OUGwave Wrote:This was a lawful arrest.
It depends on where you say the 'arrest started'.
You see it, when he fights being escorted out.
Others, when he starts to get forcefully 'escorted'.
IMO, they should of cut the mic, had a staff member (not cop) ask him to leave (after mic gets cut, he seems to turn, as if he is heading to sit or leave). He could of then started yelling, "blah blah censor". Then the staff member say, Sir please calm down, you had your chance to ask a question, either listen up or leave, or you will be escorted out for causing a disturbance. Then proceed with force of getting him out.
From his pov, he was trying to ask his stupid question to put kerry in a bind. And the cop kept trying to interupt him. Then he was grabbed by 2 officers, w/o explenation, and dragged out.
You can say "you dont know if he was armed". But I'm sure any event that has a person of kerry's stature present, there will be either, metal detectors and/or a pre-event search. And even if he had a knife strapped to his leg, it would be a little hard to grab it with his arms in the air. But he was probably in there, with his soft-cover book, wallet, and keys.
regardless, the situation was handled poorly.
OUGwave Wrote:And if the court finds the arrest was lawful, your ass is going to jail for a LONNGGG time. Or getting executed.
Yes, the trouble with defending yourself against an unlawful arrest in which you have to use deadly force. You will be labled a cop killer by the media, even if you are innocent and the use was justified. Anytime you interact with cops of that, they will not treat you fairly.
Even though we have "innocent before proven guilty". It is hardly the case. Especialy in touchy crimes. Killing, rape, ect. and even after proven innocent, you cannot go back to your life so easily.
edit:
The charge he recieved:
Quote: Under federal law, a riot is a public disturbance involving an act of violence by one or more persons who are assembled in a group of at least three people. The act of violence must be one that presents a clear and present danger of injury to another person or damage to another person\\\'s property. Threatening to commit a violent act in such a group situation that could injure another person or damage property is also considered a riot if one of the persons in the group has the ability at the time to carry out the threatened violence.
Inciting a riot applies to a person who organizes, encourages, or participates in a riot. It can apply to one who urges or instigates others to riot. It does not apply to someone who merely advocates ideas or expresses beliefs, if those ideas and beliefs do not involve advocating violence.
The federal crime of inciting a riot carries a possible penalty of up to five years in prison a fine.
State and local governments also have laws that make it a crime to incite a riot. The penalties range from fines only to jail time. It is important that the law, even if only a municipal ordinance, specify the conduct that that is prohibited with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited.