Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

      
Post Reply 
OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Socko Wiethe Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,209
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 21
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #41
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
OneUChoopsfan Wrote:Back when Union Terminal was being converted to museum, a west side real estate person (Wilson?) wanted to build a monorail to connect it to downtown and the river front. If we had listend to him, we would be there by now and @1980's dollars.

I believe I read the estimate is only 9,500 riders a day which we all know is jacked up considerably for effect. The grafitti removal bills alone will be huge, not to mention broken window replacements and hazard duty for the operators.

It is a wonderful dream but not a viable reality. The people who want to live in an urban setting will move to Newport which already has the urban living plan in place & where it is way much safer and the view is terrific.

Without a Benevolent Dictator form of governmen, it'll never happen anyway. So fogettaboutit.
05-mafia

Go back 20 years and think about the statement you just made about Newport. It would have been laughable.

Things do change over time, and those who have vision will be the ones to take advantage of it. At one point, Mount Adams was a beaten down, blue-collar type neighborhood. Then somebody saw its potential and acted on it and it took off.

Could the same thing happen with OTR and downtown via a streetcar line? The newspaper stories keep citing Portland putting in such a system and generating $2 billion in new economic development all along those routes. You can either go forward saying OTR is a failed neighborhood where change is impossible, or you can try to improve things. And there is evidence out there that streetcars can be a catalyst for change and improvement in urban environments.
 
10-18-2007 03:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
righthook Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 646
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #42
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
Wasnt one of the reasons the suburbs were against the light rail was because of the limited travel to N Ky, the westside and the north? I remember the proposal as pretty much just going through the east side of town up to Mason.

As far as the subway, one of the reasons it didnt work was the engineering - there were right angles. Typical Cincinnati planning.
 
10-18-2007 03:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Shenandoah Cat Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 387
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 7
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #43
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
Agree with Socko on this one. Richmond, VA took an area east of downtown populated by old tobacco warehouses and where no one would venture after dark and turned the warehouses into trendy lofts now inhabited by yuppies. There was also talk of relocating the Richmond Braves (AAA) to a new ball park in the same area (bad idea). Economic development should include everyone. If it can happen in Newport, it can happen in OTR. Incremental steps are the way to go - you have to try or you condemn the area to blight.
 
10-18-2007 03:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
righthook Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 646
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #44
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
Shenandoah Cat Wrote:Incremental steps are the way to go - you have to try or you condemn the area to blight.

But is a $102 mil trolley really the best first increment? It seems there would be better ways to spend the money even if you're still putting it to revitalizing OTR.

I think another issue is the city council. Their track record (or in some cases lack thereof) doesn't inspire a whole lot of confidence.
 
10-18-2007 03:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,380
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2172
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #45
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
This plan is a waste of money on a scale we have not seen since the Freedom Center got crammed down our collective throats. As a result, I bet it gets full approval.
 
10-18-2007 03:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
righthook Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 646
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #46
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
rath v2.0 Wrote:This plan is a waste of money on a scale we have not seen since the Freedom Center got crammed down our collective throats. As a result, I bet it gets full approval.

I thought the Freedom Center in its original plan wasn't a bad idea. It was mismanagement, poor marketing, and incredible over-estimations of projected revenue that destoyed it.
 
10-18-2007 03:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oleskl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,565
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 54
I Root For: UC Bearcats
Location: ATL

Donators
Post: #47
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
righthook Wrote:I thought the Freedom Center in its original plan wasn't a bad idea. It was mismanagement, poor marketing, and incredible over-estimations of projected revenue that destoyed it.

The Freedom Center would have been a good idea if it was built after The Banks was done. That would have given a great amount of people a reason to come down to the area with their whole family to spend the day having fun and visiting the Center. Unfortunately, as City Council has found out, the Freedom Center alone isn't a big enough draw on its own.
 
10-18-2007 03:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oleskl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,565
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 54
I Root For: UC Bearcats
Location: ATL

Donators
Post: #48
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
Looks like the streetcar plan has hit a snag:

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...310180049/
 
10-18-2007 08:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcats23 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,260
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 112
I Root For: bearcats23
Location:
Post: #49
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
Duke was the most likely to put up big money due to the obvious rewards that an electric run street car would provide. I want this to work, but I don't see private sources ponying up 31 mil without Duke.

Edit: After re-reading the article, it sounds like Duke isn't against putting up some dollars, just not 20 million of them.
 
(This post was last modified: 10-18-2007 08:57 PM by bearcats23.)
10-18-2007 08:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,380
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2172
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #50
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
oleskl Wrote:Looks like the streetcar plan has hit a snag:

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...310180049/

What...did common sense break out?
 
10-18-2007 09:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tymanh99 Offline
.
*

Posts: 4,376
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 115
I Root For: .
Location:

Donators
Post: #51
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
rath v2.0 Wrote:
oleskl Wrote:Looks like the streetcar plan has hit a snag:

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...310180049/

What...did common sense break out?

looks to be the case.

[Image: commonsense1nf5.jpg]
 
10-18-2007 09:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,380
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2172
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #52
RE: OT: not that city council ever misses the mark...
That is damn funny Ty. :)
 
10-18-2007 09:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.