Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Author Message
bearcatfan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,520
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 192
I Root For: The Bearcats!
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
goodknightfl Wrote:
shocknawe Wrote:Hope the conference is happy with their choice now.

I don't know about that.. U beat a 7-5 cusa school by only 10.

Way to stick up for your conference! 03-lmfao
12-29-2007 09:21 PM
Find all posts by this user
Stookey57 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,652
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 142
I Root For: UConn, BC
Location: Boston
Post: #22
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
CatsClaw Wrote:
LaRue777 Wrote:I would bet that the bowls picked the teams and not the conference. I do agree that Cinci would have matched up better with Wake.

There was talk from the Cincinnati broadcasters (during the Cincinnati/Syracuse game) that Mike Tranghese and the Big East were pushing hard for the Tire Bowl to take Connecticut over Cincinnati. That's why I don't blame UConn for the Tire Bowl thing I blame Tranghese. Connecticut deserved what they got, they have Big East championship rings and a Top 25 ranking (BCS). That being said, I just thought that it would have been better from a pure matchup stand point. Cincinnati would have given Wake all kind of trouble, particularly because Mauk would have been going against his old team. UConn obviously would have hammered Southern Miss. But that's neither here nor there, what's done is done, and that game was frustrating because UConn should have won that game. That being said, UConn is a program on the rise, no doubt about it.

Yes an d to rise you need the right people like a 1st class offensive coordinator, which we don't have, it's time to dismantle the good 0le boy network...........We were out coached, the kids played thier hearts out, even ESPN said the offensive coaches sux wind.
Look what coaching did for my Patriots 16-0......,

The State 0f Conn went 1st class spent big $$$$, now it's time to get a 1st class offensive coordinator..........
12-29-2007 11:38 PM
Find all posts by this user
Stookey57 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,652
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 142
I Root For: UConn, BC
Location: Boston
Post: #23
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
army56mike Wrote:Yes, Cincy would have won that game.
Yes, UConn sucked out loud. They were pretty lucky this season and the luck ran out.
I hate that the BEast lost a bowl game, but at least it was UConn and not a good team that lost.

You are a typical couch potatoe, probaly never played organized fb in your flucking pathetic life.

We earned what we got on the grid iron, you can't blame the kids for a sucky offensive coordinator who is part of a good ole boy network that must change.....
12-29-2007 11:48 PM
Find all posts by this user
Stookey57 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,652
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 142
I Root For: UConn, BC
Location: Boston
Post: #24
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
UltimateCFBfan Wrote:yea but I heard Mike T was lobyying for Uconn....its a complete joke Cincy should have been there. Uconn just embarassed the BE. CO-BE champs lose twice to ACC teams to UVA and Wake Forest......

You also lie what credible source revealed this schmuck, another coach boy who never played a day of organzed sports in his or her pathetic life...........
12-29-2007 11:51 PM
Find all posts by this user
Stookey57 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,652
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 142
I Root For: UConn, BC
Location: Boston
Post: #25
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
BJUnklFkr Wrote:
Wilkie01 Wrote:
shocknawe Wrote:Hope the conference is happy with their choice now.

Agree. 04-cheers

In fact, with out the blown fair-catch call against the Cards, UConn would not have qualified for that game. 05-stirthepot

Yeah! F**king Loserville 03-lmfao 03-nerner 03-nutkick



You pathetic troll still talk about the fair catch, how bout the other blown call, we won the game fair and square in the 4th qtr..
(This post was last modified: 12-29-2007 11:57 PM by Stookey57.)
12-29-2007 11:56 PM
Find all posts by this user
UltimateCFBfan Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,134
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 17
I Root For: R! U! RAH! RAH!
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
You didn't win **** fair and square you lost to UL you lost to temple. You are really 7-6. Get over it stop bashing everyone else for speaking the truth. I love how your insults are "you haven't played a down of organized football"......yea buddy but neither has the Uconn football team...... 04-chairshot
(This post was last modified: 12-30-2007 12:15 AM by UltimateCFBfan.)
12-30-2007 12:14 AM
Find all posts by this user
Crimsonelf Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,568
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 22
I Root For: Cardinals
Location:
Post: #27
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
UltimateCFBfan Wrote:You didn't win **** fair and square you lost to UL you lost to temple. You are really 7-6. Get over it stop bashing everyone else for speaking the truth. I love how your insults are "you haven't played a down of organized football"......yea buddy but neither has the Uconn football team...... 04-chairshot

03-nutkick 03-lmfao 03-lmfao 03-lmfao
12-30-2007 12:29 AM
Find all posts by this user
BullsBEAST Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,314
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 27
I Root For: USF Bulls
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Post: #28
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Dont blame uconn, should they have denied the CCB invite?

