kentalum22 Wrote:Sorry, David, Omaha is not Denver.
So, basically you're upset that they didn't get the region where you could see them play. As you wrote earlier:
kentalum22 Wrote:I wish they were coming to Denver so I could of seen them up close and in person.
I don't understand what's so much better if we got placed elsewhere for the team.
We're still an 8 or 9 seed *period*. No matter where we're placed geographically, we still play a #1 in round 2. Hell, I'm not even sure if any of your 'warrants' even continue to support your claim of 'our site screws us'. You go on to write:
kentalum22 Wrote:It is not even compare to any of the other sites where they could of been chosen. Its easy to say beggers can't be choosers but we earned a better desitnation and bracket then this. They definately are putting the shaft to Kent State and don't want them to advance far
The fix isn't in. You really think the selection process went like: *giggle* Laing is out in the hallway, let's f--- with his team *giggle* Oh! I know! Let's make them play Kansas *giggle*
There's no such thing as an easy bracket unless you're a #1 or maybe #2. Even then, you still gotta play your heart out. I just find it hard to believe that our location matters. I don't think Q is going to play better defense because they're a mile high in Denver. I don't think Fisher is going to turn the ball over less because they're playing in sunny Tampa. I don't think Mike Scott is going to jump higher in Anaheim.
Next, you say Butler:
kentalum22 Wrote:Butler is another story. They received a 7 seed and have to Tenn/Louisville/UNC. This team was ranked 10th in the country and this is how they are rewarded.
Yeah, and? Seriously, check what Butler actually did this year and see if you really think they deserved to be ranked #10 this season. Let's do a real quick blind test.
Team A: RPI is 17, SOS is 128, 10-3 against the RPI top 100 (1-1 against the top 50)
Team B: RPI is 22, SOS is 111, 11-3 against the RPI top 100 (2-2 against the top 50)
Almost identical right? Tell me which of those teams gets a 7 and which gets a 9? Team A is Butler, Team B is Kent State. The answer is then "maybe Kent deserved a higher seed". Yeah, maybe we did. But no one here thought we deserved anything higher than a 7. A 7 is what Butler earned with their schedule.
If you go look at the RPI, you'll notice the group right around us makes up 3 of the 8/9 seeds (Indiana, BYU, UNLV). That's half the 8/9 seeds, so I don't think we got misseeded. I don't think there's much of any argument that the teams ahead of us should be lower, and I don't think you're trying to argue that.
But hell, I'm not even sure what your argument is in any of these threads. You just seem to want to complain that we're getting shafted in some way. You offer absolutely no basis for any of those claims besides "damn, we have to play Kansas in round 2" and "Nebraska has a lot of corn". It honestly seems like you just want to find some reason to complain, none of which are grounded in reality. You whine like an Akron fan...
So please, sit down! shut up!