THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:Wow! ....
The biggest fantasy for evolution is the majority of scientists agree the universe has a beginning. The beginning of the universe is where the disagreement originates and what evolutionists can't rationally explain. How could something start from nothing the volume of gas needed to form the universe would be beyond comprehension. Where did the gas come from, with no heat source and no gravitational forces in existence if the universe has no boundaries how could there be any pressure what would cause the gases to explode? The one thing evolutionists can not explain is the source for matter needed to create the universe.
Wow is right. You manage to completely misunderstand what the theory of evolution says and then try to pass yourself off as knowledgeable. Evolution says nil, nada, zlich, nothing about the origin of life. Evolution speaks only to the diversity of life on this planet and how that diversity came about. All that bull about where did gas come from, gravitational forces, the source of matter and the boundaries of the universe are completely non-sequiturs.
It seems clear to me that you don't have a problem with evolution, you have a problem with reality-based science. If you want to cover your eyes and ears and sing "lalalala", fine, but don't force your views on anyone else.
Also let me show you what is wrong with your "experiment".
Quote:Really there has been observed life from non-living chemicals with no intervention by scientists aka creators!!! That is truly amazing if this has in fact ever been observed it would end the creationism debate, but it hasn't. If it has been observed in laboratory conditions it is because scientists aka creators put the chemicals together under the precise conditions needed to start the process for life. Any experiment like this would prove creationism NOT evolution.
First such an experiment wouldn't
prove much at all. Evolution does not even enter into this experiment. What would be shown would be that life can arise from non-life, if they did this. Second, it wouldn't determine what actually started life on this planet at all. It could be panspermia, it could be some creator, it could be abiogenesis. It certainly doesn't prove creationism.
Finally, atheism isn't a religion. evolution isn't a religion. I also went to Catholic school (grades 4-12), and I was taught evolution (and other good science) there. I went on to college to do quite well in engineering.