I do agree that cincy would have beat WF, which would have been better for us as a whole because we need 4 teams ranked, but whatever.
12-30-2007 02:02 AM
Find all posts by this user
brista21 Offline
The Birthplace of College Football
*

Posts: 10,042
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 262
I Root For: Rutgers
Location: North Jersey

Donators
Post: #29
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Stookey57 Wrote:
CatsClaw Wrote:
LaRue777 Wrote:I would bet that the bowls picked the teams and not the conference. I do agree that Cinci would have matched up better with Wake.

There was talk from the Cincinnati broadcasters (during the Cincinnati/Syracuse game) that Mike Tranghese and the Big East were pushing hard for the Tire Bowl to take Connecticut over Cincinnati. That's why I don't blame UConn for the Tire Bowl thing I blame Tranghese. Connecticut deserved what they got, they have Big East championship rings and a Top 25 ranking (BCS). That being said, I just thought that it would have been better from a pure matchup stand point. Cincinnati would have given Wake all kind of trouble, particularly because Mauk would have been going against his old team. UConn obviously would have hammered Southern Miss. But that's neither here nor there, what's done is done, and that game was frustrating because UConn should have won that game. That being said, UConn is a program on the rise, no doubt about it.

Yes an d to rise you need the right people like a 1st class offensive coordinator, which we don't have, it's time to dismantle the good 0le boy network...........We were out coached, the kids played thier hearts out, even ESPN said the offensive coaches sux wind.
Look what coaching did for my Patriots 16-0......,

The State 0f Conn went 1st class spent big $$$$, now it's time to get a 1st class offensive coordinator..........

16-0 aww yea!!! The first time I've ever gotten to see the Patriots in person before and I got to witness history in the making. It was also the first time that Giants Stadium got as loud as Rutgers Stadium despite having 33K more bodies stacked in it.
12-30-2007 08:31 AM
Find all posts by this user
Wilkie01 Offline
Cards Prognosticater
Jersey Retired

Posts: 26,753
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 1072
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Planet Red
Post: #30
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Stookey57 Wrote:
BJUnklFkr Wrote:
Wilkie01 Wrote:
shocknawe Wrote:Hope the conference is happy with their choice now.

Agree. 04-cheers

In fact, with out the blown fair-catch call against the Cards, UConn would not have qualified for that game. 05-stirthepot

Yeah! F**king Loserville 03-lmfao 03-nerner 03-nutkick

You pathetic troll still talk about the fair catch, how bout the other blown call, we won the game fair and square in the 4th qtr..

Yawn!
12-30-2007 09:34 AM
Find all posts by this user
Longstrangetrip Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 782
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 22
I Root For: Uconn
Location:
Post: #31
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
UltimateCFBfan Wrote:You didn't win **** fair and square you lost to UL you lost to temple. You are really 7-6. Get over it stop bashing everyone else for speaking the truth. I love how your insults are "you haven't played a down of organized football"......yea buddy but neither has the Uconn football team...... 04-chairshot



Thanks to the classy fans in this thread.

To the rest, especially you ***** ass baby UL fans. F*CK YOU. You tell us to " get over it " and yet here you are MONTHS later STILL bitching and moaning. You want a pacie little baby? Or perhaps its time to change your tampons?
12-30-2007 09:53 AM
Find all posts by this user
CatsClaw Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,170
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 185
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location: The land of Winning
Post: #32
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Stookey57 Wrote:
CatsClaw Wrote:
LaRue777 Wrote:I would bet that the bowls picked the teams and not the conference. I do agree that Cinci would have matched up better with Wake.

There was talk from the Cincinnati broadcasters (during the Cincinnati/Syracuse game) that Mike Tranghese and the Big East were pushing hard for the Tire Bowl to take Connecticut over Cincinnati. That's why I don't blame UConn for the Tire Bowl thing I blame Tranghese. Connecticut deserved what they got, they have Big East championship rings and a Top 25 ranking (BCS). That being said, I just thought that it would have been better from a pure matchup stand point. Cincinnati would have given Wake all kind of trouble, particularly because Mauk would have been going against his old team. UConn obviously would have hammered Southern Miss. But that's neither here nor there, what's done is done, and that game was frustrating because UConn should have won that game. That being said, UConn is a program on the rise, no doubt about it.

