Biggest overachievers,
http://www.codevision.com/frr/over20.html

Biggest underachievers,
The bottom ten (worst is last): UAB, NC State, Iowa, Syracuse, Duke, Minnesota, North Carolina, Mississippi, Notre Dame, Miami-FL.

Best Big East overachievers,
http://www.codevision.com/frr/be.html

It is because most of the recruiting reports are designed to sell subscriptions. It is really impossible to judge two different high school recruits that play in different levels of competition in two different regions.

Miami is loaded with "4 and 5" star recruits. They can't win half their games?

The way those rankings work is the services look to see what schools are recruiting a kid. If a lot of the bigger schools are offering, his ranking goes way up. Of course, that presupposes those teams really know their talent. Sometimes they do. Sometimes they're so far off base it's funny.

Basically, those rankings are a decent indicator. But take it with a grain of salt.

It is nice to see half of The BEast listed there. It would have been nicer if Syracuse wasn't on the list of the bottom 10.