http://cfn.scout.com/2/557949.html

I guess this is the only poll that matters.

BCS Rankings

Oct. 28 Week 3

BCS Computer Rankings | CFN Rankings | Coaches Poll | Harris Poll
2007 BCS Rankings Week 1 | Week 2
Rank TEAM Harris Votes % of 2850 USA Today Votes % of 1500 Computer % of 100 points BCS Average
1 Ohio State 2850 1.0000 1495 0.9967 0.930 0.9756
2 Boston Coll 2665 0.9351 1414 0.9427 0.990 0.9559
3 LSU 2568 0.9011 1324 0.8827 0.880 0.8879
4 Arizona St 2291 0.8039 1221 0.8140 0.930 0.8493
5 Oregon 2433 0.8537 1280 0.8533 0.810 0.8390
6 Oklahoma 2451 0.8600 1269 0.8460 0.670 0.7920
7 West Va 2232 0.7832 1177 0.7847 0.760 0.7759
8 Kansas 2047 0.7182 1108 0.7387 0.860 0.7723
9 Missouri 1923 0.6747 983 0.6553 0.500 0.6100
10 Georgia 1507 0.5288 791 0.5273 0.690 0.5820
11 Va Tech 1286 0.4512 736 0.4907 0.630 0.5240
12 Michigan 1283 0.4502 701 0.4673 0.360 0.4258
13 Connecticut 829 0.2909 419 0.2793 0.570 0.3801
14 Hawaii 1640 0.5754 769 0.5127 0.000 0.3627
15 Texas 1514 0.5312 753 0.5020 0.000 0.3444
16 Auburn 844 0.2961 454 0.3027 0.390 0.3296
17 Alabama 891 0.3126 439 0.2927 0.370 0.3251
18 South Fla 602 0.2112 291 0.1940 0.560 0.3217
19 USC 1312 0.4604 679 0.4527 0.040 0.3177
20 Florida 921 0.3232 451 0.3007 0.320 0.3146
21 Wisconsin 572 0.2007 422 0.2813 0.000 0.1607
22 Boise State 394 0.1382 218 0.1453 0.180 0.1545
23 Virginia 203 0.0712 119 0.0793 0.310 0.1535
24 W. Forest 272 0.0954 115 0.0767 0.250 0.1407
25 Clemson 169 0.0593 145 0.0967 0.250 0.1353
26 So Carolina 322 0.1130 131 0.0873 0.120 0.1068
27 Tennessee 127 0.0446 64 0.0427 0.210 0.0991
28 Kentucky 284 0.0996 159 0.1060 0.030 0.0785
29 Purdue 194 0.0681 107 0.0713 0.070 0.0698
30 California 250 0.0877 118 0.0787 0.000 0.0555
31 Penn State 63 0.0221 53 0.0353 0.000 0.0191
32 Illinois 15 0.0053 21 0.0140 0.000 0.0064
33 Kansas St 10 0.0035 20 0.0133 0.000 0.0056
34 Florida St 0 0.0000 2 0.0013 0.010 0.0038
35 BYU 7 0.0025 13 0.0087 0.000 0.0037
36 Cincinnati 15 0.0053 8 0.0053 0.000 0.0035
37 UCLA 24 0.0084 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0028
38 Okla St 3 0.0011 11 0.0073 0.000 0.0028
39 Texas Tech 5 0.0018 8 0.0053 0.000 0.0024
40 Rutgers 10 0.0035 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0012
41 Oregon St 5 0.0018 2 0.0013 0.000 0.0010
42 Vanderbilt 0 0.0000 4 0.0027 0.000 0.0009
43 Houston 0 0.0000 4 0.0027 0.000 0.0009
44 Colorado 2 0.0007 2 0.0013 0.000 0.0007
45 Troy 5 0.0018 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0006
46 Arkansas 4 0.0014 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0005
47 Air Force 4 0.0014 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0005
48 Texas A&M 2 0.0007 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0002
49 Ga Tech 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0000
50 Miss State 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.000 0.0000

Thank god computers are not as bias as humans. SEC teams are not ranked like they are in human polls.

BE can't complain about that.

How does 13 sound for a little respect UConn?

LaRue777 Wrote:BE can't complain about that.

How does 13 sound for a little respect UConn?

Human polls give us no respect. Computer polls love UCONN. Computers don't care about what's in front of the jerseys much other than actual results.

We still got quite a few weeks so we will see how it all plays out. Too bad it will be tough for the BE to get 2 BCS bids but anything is possible.

BE got much more respect in the BCS poll (thanks computers) than the human polls.

In the human polls, if Kansas wins again, the Mountaineers will lose another place in the polls. However, with Arizona State and Oregon facing each other, we should gain a spot. This will leave us in the same place by not playing. This year, win or lose WVU lost ground in the polls.

Yea right. They really respect The BEast.

In answer to LaRue's question, the BCS rankings are 50% computer and 50% human, so, in terms of COMPLETE satisfaction, I'd say no.

Things could always be better but 3 places out of 18 with only a 8 team conference is not too shabby.

Late comer Connecticut going from unranked to 13 in 2 weeks is pretty impressive.

USF still being 18 after two straight losses shows some respect.

I'm sure the BE's small size hurts with the human polls. You are going to have more of your conferences coach's voting in the poll from the larger conferences. I sure the media is also weighted towards the bigger conferences. What ends up happening is that we get 7 teams from the SEC. There probably is no solution.

BJUnklFkr Wrote:In answer to LaRue's question, the BCS rankings are 50% computer and 50% human, so, in terms of COMPLETE satisfaction, I'd say no.

It's 2/3 humans and 1/3 computers.

Coaches poll, Harris poll are 1/3 each and the computers combined count for 1/3.

zibby Wrote:

BJUnklFkr Wrote:In answer to LaRue's question, the BCS rankings are 50% computer and 50% human, so, in terms of COMPLETE satisfaction, I'd say no.

It's 2/3 humans and 1/3 computers.

Coaches poll, Harris poll are 1/3 each and the computers combined count for 1/3.

Thanks Zibby... I actually think that further proves my point.