Yes an d to rise you need the right people like a 1st class offensive coordinator, which we don't have, it's time to dismantle the good 0le boy network...........We were out coached, the kids played thier hearts out, even ESPN said the offensive coaches sux wind.
Look what coaching did for my Patriots 16-0......,

The State 0f Conn went 1st class spent big $$$$, now it's time to get a 1st class offensive coordinator..........


I agree. I posted somewhere that I see a lot of Virginia Tech in Connecticut. Strong defense, strong special teams, good depth, solid running game, etc. They also have the same thing that VT has: suspect offense. With a solid offensive coordinator and a play maker in the receiving core Connecticut is easily a Top 20 program.
(This post was last modified: 12-30-2007 10:01 AM by CatsClaw.)
12-30-2007 10:00 AM
Find all posts by this user
Wilkie01 Offline
Cards Prognosticater
Jersey Retired

Posts: 26,753
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 1072
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Planet Red
Post: #33
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
03-nutkick You proved by the way you played that the Temple and Louisville games were given to you. West Virginia is the Real Big East Champions and you know it! 03-phew
12-30-2007 10:03 AM
Find all posts by this user
Longstrangetrip Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 782
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 22
I Root For: Uconn
Location:
Post: #34
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Wilkie01 Wrote:03-nutkick You proved by the way you played that the Temple and Louisville games were given to you. West Virginia is the Real Big East Champions and you know it! 03-phew

Seriously, its not our fault you guys really suck and couldnt stop us and hold a 10 point lead. The Temple reciever never had the ball while his feet were in no matter how you and the temple losers would like to rewrite it.

Also not our fault the way the BE rules work on tie brakers or head to head results. So there you have that.
12-30-2007 10:17 AM
Find all posts by this user
Wilkie01 Offline
Cards Prognosticater
Jersey Retired

Posts: 26,753
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 1072
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Planet Red
Post: #35
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Yawn
12-30-2007 10:47 AM
Find all posts by this user
BcatMatt13 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,306
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 204
I Root For: The Bearcats
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Longstrangetrip Wrote:
Wilkie01 Wrote:03-nutkick You proved by the way you played that the Temple and Louisville games were given to you. West Virginia is the Real Big East Champions and you know it! 03-phew

Seriously, its not our fault you guys really suck and couldnt stop us and hold a 10 point lead. The Temple reciever never had the ball while his feet were in no matter how you and the temple losers would like to rewrite it.

Also not our fault the way the BE rules work on tie brakers or head to head results. So there you have that.



The fact that UCONN was even in a position to lose to TEMPLE is sad.

Think the car care bowl will be a little wiser next time and actally do some research?!?03-banghead
12-30-2007 11:09 AM
Find all posts by this user
LaRue777 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,522
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 16
I Root For: WVU,ECU,MI
Location: Maryland
Post: #37
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
CatsClaw Wrote:First of all, starting this thread might not have been smart because now you're going to get some angry, frustrated and intense UConn fans reading that title and going crazy.
You got that right. This one is ready for the smack board.
12-30-2007 11:13 AM
Find all posts by this user
shocknawe Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,287
Joined: Dec 2004
I Root For: The Bearcats
Location:
Post: #38
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
Look, I wasn't trying to talk smack. I am just stating my opinion. I honestly think UC would have beaten Wake. Uconn is a decent team but they are not even close to having the same type of talent as this year's UC team.
(This post was last modified: 12-30-2007 12:35 PM by shocknawe.)
12-30-2007 12:34 PM
Find all posts by this user
UltimateCFBfan Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,134
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 17
I Root For: R! U! RAH! RAH!
Location:
Post: #39
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
shocknawe Wrote:Look, I wasn't trying to talk smack. I am just stating my opinion. I honestly think UC would have beaten Wake. Uconn is a decent team but they are not even close to having the same type of talent as this year's UC team.

I think every Non Uconn Big East fan probably agrees with you.
12-30-2007 01:11 PM
Find all posts by this user
goodknightfl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,171
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 518
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Bearcats would have beaten Wake
USFMike Wrote:
goodknightfl Wrote:
shocknawe Wrote:Hope the conference is happy with their choice now.

I don't know about that.. U beat a 7-5 cusa school by only 10.

anyone who watched the game knows the td in the final minutes made it closer than it looked. how'd your bowl game go buddy? or was it considered another moral victory.

No it was a loss.. plain and simple.. But the statement that Cincy would have beaten Wake is just plain dumb.. They may have won.. they may have loss.. they didn't play so no one knows.
12-30-2007 05:33 PM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.