06-2009 04:03 PM)Dr. J. Wrote:  

(01-06-2009 03:48 PM)Scotto Wrote:  [quote='Dr. J.' pid='3875514' dateline='1231274474']
Well she might have buckteeth, stand 4'8" tall and weigh 300 pounds...

You got something against 300-pound buckteeth dwarfs..?

I just don't like the thought of making love to a bowling ball with buckteeth.

I think they prefer midgets.

(01-06-2009 04:05 PM)michmaster Wrote:  I think they prefer midgets.

The dwarfs prefer midgets..??? I'm confused.

(01-06-2009 03:41 PM)Dr. J. Wrote:  Pomeroy against our #233. If the guys that created these computer rankings were judging beauty contests, I'd sure as Hell hate to see what the winners looked like. "Well she might have buckteeth, stand 4'8" tall and weigh 300 pounds, but the computer picks her ahead of Heidi Klum and all those Playboy bunnies. The computer takes the human element out of it, don't you know"!

I don't know Heidi Klum, and but I do remember Playboy Bunnies, but, what do you know about the Playboy Bunnies Doc? I said "I remember the Playboy Bunnies." Would Heidi perhaps be a recent Bunnie?:tmi:

(01-06-2009 04:30 PM)LRTrojan Wrote:  [quote='Dr. J.' pid='3875514' dateline='1231274474']
Pomeroy against our #233. If the guys that created these computer rankings were judging beauty contests, I'd sure as Hell hate to see what the winners looked like. "Well she might have buckteeth, stand 4'8" tall and weigh 300 pounds, but the computer picks her ahead of Heidi Klum and all those Playboy bunnies. The computer takes the human element out of it, don't you know"!

I don't know Heidi Klum, and but I do remember Playboy Bunnies, but, what do you know about the Playboy Bunnies Doc? I said "I remember the Playboy Bunnies." Would Heidi perhaps be a recent Bunnie?:tmi:

She's the current Christy Brinkley. Does that mean anything to you? She is on the talk shows and I think has her own line of lingere.

If a team wanted to help thier rpi and could choose between Oral Roberts or UALR, which team do you think would help / hurt rpi more? Playing UALR at 233, or playing Oral Roberts at 105?


This is the perfect illustration of what I am preaching about rpi in the Sunbelt. Playing Oral Roberts will hurt your rpi where as playing UALR will help most teams' rpi.

Oral Roberts has played a lot of teams with winning records. Opponents' win% counts for half of rpi. But Oral Roberts has lost most of those games. That means that Oral Roberts has pretty good rpi, but that anyone who plays Oral Roberts will see thier rpi drop because Oral Roberts' paltry win % will hurt you twice as much as it hurts them.

I want a Sunbelt full of UALR's instead of Oral Roberts. Its a shell game, granted. But I think it is a shell game that can be won if you know the rules.